% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Ecotality, AŞ Message Board

cpatrader2001 711 posts  |  Last Activity: 1 hour 42 minutes ago Member since: Oct 10, 2006
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Feb 11, 2016 7:44 PM Flag

    Out of nowhere after hrs 5pm yesterday.
    And continued from dawn to dusk today.
    Carry on

  • Reply to

    Dr Kim

    by irishmick8299 Mar 25, 2016 6:22 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 25, 2016 11:39 PM Flag

    Mick.when he did it before thats what got me in.That did not work out too well.I will say his rs followed up with a 8 buck megaraise has shown to be not good for shareholders

  • Reply to

    Isn;'t it time for Slmjm

    by cnoinvester Feb 24, 2016 10:32 AM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 24, 2016 11:16 AM Flag

    Jimimina is still looking for site updates from stash

  • Reply to

    yadot18 or cpa or Whatever He is Going By Now...

    by a1stocker Feb 14, 2016 8:26 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 14, 2016 8:56 PM Flag

    Sauce any luck in finding elsie?

  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Feb 24, 2016 7:19 AM Flag

    August 1, 2013, new Section 251(h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL) becomes effective, which will allow consummation of second-step mergers without stockholder approval following a tender or exchange offer in many circumstances.1
    Issue Addressed by the Proposed Statute and Existing Solutions
    Acquisitions often employ a two-step structure in which the acquiror first launches a tender or exchange offer for any and all outstanding shares. Upon the close of the tender or exchange offer, the acquiror then acquires any shares not tendered in the offer by way of a second-step merger to complete the acquisition.
    Under Delaware law, a “short-form” merger pursuant to DGCL Section 253 does not require stockholder approval of the second-step merger, but can be used only if the acquiror owns at least 90 percent of the target’s outstanding voting stock after the first-step tender or exchange offer. If the tender or exchange offer results in the acquiror owning less than 90 percent of the outstanding voting stock of the target, a “long-form” merger must be utilized, requiring the mailing of a proxy statement to target stockholders and holding a stockholder meeting to approve the merger.
    However, whether a short-form or long-form merger is utilized, the second-step merger is a fait accompli if the acquiror owns enough shares after the tender or exchange offer to approve the merger as a long-form merger, which typically is a precondition to the closing of the first-step tender or exchange offer. Due to the expense and delay associated with preparing, filing and mailing a proxy statement and holding a stockholders meeting, a second-step, long-form merger often is an expensive formality for a corporation that is, after a successful first-step tender or exchange offer, controlled by a stockholder holding sufficient shares to approve a long-form merger.
    Although regulatory and market-based remedies to this situation, such as subsequent offering periods, top-up options and dual-track structures, have been developed over time, the existing solutions have not proven to be effective to eliminate uncertainty as to whether a short-form merger may be utilized. Subsequent offering periods do not guarantee that the acquiror will reach the required 90 percent threshold. Top-up options are dependent on the target’s authorized capitalization and cannot be utilized in all transactions. Dual-track processes may save time2 compared to running consecutive processes for the first-step offer and second-step merger, but they avoid little, if any, of the expense of the long-form merger process and do not eliminate the uncertainty as to whether the stockholder meeting to approve the merger will be held contemporaneously with the closing of the tender or exchange offer.
    Section 251(h): The New Solution
    Section 251(h) remedies this situation by permitting merger agreements entered into after August 1, 2013, to contain a provision eliminating the need for a stockholder vote for a second-step merger following consummation of a tender or exchange offer if certain conditions are met.3 Section 251(h) thus eliminates the need for subsequent offering periods, top-up options and dual-track structures. Section 251(h) is an “opt-in” statute; it is applicable only if the merger agreement includes a provision electing Section 251(h) to apply. Further, Section 251(h) may not be used if the target’s certificate of incorporation expressly requires a stockholder vote to approve a merger, nor may it be used to circumvent a supermajority vote or separate class vote required by the target’s certificate of incorporation.

  • cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 24, 2016 6:17 PM Flag

    One of the worst calls in

    n history.100percent convinced one of the wrongest posts in yahoos mb history

  • Reply to

    Buyers in the house

    by mortman3297 Feb 17, 2016 2:27 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 17, 2016 4:15 PM Flag

    Morts in his poster form today

  • Reply to


    by cpatrader2001 Mar 7, 2016 11:59 AM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 7, 2016 3:27 PM Flag

    Thou shalt not steal
    And if u have a shot on goal let us know and take it

  • Reply to

    My average PPS

    by marketinvestorextraordinaire Feb 10, 2016 10:57 AM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 10, 2016 12:15 PM Flag

    Andy.welcome to the stock mkt.
    Go to sept 30.The old shift
    Go to no cc
    Go to inst investors hfs buying a year ago at 1.71 now 52c

    Go to the slides release update a few weeks ago
    Last but not least.
    Go to bills presentation this week in nyc
    It should not b puzzling to u anymore
    go to oxgns history over the last 2 decades

  • Reply to

    I hate to say

    by jmmjm Feb 29, 2016 4:43 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 29, 2016 4:57 PM Flag

    Jimimina.i was waiting for stash to give us s boots on the ground update

  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Feb 29, 2016 5:00 PM Flag

    I questioned kh taking it my mind it was always on the table but not at 2fitty

  • Reply to

    OXGN Holding Up Well

    by rootbound43 Mar 11, 2016 7:58 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 11, 2016 9:16 PM Flag

    They will do an rs long before a delisting.

  • Reply to

    CC here it is

    by mortman3297 Mar 28, 2016 9:03 AM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 28, 2016 9:30 AM Flag

    Thanx mort
    Did they ask any questions

  • Reply to

    "Mr. Loarbachov - Tear Down That Wall"

    by rootbound43 Apr 6, 2016 11:28 AM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Apr 6, 2016 11:00 PM Flag

    They dont have to buy, they awarded themselves the options a week or two ago

  • Reply to

    sold more nyny to short tesla

    by ibewarcrated Feb 4, 2016 2:48 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Feb 4, 2016 8:35 PM Flag

    Hey nutty does one get 6 red thumbs.Did not know 6 people read this mb

  • Reply to

    All Day Long...

    by a1stocker Mar 9, 2016 3:34 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 9, 2016 6:49 PM Flag

    Sauce what u talking bout.shorts looking to find some cover
    Sauceboy short interest decreased 150k in jan and 200k in feb.lowest its been in months.
    Please use facts to back up your pumping bs.u sold more and more like the old root

  • Reply to


    by cpatrader2001 Mar 11, 2016 10:23 PM
    cpatrader2001 cpatrader2001 Mar 12, 2016 5:55 AM Flag

    Your posts are like fine wine.

  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Mar 15, 2016 9:49 AM Flag

    Cant make that stuff up.
    Memo to ted
    We b at 2.38 now

  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Feb 26, 2016 7:10 AM Flag

    I commend u on your judge of character as trusting henry to post the right thing after the meeting.after all it is a mb.

  • cpatrader2001 by cpatrader2001 Feb 21, 2016 3:52 AM Flag

    Outdid yourself pookie
    Big macs and taidaikais paycheck
    My bud went on a weekend Why rant .
    unprevoked and out of nowhere.
    even brought in scientist cliff
    mice, going dark,dragging feet.playing ceo musical chairs
    Bashing, thrashing and crashing