Dino screwed the pooch on this one. Had he kept SD-101 moving forward instead of shelving it, DVAX might be an acknowledged leader.
Jack, as our Supreme Leader advises with his full authority, don't get too much into this lawsuit bs. Anyone with half a brain knows its garbage. Period. But then we have "knowledgeable" people like myself "connecting the dots" for us. Its amazing how much credit you give me; as our Supreme leader states, and he's never been wrong, I am a fool.
I will emphasize my statement "This could be related to the recent drop back to $22". What a dumb statement! I admit, I am an "armature" clown with no position in DVAX. After a run of about 35%, this stock pulled back on profit taking 15% and I think this is what this lawsuit is about? If an investor can file a lawsuit on a profit taking like what happened with this stock recently, you would have thousands of lawsuits DAILY on the market. What a fricken genius I am, lol.
Sit back and relax. Trust your investment and enjoy the ride. Ignore fools like me. There is only one true genius on this board, who has pegged me for what I am - a dumb fool "armature" clown with no position in DVAX.
If only answers were always so easy...that was an email away...
I contacted Schuman. Despite the "current" references, this proves to be a legacy suit for the 2012-2013 time period.
This appears to be a lawsuit unrelated to those a couple years back. They are soliciting CURRENT shareholders.
Caps mine. This could be related to the recent drop back to $22.
"The Law suit is old hat from 013". Can you cite public information that verifies that, or is that just opinion?
Shelving N8295 was a positive, shows the company has so many exciting compounds and prospects that the financial payoff for a highly efficacious Universal Flu Vaccine was less than, for example, cancer immunotherapy. When everything you have is a winner, somethings gotta give.
YOU own it too. Therefore it follows that ALL things DVAX are good. BAD is not possible.
" Just Saying Too"
Increasing? GOOD DVAX. Means company filling coffers at the ATM and confident investors exercising warrants.
Static? GOOD DVAX. Means company has sufficient funding and ATM no needed.
Decreasing? Good DVAX. Would mean company so confident it's undervalued that it's buying back shares.
Summary: there is nothing, absolutely nothing, that can happen to #shares outstanding that is not GOOD NEWS DVAX.
short interest up = GOOD DVAX
short interest down = GOOD DVAX
short interest unchanged= GOOD DVAX
Does that summarize your opinion?
Ok, I hear you say rising short interest is a positive. What if the short interest were decreasing, would you view that a positive too?