Mine is to check in every now and then, every day if you care to take that multiple alias type of thinking, in other words quasi-bs. Not much to talk about RE: QTWW. They either turn this around over the long haul or go under. High risk and more than 90% of the people will avoid owning this. I own shares. I'm not here to pump. You're here to accuse any author that they use other aliases. You do that #$%$ more than 90% of the time or so it seems. It must be your form of entertainment, as lame as that may be. In your own words, your position and/or sentiment about the stock. Try that for a change.
a shout out thanks for whomever that gave me a thumb's up for a good call. Good call vis-à-vis my Wednesday 02/17 33 minutes before the close.
Honestly if you feel that way, bail. You won't be missed. At the same time QTWW's carbon fiber tech was co-developed with Boeing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The work began in 2008. Goal was mass commercialization. Ready to sell?
I'll get to the above in a minutes because it's not a singular idea. Yesterday, your comments, a cut and paste:
"partnering with xng is great, but are we going back to supplying just the hardware. xng is already in a few years much larger than qtww as a company. it shows be how badly quantum misread the market opportunity."
My reply - Honestly if you feel that way, bail. You won't be missed. At the same time QTWW's carbon fiber tech was co-developed with Boeing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The work began in 2008. Goal was mass commercialization. Ready to sell? //////
Did you forget to answer the question? Are you ready to sell? You do understand the question I presume or do I give you too much credit? What follows is your reply to my remarks.
"you work for quantum i assume and dont like people talking about the company?" Look, netprophecy2, wherever did you get the idea I work for the company? Logically, logic not your strong suit, if I worked for the company wouldn't the tone of my reply be more one of encouraging you to not sell? IMO, I wouldn't be telling you to bail, if I worked for the company that is. The next idea where you go askew, as if I don't like people talking about the company. Truthfully, I dislike liars. I like people that tell the truth. Talk about the company 'til the cows come home or stay silent; after all most shareholders and by a vast majority, they remain silent. BTW, I read a message of yours from mid-Feb, another board. Still a bear at Integral Technologies? But first are you ready to sell QTWW? And no, don't be absurd I do not work for QTWW. And how did you come to assume I did? Be thorough and answer all of my questions. If not, you suck.
My question to you is unanswered. And BTW, your moronic intrusion at the thread directed to netprophecy2 makes you look like you're interfering without valid purpose. Need I reply to you with 1 syllable words? It may facilitate your learning how to discuss intelligently. Surely no one should expect such from you, however.
They need another sale. Almost a 2 decade low in natural gas, that may boost export demand. Quantum's virtual pipeline does allow for transport with a lower shipping weight than other alternatives. Everyone knows the lower the shipping weight the lower the shipping cost. Bottom line, back to the first sentence here.
Quantum has a website. Nasdaq has their SEC filings. Are you lazy or stupid? You are a target for cloudy_day_jane to bash with such a #$%$ message.