None taken. I don't try to create doubt. But if you really look when I write something that could be construed as negative, it is usually in a question. Usually hoping someone more informed on a given subject can help me out.
We want the same thing, we are good in my book :-)
I have no doubt that you are correct. If you throw in the unknown amount of samples out there being used, there could be several thousand on Afrezza for all we know.
Also, if my memory serves me correctly, the only real mention of Afrezza at the CC was about the shortage of samples. Maybe a little clue thrown our way?
First off, great news to hear! And for those that are sweating script counts, this was a sample and it wasn't counted. We may have 1000's on Afrezza that we won't know about until they re-fill.
Just being polite in saying it is untrue. I guess you didn't read my post about the EU label.
I have no idea what your problem is, but I don't care!!!! But I will answer you tit for tat when I see it.
Many longterm longs know my position, so a few like you that don't like me, Oh well!
Great observation. I have not seen one cough. My darn gas heat makes me cough every morning and I have a built in humidifier.
Central & Facts thank you. Honestly I think a blind pumper is worse than a basher in some ways. I believe we will get there (or I would have sold), but straight pumping really isn't positive.
For example, there is a thread stating EU approval coming soon when in fact it hasn't even been applied for.
Now if a Newbie reads that, they are getting false info. There is no help there!
f77, That is not my intention in any way, shape, or form. There is a difference between an attack and a concern. I don't know why we can't openly discuss those. I always thought this was a discussion board, and was hoping someone could put my concern to rest.
I don't claim to know it all, so sometimes I reach out to others on this board. I do it in business, relationships, even my faith.
If I had all the answers to stock investing and life in general, do you think I would be on this board? Warren doesn't come on here. LOL
I think there are some very intelligent people on here (smarter than I am), so from time to time, I will ask questions. If I felt I had to attack MNKD, I wouldn't own any.
Hope that clears up my intent. And BTW, I am very long on mNKD and want it to sicceed as much as any long on here.
I don't know, my portfolio looks like I am probably long. Why you attack a concern or a question, I don't know. You call me a tool, so yeah I get a little defensive. You do have a tendancy to read others as negative if the aren't cheerleading the he$$ out of this. And I don't have you on ignore.
I just am not afraid to ask questions. If it offend you, put me on ignore.
And if my concern is so wrong, how can it be negative or damaging?
If I am reading this thread correctly, are y'all saying that the Type 2 market will be harder to penetrate? Going back to the ADCOM, I thought Type 2 was the "big Fish".
I guess my question is, will "A' be more for Type 1's and has the paradigm switched, or am I just not comprehending this thread?
It seems I have not read a Tweet or blog yet except from Type 1s.
There was a rather lenghtly thread by a Poster named Keplerstars (Or something close) that discusses this. Saw some strong longs that seem to be in agreement. Maybe I am misunderstanding it.
Keep seeing a lot of good feedback, but it seems they are all type 1. Way back at the ADCOM Type 2 approval was the biggest concern due to the bigger market. I am reading quite a few posts that Type 2's may be harder to get on "A' due to other (although lesser) type treatments already out there.
I swear the more I read, the more confused I am getting.
From my experience you are correct. There have been medicines that are new (not diabetic) that my Doctor has given me samples and a script at the same time. Sometimes the Doctor isn't sure about side effects or if the new medicine will be anymore helpful. So to save me the $ of buying the script first, he gives me samples to see if the script makes sense to fill.
That is sort of my point. I would bet there are more people on samples than Scripts. Most (IMO) will stay on it. I was trying to say "Don't worry about the Script #'s". I think we are more on our way than people realize.