Of course ALU still cares about the shift plan and indeed as they are (will be) 55% of NOK they want and need NOK shares to do well. Both ALU and NOK are undervalued, and if NOK can get a good price for Here, good Sammy ruling, etc., and sell certain parts of combined business and find decent synergies, this combined company can go up nicely.
Maybe the poor share performance for so long leads to bashing?
But why is NOK down?
How is it that NOK ranks so low here at only $750 million when I thought they were supposed to have about the best, deepest, patents out there? Less than ERIC?
..this is nothing near a breakout. Needs to get a lot higher ($8.30) to break the rinse and repeat cycle. I wonder what those r&r traders are doing; do they sell now at this level thinking NOK will go back to $7.50?
...serious needs to be done, such as megs idea of a large share buyback or new management.
You think mewag controls what Google lists? I think you give her more credit than she deserves. So what she proved you wrong on pizza, we really should keep this board on NOK.? You do seem to always post at the same time as that frenchie guy and with similar content. Are you, he, and chickenlittle the same poster, or am I as paranoid as you seem?
...very long time. What is wrong with NOK. I agree that there are way too may shares out for a company of NOK's size. Those posting for new management may be right. I don't see how so many (or is it just one or two actual posters) can defend how poorly NOK has done for over a year and still defend Suri and the lack of any positive share action. His time is running out.
But why? There are way too many shares out for a company of Nokia's size.
...proved itself to be a toy rag doll to be shaken at will. With all that cash NOK management should have done much better.