Mon, Dec 22, 2014, 1:50 PM EST - U.S. Markets close in 2 hrs 10 mins


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Ambit Biosciences Corporation Message Board

daweasl652 45 posts  |  Last Activity: Dec 11, 2014 9:49 PM Member since: Apr 21, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    no body said it would be easy

    by oilup12345 Dec 11, 2014 9:30 PM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Dec 11, 2014 9:49 PM Flag

    the p.r. announcing first patient enrolled in the ph IIB combo trial - volume, share price+

  • Reply to

    Questions for Conf. Call !!

    by biowagers Dec 5, 2014 2:11 PM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Dec 5, 2014 11:22 PM Flag

    3 excellent questions .....who's man enough to call in, que up and when connected (remember the whole board will be listening) grill Punit ?

    I listened to some of the Stifel Healthcare conf. earlier - The extension trial, began last March. At the 12:25 mark ..."it's expected to complete enrollment by the end of next year" .. 21 patients ! 1 patient per month? That's not good enough. Do not defend the company. It's bull. 2 patients a month, trial is enrolled this year.

    The design of the PhIIB,- It will have an increased dosing frequency... . (guarantee #6)

    As far as announcing a trial in a new indication , ....At the 6 min mark .. . .

    " ...other indications we're interested in exploring beyond skin cancer and you'll see one or more of these trials come online in the next 12 months"

    imo, question #3 , the answers are a watershed moment for Oncs. Glta

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Dec 2, 2014 2:32 PM Flag

    a section of the Oncs p.r. dated June 10, 2011 ,.they also discuss biomarkers. Hello PerkinElmer.
    In this Phase I trial, the experimental regimen was safe and well tolerated, with minimal systemic toxicity. Local treated lesions were biopsied and showed that 76% of all samples had at least 20% necrosis of the tumor, with 34% of those lesions showing 100% necrosis (clearance of the tumor). Furthermore, patients with additional tumors beyond the treated tumor were followed to determine regression of distant untreated lesions. Results demonstrated that 10 (53%) of 19 patients with distant untreated lesions showed at least stable disease or objective (partial or complete) regression. In addition, 15% of these patients demonstrated 100% clearance of distant, untreated metastatic melanoma tumors; by comparison, only 0.25% of such tumors would normally be expected to clear on their own if left untreated. The observed tumor regression of untreated lesions suggested a systemic immune response to the localized treatment . .. .. . .

    - 15% of these patients demonstrated 100% clearance of distant, untreated .............tumors.
    - observed tumor regression . .. . . . .suggested a systemic response ......

    The abstracts this week; looking for confirmation of data followed by spike in share price.

  • “This collaboration with Dr. Algazi and UCSF with support from Merck marks the first clinical trial to evaluate the combination of an anti-PD-1 antibody with an intratumoral therapy using electroporation. Over the course of the last year, OncoSec has continually stated the need to evaluate intratumoral therapies that have the ability to convert the anti-PD-1 non-responder population to responders. The design of this clinical trial . . ." said PD-1 ......Umm, err....said Punit Dhillon, CEO.

    "The design of this clinical trial" ----- No Guessing Allowed ! Guti, you own the investigative journalism award, I'm counting on you .

    1) the original 30 patient regimen

    2) the 21 patient extension trial. (increased dosing schedule)

  • With today's news , 236 million shares can be put up for sale on the open market. Ouch. Surprisingly, yesterday's volume was less than 3 per cent of the float and we closed up 15%. Nice. Four more milestones, . .. .we close the year___ .75

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 24, 2014 6:29 PM Flag

    - - - - - SYSTEMIC IMMUNE RESPONSE - - - - -

  • Reply to

    I have been here long enough.

    by kar26dav Nov 23, 2014 4:49 PM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 23, 2014 10:22 PM Flag

    There will be a r/s announced at next summer's annual meeting. This spring shareholders will vote on officers and a r/s option, ie: 1 for 4, 1 for 6, etc. --- Ino did this last spring, now it's Oncs turn. The r/s option ALWAYS gets a yes vote. With rare exception. 300 MILLION fully diluted shares ! Punit will go with 1 for 10.

    I'm out Dec./Jan up . . - AERI - ph III trials, float of 12 Million shares.

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 19, 2014 11:26 PM Flag

    Punit's reply set the stage. I knew they couldn't plan partnership announcement and 1st patient enrolled on the same day. No company could time that. He did say 1st enrollment Jan. is possible. That leaves us with a Partnership announcement first and the trial design (protocol, # of patients, etc.) in the same p.r.- . .. ..forget my earlier post, Oncs working on the 'fine print' with PD-1 supplier.

    the (speculative) weasl.

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 19, 2014 10:53 PM Flag

    i just listened to the call - Punit would make a great poker player : ) , the guessing is still front and center.
    ..ever the optimist = currently talking to the 3 PD-1 players, the highest bid wins(?)

  • daweasl652 by daweasl652 Nov 16, 2014 10:16 PM Flag

    Last March Oncs announced the 'expansion trial' , up to 21 patients ......'to evaluate an increased dosing frequency in an expansion of it's ongoing ph II melanoma trial'

    Results from this 21 patient trial have not been released. From a common sense standpoint, Oncs must have the results in hand....otherwise why start the ph IIB ? The increased dosing schedule could show a much higher response (efficacy) than the original 30 patient trial.

    The best case scenario - increased efficiency, the data secures a PD-1 partner, the trial protocol is set .. . and Merck funds the new ph II ........and we get cash up front......and we get large percentage of royalties ....and .... .share price busts through $1 .. . ...

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 16, 2014 7:55 PM Flag

    it's called going out on a limb. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    1) trial begins without partnership
    2) p.r. announcing 1st patient enrolled (start of ph2B) will not name supplier of PD-1.

    the (village idiot?) weasl . . .. .. .answers soon enough.

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 12, 2014 1:20 PM Flag

    - " the benefit was just barely statistically signicant with a P value of 0.049 "

    - " Roche's AURELIA study is much larger and the data more reliable. Oxigene's data are derived from a small subset of 27 platinum-resistant patients. Given the small size of the phase II, I suspect the fosbretabulin results will regress further when phase III results are eventually reported."
    "results will regress further when phase III results are ....reported."

    A ph III using all OC patients is a fail - This is why the stock is selling down. Investors who tell themselves "market manipulation', "shorts are holding this down".....Good luck.

    Approval is at least 3 yrs away, if at all. Looking closely at the ph II results, this is not a good investment. Not anymore......anything over $2 I sell......took a chance on readout .. . ..glta.

  • daweasl652 by daweasl652 Nov 10, 2014 3:34 PM Flag

    Seeing you're invested here is a good sign, i hope lol ! I still read the IV board, out of habit (?) .....Cal, Gains, Red, Tasty, Biomachine, etc., ........good people - GLTU.

  • Reply to

    the p.r.

    by daweasl652 Nov 10, 2014 1:50 PM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 10, 2014 2:08 PM Flag

    - post-hoc subgroup analysis- ...can't believe GOG didn't design trial with 'pre-specified subgroup' ....Oxgn should know better. .....They never realized there could be a difference in response ?...geeze

    In the design and analysis of experiments, post-hoc analysis (from Latin post hoc, "after this") consists of looking at the data—after the experiment has concluded—for patterns that were not specified a priori. It is sometimes called by critics data dredging to evoke the sense that the more one looks the more likely something will be found . .....Wiki.

  • daweasl652 by daweasl652 Nov 10, 2014 1:50 PM Flag

    - Subgroup analysis of GOG1862 Study Showed benefit . . . . . .

    Oxgn has a headline at the top of the p.r. that investors run from, big money and retail. The term 'subgroup' is associated with 'data mining'.....used by small bio's looking to bolster the final data readout. The p value .049, for all patients just got under the stat sig requirement of .05 - Increasing the 'N' in a ph III will lower the final 'P' value. Wall street is well aware of that. Espr announced p= 0.001 in their ph II, stock doubled.
    In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, data showed that patients who were platinum-resistant also had a statistically significant improvement in PFS with the combination. Among these 27 patients, median PFS was 6.7 months for those on bevacizumab and fosbretabulin compared to 3.4 months for those receiving bevacizumab alone (p=0.01

    Oxgn must design a ph III using this subgroup in their primary endpoint. P=0.01 will not fail in the larger trial. Will they ? They better. Large pharma won't like the idea. They are greedy for $$$. Getting Z approved for 25% of the OC patient population .....BP won't like it , I don't care, too bad. Enrolling all ovarian patients is fine, the benefit of Z should not be withheld based on platinum status.

    ps- the potential revenue and current market cap [45M] .., I have never seen such a discrepancy in bio.

  • Reply to

    my guess

    by cpatrader2001 Nov 9, 2014 2:14 PM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 9, 2014 2:53 PM Flag

    for the first time could kei. be right ? "imo, this sunday's presentation is not a major catalyst"

    that in itself is worthy of a pr ... .. . . [hey kei. , just kiddin]

  • Reply to

    Any news?

    by camerowade Nov 9, 2014 1:25 AM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 9, 2014 2:25 AM Flag

    i had fallen asleep,,,awake5 mins ago --- can we get a final P-value posted .. .

    pratikshah915 .. . . .? TIA

  • daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 8, 2014 1:53 PM Flag

    if you guys don't mind.....a third possibility - (the ceo at the time of pr..... now gone)

    Maybe,,,,Oxgn was told of the stat sig 2 sided .10 , and in there infinitesimal wisdom, got real stupid. The whole bio investing world looks for the 1 sided .05 as the stat sig standard.

    Did Oxgn decide to 'dumb down' the .10 result, putting .05 in their p.r ...... ? The company should responded to the SA article.

  • Reply to

    Presentation on Sunday

    by geoffb101 Nov 8, 2014 9:09 AM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 8, 2014 9:55 AM Flag

    kei. final Ph II results, stat sig on PFS or OS , 100+% upside - miss, 50-60% downside.

  • Reply to

    ot: oxgn

    by daweasl652 Nov 6, 2014 12:29 AM
    daweasl652 daweasl652 Nov 6, 2014 11:59 AM Flag

    I hate bios . . . . and the internet - 110 patient Ph II Abstract this weekend. I hope the fat lady doesn't start singing.

15.60+0.26(+1.69%)Nov 10 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.