that's the story I'm going with
even other nerds were not impressed. They put out two PR's to say they were giving a presentation and the stock is down hard on large volume.
Is this really all they have? Preliminary lab results and techno mumbo jumbo?
why are they still holding back on news? Q1 was the lowest amount of announced new sales in the history of the company. Less than $1M.
Why go to two investor presentations in May? Why bother?
Why have a quarterly conference call? Why bother?
Why pay Liolios to answer investor questions?
Why be a public company?
over 20% requires a shareholder vote. So I think they will just go for 20% or about $6M which would seem to get them through another year
he lies, deletes posts, and berates other posters who disagree. He has lost his life savings during some horrible calls he has made.
bunch of techno mumbo jumbo that only a nerd would know.
How does this differ from what's already out there? How much does it reduce costs or pollution?
A nerd put this together. company is a bunch of nerds with no common sense. A bunch of Sheldons
This should not be a public company
I doubt anyone will cough up the $25 and will spew what's in the presentation instead. Bunch of lightweights and liars
Are they wasting their money on these patents. what's the point if they aren't licensing?
make that 2 patents granted today
United States Patent 9,011,784
Golden , et al. April 21, 2015
Catalyst with lanthanide-doped zirconia and methods of making
The invention generally relates to three-way catalysts and catalyst formulations capable of simultaneously converting nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons into less toxic compounds. Such three-way catalyst formulations contain ZrO.sub.2-based mixed-metal oxide support oxides doped with an amount of lanthanide. Three-way catalyst formulations with the support oxides of the present invention demonstrate higher catalytic activity, efficiency and longevity than comparable catalysts formulated with traditional support oxides.
Inventors: Golden; Stephen J. (Santa Barbara, CA), Hatfield; Randal (Oxnard, CA), Pless; Jason D. (Pottstown, PA)
United States Patent 9,012,353
Golden , et al. April 21, 2015
Palladium solid solution catayst and methods of making
Disclosed are three-way catalysts that are able to simultaneously convert nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons in exhaust gas emissions into less toxic compounds. Also disclosed are three-way catalyst formulations comprising palladium (Pd)-containing oxygen storage materials. In some embodiments, the three-way catalyst formulations of the invention do not contain rhodium. Further disclosed are improved methods for making Pd-containing oxygen storage materials. The relates to methods of making and using three-way catalyst formulations of the invention.
Inventors: Golden; Stephen J. (Santa Barbara, CA), Hatfield; Randal (Oxnard, CA), Pless; Jason D. (Pottstown, PA), Ngo; Johnny T. (Oxnard, CA)
Name City State Country Type
Golden; Stephen J.
Pless; Jason D.
Ngo; Johnny T.
Assignee: Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Oxnard, CA)
United States Patent 9,007,209
Ehrman , et al. April 14, 2015
Cargo and door sensor
Implementations for a system to receive a message indicating that an ambient light level measured by an ambient light sensor within a container exceeds a first threshold value or falls below a second threshold value; in response to the message indicating that the ambient light level exceeds the first threshold value, activate a cargo sensor; and in response to the message indicating that the ambient light level falls below the second threshold value, de-activate the cargo sensor.
1 20150105247 Methods and Processes of Coating Zero-PGM Catalysts including with Cu, Mn, Fe for TWC Applications
2 20150105243 Systems and Methods for Zero-PGM Binary Catalyst Having Cu, Mn, and Fe for TWC Applications
3 20150105242 Influence of Base Metal Loadings on TWC Performance of ZPGM Catalysts
On February 4, 2015, representatives of the second exploration and mining company that had expressed interest in Revett met with representatives of Revett at Troy. On February 6, 2015, this company submitted a non-binding indicative proposal to Revett wherein it would purchase $15 million of Revett units, each comprising one share of Revett common stock and one full warrant to purchase Revett common stock. The Revett common stock was to be priced at 10% below the then current market price (38c) and the exercise price of the warrant was to be priced at 30% above the then current market price of Revett common stock. In addition, the company was to obtain contractual rights to control the Revett board of directors and a royalty stream from future production. The proposal also entailed a transfer of one of the company’s early stage mining projects into Revett, which would have required Revett to obtain substantial capital in addition to what was required to develop Revett’s Rock Creek project, and would entail a longer development timeframe than Rock Creek. The Revett board of directors considered this proposal but rejected it, in part because the board of directors believed the price being offered for the units would be harmful to stockholder value, in part because the amount of money to be invested was not sufficient to meet Revett’s cash needs and advance the proposing company’s other mining projects, and in part because the Revett board of directors did not view the proposing company as having the knowledge, deep underground mining experience or financial resources to prosecute the permitting and development of Rock Creek.
I wonder if this was MGN?