think it's a bit of both shorts covering and possible buyout, but don't bet on rumors as fact, shorts made their money, and moving on to another victim.
on these positions, Of course they will allow there analyst's release the dogs and attempt to push lower, all corrupt no wonder people hate the manipulation
Nice comments thoughtful and well written, my only comment is the FDA needs to change the process by which to evaluate new drugs. I believe that the FDA's policies are arcane and outdated. Change is needed. Takes way too long and way too much money to develop, submit, process, evaluate. In the end costing taxpayers billions for these drugs
we need to clear all the bureaucracy and red tape, especially with drugs that provide critical life savers and have been proven safe. The system needs to be fixed. IMHO
I agree, just want odds more concrete. Human factor has many faces
and get to know what she is thinking????? Wash DC I guess,
very concerned, that management cannot deliver or even execute. Just concerned, not slamming. Thoughts??
any news I'm missing, help out here boys?
breaks rank??? it was 6 yes 7 no could have went either way.
remember vote was 6 yes 7 no, Woodcock is the deciding vote, white house has been pushing dire drugs that are needed to save these kids. Jerry Lewis what say you?
we could see 55 to 65 by end of year. GL
Just pathetic on this panel of (so called experts) and none of them was an expert in DMD. The plea was for these boys to continue to receive treatments, FDA be damned.
No reason to not use, if it helps just one child, that makes it all worth while.
will SRPT staff be able to speak on these long term trials or is it not allowed?