well hear_meroar I would correct one thing, CNN has released exactly what poll will be used and what date, FAUX news has just said it would use polls (not what polls, not when they were taken, not how many) so there is a chance they won't even let the donald in, LOL
course in the real world
Conservatives exhibit less cognitive ability than liberals do. Or that's what it says in the social science literature, anyway. A 2010 study using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, for example, found that the IQs of young adults who described themselves as "very liberal" averaged 106.42, whereas the mean of those who identified as "very conservative" was 94.82. Similarly, when a 2009 study correlated cognitive capacity with political beliefs among 1,254 community college students and 1,600 foreign students seeking entry to U.S. universities, it found that conservatism is "related to low performance on cognitive ability tests." In 2012, a paper reported that people endorse more conservative views when drunk or under cognitive pressure; it concluded that "political conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought."
considering you are a self admitted old coot who was around during the Cuban missile crisis your dementia means you can't remember long now can you. LOL
tell us about the good old days great grandpa when blacks couldn't use the drinking fountains
well not really, a lot of the dimwitted have been lead to believe that false narrative by FAUX news. Nobody voted for the war, but there was a vote that said if Bush failed diplomatically he was authorized to decide to go to war.
The resolution "supported" and "encouraged" diplomatic efforts by President George W. Bush to "strictly enforce through the U.N. Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq" and "obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion, and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq."
The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
In Time’s account of the speech, reporter Maya Rhodan writes:
In a 45-minute speech, Obama called for reducing or eliminating mandatory minimum sentences, reviewing the use of the solitary confinement and barring employers from asking job applicants about their criminal history, among other things.
While the clowns at WWN changed it to this:
In a 45-minute speech, Obama called for reducing or eliminating mandatory minimum sentences, reviewing the use of the solitary confinement and banning of Confederate and Tea Party Flags on public property, among other things.
and we know how great that worked out
I think it's good that the RNC has finally admitted that FAUX news is in charge of their party. Yup fair and balanced, LOL
I don't know about you but I like the veterans that were smart enough not to get maimed and paralyzed. The injured ones are looooooosers. Hell they're worse then the ones that get captured. They end up just being welfare rats.
can't we just give it to Mexico, it was theirs before the Texans stole it so they could keep slaves.
no one said we should give nukes to Iran grandpa, that's just your dementia calling out
well in the real world JFK (our Democrat President at the time) prevented the USSR from installing missiles in Cuba gramps.
The reason for the embargo was because the people overthrew a dictator who stealing from his people but allowing the U.S. to open up casinos and run drugs.
yeah cause in teabillistan naming a street after someone who preached peace, nonviolence and equality is the same as naming a street after someone who preached that slavery was their right, murdered hundreds of thousands of people and committed treason.
it is simply impossible to underestimate the stupidity of you people
LOL GOP figures it is good politics to shut down the gubernment again if they can't deny cancer screenings to poor women,
how #$%$ are these people really?
wait didn't Ronald Raygun fix Social Security, you mean he was a failure?
Remarks on Signing the Social Security Amendments of 1983 --April 20, 1983
The President. Well, I want to extend to all of you a very warm welcome. Something ought to be warm. [Laughter] But it's especially fitting that so many of us from so many different backgrounds--young and old, the working and the retired, Democrat and Republican--should come together for the signing of this landmark legislation.
This bill demonstrates for all time our nation's ironclad commitment to social security. It assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half a century ago. It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire.
Yes in GOP pretend land all those 16-19 year old kids in high school should have a full time job, and nobody should ever retire before 68. LOL Oh let's not forget the people in prison, the mentally ill, the severely handicapped and the mentally handicapped all of those lazy slackers should be working full time.