Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

iBio, Inc. Message Board

delweine 37 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 20, 2015 2:24 AM Member since: Dec 2, 2003
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Sirgo purchases $60k worth of stock

    by investguy571 Aug 19, 2015 10:58 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 20, 2015 2:24 AM Flag

    3 years ago, the stock was in the 2's as I know since I wrote my first article on it then. U are so wrong it's actually kind of sad. This is developmental biotech and these stocks have huge price swings. Almost always, barring terrible failures, these stocks return to their former highs in time. Did you buy it too high? The fact that next to no shares were dumped after being received is very bullish. Stock is grossly over shorted and over sold from the high tute ownership. They will cover when ready and stock will run way back up barring a total IBB meltdown, so relax, play some golf or something!

  • Reply to

    Delweine,

    by chasrx Aug 9, 2015 8:49 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 20, 2015 2:20 AM Flag

    u forgetting about stock option grants totalling a certain price yearly. I have no doubt these guy have been running a derivative scam as it's common. Yes, u are correct, in regards to this particular earn out and I was wrong. I would think since they have been caught, stuff will stop. I have a lot of stuff I'm working on, but it's not about sueing the company, that would hurt shareholders and lawyers just get money while bagholders get a reach around. Either Hart and his equity buddies cover their shorts, or they can gamble and think they are insulated.

  • delweine delweine Aug 20, 2015 2:16 AM Flag

    And what good would it do now to sue the company? All you will do is hurt shareholders further. Obviously Jason and BOD are #$%$, we know this. We also know they have very good deals lined up and a lot ot deferred revenue. Milberg, u should be the last guy talking stuff here with your record. Isn't the kettle black enough already without calling the pot black?

  • Reply to

    Disney D23 Expo Stock Up

    by inveforsale Aug 14, 2015 3:20 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 14, 2015 5:04 PM Flag

    First u need to get the repair damaged before a buy out is even possible here. To get the real worth here, one would have to pay 400% or higher premium - NOT HAPPENING. I honestly do think it will work out here, just be patient

  • Reply to

    Jason Hart and His BS Confrence Call

    by milberg_weiss_esq Aug 14, 2015 4:29 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 14, 2015 5:02 PM Flag

    Maybe, but you will forgive him when stock goes back to former levels and higher :)

  • Reply to

    My analysis of the CC

    by digitalttrader Aug 14, 2015 11:51 AM
    delweine delweine Aug 14, 2015 5:01 PM Flag

    That's the real reason for non compliance btw :) U know my views on that Digi!

  • Reply to

    Decent CC

    by this_is_your_end Aug 13, 2015 5:53 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 13, 2015 7:07 PM Flag

    They filter out tough questions. Have to sandbag them to get on. I can't speak for compliance other than to say lawsuit should be settled this week based on arbitration clause kick in. Whether or not that brings these guys into compliance will be based on just how crooked they are. I suspect there has been derivative nonsense going on here. I tried to warn people ages ago that this company was ignoring SEC regulations.

  • Reply to

    Delweine,

    by chasrx Aug 9, 2015 8:49 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 13, 2015 4:30 PM Flag

    Simple - who u think controls most of the shorts? When shorts cover, what happens? Why u think he pre announced terrible earnings? to get a lower price so shorts could cover lower.

  • Reply to

    Delweine,

    by chasrx Aug 9, 2015 8:49 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 13, 2015 4:29 PM Flag

    He still has more shares to be awared

  • Reply to

    Delweine,

    by chasrx Aug 9, 2015 8:49 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 12, 2015 4:19 PM Flag

    catalysts - settlement of lawsuit + compliance. Consider this -- Jason is owed a certain amount of money, something like 3m dollars. He is paid via stock. The lower the stock price, the more shares he gets. What does that tell you? How much does he really profit once his shares are allotted? It's stock and derivative fraud going on here. Who u think controls most of the short interest?

  • delweine delweine Aug 12, 2015 4:13 PM Flag

    Lawsuit settle and compliance are catalysts. After that, I can't say. If u do the DD u will know exactly when lawsuit will be settled. all I will say.

  • Reply to

    digitaltrader v tonyvelleca

    by g_younit Aug 8, 2015 1:14 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 8, 2015 5:45 PM Flag

    INVE was over priced where it was before, now its under priced considering future prospects. Investors look at the long term 5+ years. Tony just looks at the past and now and demonstrates his lack of knowledge INVE deals that pertain to the future. in other words, Tony is the old guard and under the old guard, he would be correct and has been correct. But he is dead wrong about the future because he doesnt understand IOT, cisco, ACRX or anything IOT. I ignore him now that INVE weaknesses have been exposed and fleshed out with the damage done, his views are moot

  • Reply to

    digitaltrader v tonyvelleca

    by g_younit Aug 8, 2015 1:14 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 8, 2015 5:42 PM Flag

    No he hasnt. Tony did not know what Zalviso was, flat out says cisco deal is nothing when I know for a fact it's very big for the future. When someone gives a point of view on a company, then demonstrates they don't know the fundamental DD, they are to be ignored.

  • Reply to

    Digitaltrader

    by inveforsale Aug 6, 2015 10:41 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 8:22 PM Flag

    See? U are an absolute moron. Zalviso is a product being developed by $ACRX in which INVE is providing the security the FDA has requested because the product dispenses schedule II narcotics (pain meds) This demonstrates you have not done DD and why I stay off yahoo boards for the most part -- Morons like yourself who focus on one thing .. If INVE was a premise company, there would be no Cisco deal. What part of your brain is dense about this? U prob dont even know what CISCO smart city is. Back on ignore until you demonstrate a working knowledge of what the heck you are talking about

  • Reply to

    Digitaltrader

    by inveforsale Aug 6, 2015 10:41 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 5:02 PM Flag

    And of course, the 1B cisco is spending on its smart city which my sources say INVE is the primary creator of means nothing, right? or Zalviso (u prob dont have a clue what im referring to) the analyst reports say that basically about a transition. the new channels are to get away from the old tech that INVE cant compete in, which u have said before. Go ahead. short away

  • Reply to

    Digitaltrader

    by inveforsale Aug 6, 2015 10:41 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 4:35 PM Flag

    Exactly what I said. U are right, they dont care about that stuff. Did you read analyst reports? each one says exactly that. Those channels you mention are the past. new channels are the future. The past gets INVE no where. At these stock levels, its a buy, before, it was a sell. U can do math, right?

  • Reply to

    Throwing the baby out with the bath water

    by digitalttrader Aug 6, 2015 1:31 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 4:32 PM Flag

    breadcrumb -- find the case, track the progress.

  • Reply to

    Throwing the baby out with the bath water

    by digitalttrader Aug 6, 2015 1:31 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 4:31 PM Flag

    the odds of Jason sandbagging to sell to prb equity on cheap is very low. if he did that, I would sue each and every board member, their careers would be ruined, they would lose personal wealth. It's not likely that will occur, but Jason is very diabolical, so it's always a possibility.

  • Reply to

    Throwing the baby out with the bath water

    by digitalttrader Aug 6, 2015 1:31 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 4:29 PM Flag

    No Lawyer would touch this now. And by the time they would, the stock would be back to its former levels. Digitial understand the game here. u do not. Who do you think actually took MOST OF the offering at $15? same who has been shorting it. It's all a ruse. If Jason fails. myself and others have the goods on INVE board and the means to sue each BOD member. Doing that now is stupid. Dig is essentially correct in his equation. He just thinks that Jason did it on accident while I know he did it on purpose. That is why I bailed long ago, and have recently bought back in. U can know as well if you do the research.

  • Reply to

    Digitaltrader

    by inveforsale Aug 6, 2015 10:41 PM
    delweine delweine Aug 7, 2015 4:24 PM Flag

    U want to replace Jason, who personally owns the IP to all of the Cisco deal? Congrats, u replace Jason, you assure the stock goes to zero. USE YOUR HEAD u emotionally challenged dummy retail! I despise the man as well, but he's brilliant in terms of being a tech geek. As a human being, he's a turd. So what? Just relax, u arent on margin shares are you? if not, its only a bag that is VERY LIKELY OVER time to be a winner. Have a drink and chill!

IBIO
0.72+0.01(+0.70%)Sep 4 4:01 PMEDT