let me re explain. INVE provides a hardware based contact-less (NFC) secure element OTP/2A. what you showed was a software based system, NON CONTACTLESS, ,Identiv's solutions provided an extra level of encryption and it NFC based - contact-less. They hold that patent and was co created by Jason Hart.. Ok, last post from me unless someone directly asks me a question, GL!
Sentiment: Strong Buy
no, thats old. that is no good for the future of CC transactions. As we can see from the picture, the cc number is displayed. $INVE uses a unique identifier that does not contain credit card number, just a one time identity number which matches digital cert on CC company end. what u seem to be showing is standard payments of today being used on a mobile phone
growth and licensing their tech out to those who compete against each other. $INVE has the only tech of this kind in terms of numberless cc transactions, credentials and authentication. I believe they do about $100M this year, then we see how the traction gains into next year
from first data website: "We have partnered with the top companies within various vertical markets. In some cases, these companies have integrated First Data merchant services into their technology products and offerings, creating an integrated solution. In other cases, partners have chosen to leverage our breadth of products and services, by offering First Data solutions to their business customers through a referral relationship, thereby providing a comprehensive merchant services program to their customer base."
Note above " use our products, leverage our products, offer our products" where do you see any "partner" where first data is using someone's else tech and branding it under their name? Same with Verizon. Show me where INVE is mentioned by Verizon? Same exact deal. INVE does not have the sales force to direct partner -- yet. Jason was very clear how the first part of biz plan will go. In my phone calls with company, they are clear that this will be short and mid term strategy, Long term, if there is solid uptake = enough revenue and cash on hand to go it alone. follow now?
Trimesta was not up for approval Jedi Masta Beta. Bazooka might have been wrong about positive data. in part it was but in general, it failed to meet primary endpoint
Because those partners you see are SERVED by first data, follow? Those partners use first data's products. In this case, First Data uses INVE tech via licensing it.
i also clearly said they are indirectly involved with Apple Iphone 6 payments, they are. What ive been wrong about is how and thru whom. Now, I have found that out n-- First Data.
Only a total idiot would not know that the ipay thing is using tech created by INVE. First data already says they doing it. Ok, find me the patent first data has for the tech. GL, because you wont. INVE has the patent, hence they are licensing it out to first data, and prob get a cut of each payment transaction.
Of course the fact that INVE and first data did a joint panel discussion on this tech is just pure coincidence right?
How would company pr that since first data is pushing it under THEIR BRAND? Same with Verizon. What matters here is growth and topline earnings. profit will take longer. A company just does not restructure under new management and poof, they achieve a massive valuation.
Disney, Csco - yes. Nitendo - yes. Hart very clear that these are basically licensing/partnership deals and that company would grow this way
nope, im not entirely right all the time. ive been close here. go back and see my first posts on this board. I clearly said that INVE would raise to get tutes in.
cease and desist right now from calling me a "paid" pumper. Test me and see if my lawyer does not sue you for the 10 bucks u are worth,. I'm fine with calling me a pumper, thats an opinion. By saying I get paid, that implies im dishonest, and its slander and I will legally go after you, even if I lose money, just to make a point, Think carefully, u arent anonymous as u think
I'm sorry, I was not aware the offering was over $15? Of course it's shorted back down. Not only can't you DD, u are clueless about how offerings in low floaters work. Hart, myself, no one else is responsible for you buying high, getting burned because you buy on hype rather than DD, this is on you and other hot money morons.
I said they are working indirectly with Apple. Call Lennart and ask about Disney. It's not on me to do DD for you. Not my fault you are a lazy idiot. Call and ask about CSCO. Refer to June 4th cc with INVE and first data. Check first data patents. It's really simple. I'll assume you can ad 2+2, right? I mean based on your posts, I somewhat question your ability in the regard.
Again, you are responsible for being an ignorant over emotional moron and responsible to call the company, talk to IR, Check around, research. not me!
Do everyone a favor, just hold a short for about 10 days here. then read Humpty Dumpty and emulate it.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Yoda, this is a good sign, since you are NEVER right. Remember Obagi and Solta? How did your predictions do on those verses mine? U should sell, u clearly have not done the DD on this to make such a comment