Why? Because it and predecessor companies have been pieces of sheeeeeet since at least 2003 -- and contiue to be POS. Is that a good enough reason?
Perhaps you could explain why GILD's done it twice in the last 12 months.
Go back and reread my post. I didn't say they said that over a decade ago. I said "they have been saying that for over a decade."
Let's try some different words so you'll understand: dopey pumpers have been constantly saying what you said for years (since at least 2003) and they have been ALWAYS been wrong.
I suppose you don't know that longs on this board (and prior company boards) have been saying things like that for over a decade, and have been wrong for over a decade.
Speaking of aliases, it's intereSting to note that "lawshark" is using another of his aliases
I haven't been here in months, and decided to stop by today to see which dumbsheeeeets are still here.
Whadya know. I found one.
Hey dopey. Don't give up your day job. Your future as a prognosticator of stock price is limited.
The stock is up from a split adjusted $7/share 11 years ago. You don't think the street knows that GILD management is shrewd?
"Ths is a M&A candidate if the PPS doesn't catch up soon."
Just who has the roughly $240 BILLION it would take to buy the company?
If your opinion actually meant anything, then your downward revision might mean something.
However, your opinion means nothing.
You're going to have to pump much, much harder. Your current pumping effort ain't working.
They sure do because it was announced over 6 months ago...
First of all, who is "we/"
Second you are a fool to believe GILD will be the third or fourth most valuable company in the world next year -- with less thanbf $30 billion in sales