I did the same. Hadn't looked at my GKK files for a long time. My records indicate that I started buying at 1.16, and included a buy at 0.46. My records also indicate that I didn't buy enough.
A very good synopsis of the attempt to rescue the Greek economic disaster. Fortunately, his political status induces bias/paranoid fear among a substantial group thats able to bring NBG down to interesting levels. I'm in here.
German banks still have the Greek skatar. German banks bought that rubbish knowing they had insurance....the German Government that would bail-out Greece if necessary. This situation remains.
Privatize profits, socialize losses.
The only job in the world where you get paid more for just doing your job, and if you don't do your job, you get paid none-the-less.
You've waited a long time in a short position, yes. You missed the last rally, yes. Bad investments are not marathons, they are errors.
Orchestrated scared mongering with the claim of "truth", where the truth here is no better exemplified by the tiny volume associated with the largish price decline.
A theory is a fasifiable premise, thus being one in regards to "the big bang". No religion has been able to falsify any scientific theory. I have no idea why they try, in that faith is completely independent.
Evolution is not a fact.
Rather, it is a theory that has held for many years, despite a concerted effort to disprove (falsify) it. As such, it is a sound theory warranting its teaching in schools. It is distinct from a precarious theory such as one that remains unfalsified only by the limitation of technology.
The process of natural selection is proven. Its application to the theory of evolution has held for many years, but can't be labelled an absolute fact.
I have yet to come across a Creationist who is able to discuss the application of natural selection to evolution.
"Your existence is proof that you were created by our Creator."
You need to read the bible properly. The existence of our Creator is a matter of faith, and thus cannot be proven. All you're doing by saying such untruths is providing fuel for Atheists.
"....obviously there was paperwork at some point that showed taxes were overpaid otherwise PR wouldn't have made the agreement in 2006 and revised agreement in 2012."
Not so obvious when you take into account that a person in tax department that may have assessed the claim, and constructed the repayment agreement, is now an employee of DRL
To correctly assess risk here, I believe, is assume shenanigans occurred and to understand the legal classification of such an event. Would it be 'simulation or illegal artifice' or 'misrepresentation of material fact' ?.
The Democratic governor's office argues that the agreement, signed under a previous administration, is null because Doral's supporting paperwork did not prove that the bank had overpaid its taxes.