The left group is trying very hard to get through your thick skull that they think the topic is of no interest at all.
Still no direct critiques of the criteria used to assess homosexuality as a normal (in context)?
Its fascination, not obsession, the left has with the irrational and hypocritical arguments of the right.
Your misdirected hatred makes you stupid.
You're too stupid to know that that idiotic question has already been answered....in numerous ways.
Again, because its mundanely normal and nobody is interested.
What an idiot you are.
Adding more is a clear indication of Attiva's belief that DRL will satisfy recapitilization requirements. The relative amounts added is immaterial.
lc is right, you don't provide any direct criticism of the investigations and research that concludes thatsame-sex sexual behaviors are normal variations of human sexuality.
Just tangential BS.
What an idiot you are.
Erm. You said "As Tsar says, OK "if it's two hot lezzies.""
If you weren't an idiot, you would know this indicates your corresponding belief.
Granted, It is pure speculation that day traders were involved, as is the comment "there were many people who believed DRL would get the money before the 120 days."
You're not that idiot that posted "DRL real value is $0.1455.... 1:20 reverse split 2013 july" are you?
I reiterate, the current situation and pps has nothing to do with previous reverse splits, and whether buy or short this stock.
Of course falsehoods look true to Conservatives. Thats why they're idiots. If you weren't an idiot, you would have clicked on the moniker and found out that it belongs to a member since June 7, 2006.
Just like the racists that demonize Blacks. Present the worst case scenario from certain individuals from a much larger group....the group they hate.
Its a very stupid argument, from a befitting person.
The spike came from day traders getting in on an oversold technical.
The current situation and pps has nothing to do with previous reverse splits.
The most important word in your post, and used twice, is 'have'. Ever heard of the phrase "Past Returns Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance"?
I'm not surprised you don't know that lesbianism is homosexuality, of which you are misguidedly opposed.
A long and vacuous post.
It was always highly unlikely that the tax refund was going to be refunded earlier than agreed, and was never a serious avenue for DRL to recapitalization. It is very unfortunate that DRL need to sell assets at discount prices, but they have assets to sell, such that default/insolvency is unlikely.
Also, it already has fallen below $2.