You're trying to hide the Steven's paper within "the peer reviewed papers by the Max Planck Institute" ? The paper who's author says exactly the opposite to what you're saying?
The conspiracy you propose is huge, and growing....now entering a significant level of judiciary rulings. Yet you continue, you big climate dummy.
Is there any source other than from Paul Craig Roberts and/or Dave Kranzler ?
What? No reference from an author who says exactly the opposite? You've only used 2 so far, you big climate dummy.
Big and thorough study.
ExxonMobil is now under investigation by the New York state attorney general for knowing about climate change decades ago, and then purposely lying and misleading the public and investors. The company has received a subpoena, an order issued by the government to provide the courts with financial records, emails, and other documents that relate to climate change.
I bet ExxonMobil won't come out as clean as Michael Mann did after the Virginia attorney general's investigation.
If you search for “unforeseen emergency refugee situation” you will get all the info you need. Arizona vs. United States also adds to your ignorance. But I expect you won't admit to being wrong.
Where's the evidence ?
"36 tonnes of gold was removed from the GLD Trust. " might be evidence, but why could this removal not be due to prior reductions in share holding?
Well at least you've learnt that the Fed is constitutional. Now you have to grasp the reason why the Fed exists. You see, if it didn't work, it wouldn't still be here. Simple really isn't it. You're not able to criticize the Fed, as exemplified by your call of high inflation in response to the Fed's action against the GFC, which hasn't occurred within the timeframe predicted, thus designating you wrong. This, and you're refusal to acknowledge it, warrants your exclusion from commenting on such maters.
Only a complete looney tune would see the Syrian refugees as all asylum seekers. The Paris attacks were calculated. Planting terrorists with the refugees induces exactly the kind on paranoid-fueled nonsense depicted in the above posts, and plays right into ISIS's hands.
Theres no study needed.
One only needs to see what happened prior to, and during the GFC.
Particularly idiotic, is their defiant belief that in times of recession the economy can count on rich people/industries to rescue the economy as they have forcefully argued, and continue to do so, even when these looney tunes stood and watched EVERY major company sit on their cash reserves during the GFC.
Its getting to you, isn't it?
As you continue to post BS, your evidence will continue to debunked until your presentation again boils down to just conspiracy theory.
What freedoms were lost after 9/11?
Climate/nuclear treaty-dummies wouldn't understand that a terrorist act outside the battlefield is an act induced by containment at the place of battle. You have just proven this to be the case.
I know that you know that they were contained. Their terrorist attacks in Paris proved it.
You're just lying. Something we saw a lot off under the last rightwing presidency.
IS said it has smuggled THOUSANDS of extremists into Europe. Their claim was calculated. Yet the true nature of the extent of terrorism within the Islamic community was exhibited with 0.0001%[?] of the refugees committing acts of terror.
If the borders where shut in response, or any maltreatment of the refugees were to have occurred, the terrorists would have succeeded. The terrorists want IS to be the refugees' only hope.
Your post encourages the terrorist's success.
So you're suggesting that NeoLibertarians are confused as to what constitutes political systems.
What a remarkable thought.