Sat, Jul 12, 2014, 12:04 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Pepco Holdings, Inc. Message Board

diligence2 8 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 9, 2014 7:18 PM Member since: May 5, 2011
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Did Exelon-Pepco deal news leak?
    By: Kevin McCoy May 1, 2014 11:11 am

    Did someone trade on advance news about Exelon’s $6.8 billion deal to buy Pepco Holdings? The analysts at Option Monster think so.

    Announced Wednesday, the tie-up between by Exelon, the largest U.S. nuclear industry operator, and Pepco, a Mid-Atlantic utility operator serving 2 million customers from Washington to New Jersey, would create the region’s largest electric and natural gas utility.

    Exelon agreed to buy Pepco for $27.25 a share. The news pushed Pepco shares up $3.97 to a $26.76 close Wednesday, the highest in a decade.

    In March, Pepco averaged 104 daily options contracts, across all expiration dates, according to Option Monster’s Jon Najarian.

    But on Monday, two days before the deal was publicly disclosed, volume soared to more than 4,000 call options contracts traded. Buying call options represents a financial bet that the company’s stock price will rise.

    “The bulk of that 4,000 calls was the May and Aug. 20 call options for $1.90 – $2.00,” Najarian wrote in his daily options blog. “Whoever did this took an $800,000 investment and turned it into $2,800,000 in 48 hours. I suspect we will see an SEC investigation into same shortly,” wrote Najarian.

    BTW, How Many Investors Sold @ 52 Wk. High on Monday or Tuesday?

  • Hang in there longs.

    If POM stock price keeps going up maybe Exelon will offer more money :).

    Hmm, Maybe even $29.25 :)

    Sentiment: Hold

  • diligence2 by diligence2 Jul 7, 2014 4:45 PM Flag

    Is Exelon-Pepco Deal A Sure Thing?

  • By Glenn Williams | May 05, 2014 | 5:00 PM EDT | 2





    Email Email

    Print Print


    Stock quotes in this article: exc, pom, d, duk, etr, itc

    Last week, Exelon (EXC) surprised investors by announcing its intention to buy Pepco Holdings (POM). Intentions are one thing, and execution is another. I believe the odds of Exelon's deal closing are less than 50%.

    Many investors think of Exelon as a play on deregulated nuclear power. There is a good reason. Exelon operates 23 nuclear generating units at 14 locations in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, New York, New Jersey and Maryland. The 23 units have the capability to generate 22,000 megawatts of nuclear power, which is far more than any other investor-owned utility.

    While Exelon is a nuclear utility, it is also a local distribution company and a world-class energy services company. It owns and operates three separate local distribution utilities in Illinois, Pennsylvania and Maryland. These subsidiaries are fully regulated, and each earns a government-guaranteed return.
    ComEd is a regulated electric distribution company, and it is one of Illinois' largest utilities. It owns more than 70,000 miles of electric transmission and distribution systems. It serves 3.8 million electric customers.
    PECO is a regulated gas and electric distribution company, and it is one of Pennsylvania's largest utilities. It owns more than 29,000 miles of electric transmission and distribution systems. It also owns 6,600 gas lines. It serves 1.6 million electric and 490,000 natural gas customers.
    BGE is a regulated gas and electric distribution company, and it is Maryland's largest utility. It owns more than 26,000 miles of electric transmission and distribution systems. It also owns 7,100 gas lines. It serves 1.2 million electric customers and 655,000 natural gas customers.

    Combining ComEd, PECO and BGE provides Exelon with a large footprint in the regulated utility business. Considering that Exelon previously announced plans to retire several of its 23 nuclear units, the company's investment profile would change to that of a predominantly regulated utility. Buying Pepco Holdings would cement that change, and if the deal is successful, it would diminish Exelon's exposure to the merchant nuclear power business.

    On the surface, it makes sense. Exelon appears to be following the lead set by Dominion Resources (D) and Duke Energy (DUK); they appear to be dumping merchant assets and running for regulatory cover.

    Pepco Holdings is a relatively simple enterprise. It has limited exposure to merchant power. It owns three separate local distribution companies and a small energy service company.
    Pepco is a regulated electric distribution company. Its franchise covers the District of Columbia and portions of Maryland.
    Delmarva Power and Light is a regulated gas and electric distribution company. Its franchise covers the portions of Maryland and Delaware.
    Atlantic City Electric is a regulated electric distribution company. Its franchise covers southern New Jersey.
    On a combined basis, transmission and distribution systems owned by Pepco Holdings consists of about 4,600 circuit miles of transmission, 35,000 circuit miles of distribution, a liquefied natural gas facility, 100 pipeline miles of natural gas transmission mains, 1,800 pipeline miles of natural gas distribution mains and 1,300 pipeline miles of natural gas service lines.

    Here is the interesting part. All three of Pepco Holdings' regulated utilities operate adjacent to two of Exelon's regulated utilities: PECO and BGE.

    On the surface, it seems like a marriage made in heaven. Pepco Holdings' footprint snuggles neatly into Exelon's service area like pieces in a puzzle. That presents the opportunity and the hurdle for Exelon.

    However, for this merger to close, a long chain of approvals is required. Included are shareholder approvals from both companies, federal approval and states' approvals. As Entergy (ETR) and ITC Holdings (ITC) learned, any single failure in that chain would prevent the deal from closing.

    If you think you have seen this movie before, you are right. When Exelon acquired BGE's parent company in 2012, the state of Maryland threatened to disapprove unless Exelon paid a heavy price.

    However, that is not the original screenplay. Pepco tried to merge with BGE in 1995. That merger failed. Again, Maryland was the problem. As The Baltimore Sun reported, "BGE and Pepco claimed that the corporate marriage would save $1.3 billion, savings that they hoped to split evenly between customers and shareholders. [Maryland] Regulators, however, ordered BGE and Pepco to give customers 75 percent of the savings." Because Maryland attempted to harvest most of the merger's benefits, BGE and Pepco called their deal off.

    In addition, Pepco Holding' financials are chronically weak. Cash flow from operations has been declining. The company's payout ratio has been chronically unhealthy. Its only unregulated subsidiary, Pepco Energy Services, has a decade-long disappointment.

    Pepco Holdings' prospects for improving its financial condition are slight. State regulators hold most of the keys to the company's financial health, and they have been unwilling to rubber-stamp rate increases.

    What is striking is Exelon's timing. It has been warning about the health of its nuclear fleet, saying that it could be retiring perfectly good nuclear plants because those plants cannot achieve earnings. At the same time that Exelon warns of potentially massive write-downs in its nuclear business, it announce its intentions to buy Pepco.

    It seems that Pepco Holdings shareholders might want to exit now. The Exelon-Pepco deal is not going to get any better. In fact, the tough news has yet to arrive. This merger is not a slam-dunk.

  • diligence2 diligence2 Apr 29, 2014 9:50 PM Flag

    Pepco Holdings Inc (NYSE:POM)

    Book Value Per Share

    $17.28 (As of Dec. 2013)

    Pepco Holdings Inc's book value per share for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2013 was $17.28.

    During the past 12 months, Pepco Holdings Inc's average Book Value Per Share Growth Rate was -10.00% per year. During the past 3 years, the average Book Value Per Share Growth Rate was -2.80% per year. During the past 5 years, the average Book Value Per Share Growth Rate was -1.80% per year.

    Pepco Holdings Inc (NYSE:POM)
    Tangible Book Value Per Share

    $11.64 (As of Dec. 2013)

    Tangible book value per share is calculated as the total tangible equity divided by Shares Outstanding. Total tangible equity is calculated as the total equity minus preferred stock minus intangibles. Pepco Holdings Inc's tangible book value per share for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2013 was $11.64.

    Since intangibles such as goodwill cannot be sold when the company liquidates, tangible book value per share is considered more accurate in reflecting how much shareholders will receive when the company liquidates.

  • diligence2 diligence2 Apr 29, 2014 4:46 PM Flag

    CreditSights indicates aprox. $21.00 - $22.00 would be price at which POM would be purchased.
    Who knows:).

  • When Will Interest on US National Debt Exceed $1 Trillion? When Will the Fed Hike Rates?
    With all the talk of tapering and expected hikes in interest rates by the Fed, inquiring minds are likely interested in what happens to interest on the national debt if the Fed ever does hike.

    One of the most important reasons the Fed is determined to keep interest rates low is one that is rarely talked about, and which comprises a dark economic foreboding that should frighten us all.
    How about the average interest rate the Treasury paid on U.S. debt over the last 20 years?

    That rate is 5.7percent, not extravagantly high at all by historic standards.

    Do the math: If we were to pay an average interest rate on our debt of 5.7 percent, rather than the 2.4 percent we pay today, in 2020 our debt service cost will be about $930 billion.

    Now compare that to the amount the Internal Revenue Service collects from us in personal income taxes.

    In 2012, that amount was $1.1 trillion, meaning that if interest rates went back to a more normal level of, say, 5.7 percent, 85 percent of all personal income taxes collected would go to servicing the debt. No wonder the Fed is worried. Shifting Goalposts

    Really think the Fed is going to hike? They know they can't, and the Fed is disingenuous as to why.

    A year ago the Fed was discussing 6.5% as a trigger point.
    Now, in the wake of a massive collapse in the labor force in which unemployment rate just dropped to 6.7% it's easy to understand why the goalposts shifted.

    The Fed pretends its interest rate policy is about a dual mandate of jobs and GDP growth.

    The Fed is in a box of its own making and it has no freaking idea how to get out of the box.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • California has been a champion of solar incentive programs and so far, those policies have largely worked: the state is home to more than half of all rooftop solar projects in the country.

    But they may have worked a little too well in one respect. As increasing numbers of Californians generate their own electricity, they rely less on electric utilities and that’s raising major questions about the future of California’s utilities.

    The utility business model has been largely the same for decades. Utilities build transmission lines, deliver power to customers and recover those costs via your monthly bill.

    So it’s not hard to see why a customer like Chuck Pershing might make utilities nervous. “This is from PG&E,” he says, digging through a folder of bills. “Electric is $4.73. Here’s another which was $5.01.”

    Chuck and his wife Suzanne Pershing pay next-to-nothing to Pacific Gas & Electric because of the solar panels atop their four-bedroom house in San Leandro. On a sunny afternoon, the panels are cranking out power – more than the couple are actually using. That extra power goes onto PG&E’s grid, where it supplies other homes.

    “You can see where it says ‘received,” says Pershing, pointing to his electric meter. “So PG&E is receiving from us right now 4.32 kilowatts per hour.” PG&E keeps track of this and credits the Pershings on their bill. While they still have to buy electricity from PG&E at night when there’s no sun, it’s effectively cancelled out by the extra power they feed back to PG&E during the day.

    It’s called “net energy metering” and it helps solar projects like this one make financial sense. “It’s great,” says Pershing, who says he can’t resist going outside and checking the meter daily.

    The Death Spiral

    “The real concern is that as we move toward higher and higher levels of renewable power on the customer side, we’re going to see bigger shortfalls and the utilities are going to have to raise more revenue,” says Severin Borenstein, an energy economist at UC Berkeley.

    Here’s the catch: as utilities raise electricity prices, it encourages more of their customers to go solar. That equals an even bigger shortfall and utilities raise prices again. It quickly becomes what Bornstein calls a “death spiral.”

    “Even for those who hate utilities, it’s not a death spiral that should make them happy because none of these solar customers are really energy independent,” says Borenstien. “They still require having a grid.”

    The Public Utilities Commission is expected to release its net-metering analysis by the end of the summer. Many say whatever regulators decide to do, it will set a precedent not just for solar customers in California, but for the solar industry across the country

    Sentiment: Buy

27.80+0.10(+0.36%)Jul 11 4:03 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Potbelly Corporation
NasdaqGSFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
NasdaqGSFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
MGIC Investment Corp.
NYSEFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:01 PM EDT