Sorry to disappoint you but I am not kenbrizel and kenbrizel is not me. Very clearly cut and pasted one of my past responses to one of the spam sheets that keeps posting hoping someone besides yourself, jda, will subscribe. If you read its post, it makes no sense in the context that the original posting extolling the virtues of pennyshitsweekly made no mention of the Yahoodies. You would not have an attention span long enough to figure that out, however. Kenbrizel has been a Yahoodie for seven years and has posted all of two times.
How's that for "effete"?
No sooner asked than done! Way to go, LitePee! On another big up day for the broader market, too.
Hey jda/OopsticalBust! Who's the one eating crow?
Dunham at last count is only 59 yrs old. Sulick's 65 is not necessarily old and overdue for the pasture when it comes to CEOs. I don't disagree with the thesis that DYSL is a cold old turd, but get your facts correct.
On the other hand, you, jad254/OopsticalBust, were preparing a dish of crow for me to eat about a month and 15% ago...
Dunham seems to have skipped around all over the place. Now near the end of a fruitless career, he headed back "home" to Ithaca NY, where he went to school (Cornell), which is probably how he stumbled onto Clarity Corporate Growth last August (Clarity is the M&A firm mentioned). Clarity's M&A activity appears mostly centered on low-tech businesses and they no longer list Dunham as either one of their professionals nor a resource.
One supposes that Dunham's ongoing relationship with DYSL could put him in a position to engineer a deal that would combine that company with LitePee. This of course would help line his otherwise empty pockets, but other than that all it would accomplish is to give the comical appearance of two drunks holding each other up underneath the streetlamp.
Well, jda254, 2,100 shares came in at the end of the day to push the pps down one whole penny, to the day's low and ten cents down from yesterday. I think you have "tape painting" confused with "face painting."
Well it would be easy to say that, nomis, except that it would not be true. In point of fact, I'm pretty good at this. Whatever "this" is...
I'm never on the wrong side. Doesn't mean I haven't taken losses, but when an investment is not going my way, I find out why and if it is because of my misinterpretation of the fundamentals, then it gets chopped out of the portfolio.
Not trying to teach you anything. You are too dumb -- nothing would sink in. I'll bet a doorstop could replace you at work.
A company can lie all day and all night, to its investors and even to itself, about earnings. But cash is real. A company can operate for a long time with negative earnings, but when cash flow goes negative, that is when managements mount the steps to bankruptcy court. Only one company in history that I know of ever filed a Ch. 11 petition with positive cash flow. Johns Manville Corp was buried under a flood of asbestos lawsuits.
Willing to bet my daily gains and losses are greater than your entire account. I do not depend on "luck" when it comes to stock selection -- just solid research.
Refer back to my question put to you about your apparent inability to comprehend a written statement. Is your attention span so short that you forget what was at the beginning of a five-word sentence after reading the first three? Your statements and "barbs" directed at me make no sense whatsoever.