Neither the FDA nor the SEC will entertain delisting because of an obviously grossly manipulated and artificial share price.
ONCY will absolutely not be de-listed while there is any trial data still to be finalized, analyzed and published. PERIOD.
The premises otherwise are ridiculous.
dlackey "LOL - I seriously have to laugh at you donpoffenroth.|
Well it's always good to keep your spirits high.
dlackey, what you have been "discussing" is your imagined situation of ONCY investors who you imagine have been "burned".
You actually have absolutely no knowledge of what, when and why anyone other than yourself are doing with ONCY or any other stock.
In short you are simply taking potshots and hoping that you might hit on someone who might sell some shares to you. Otherwise you would be gorging on your KITE investment opp. and be way too busy to agitate here.
I remind you that ONCY did trade at near $20 at one time and there have been innumerable opportunities to play the stock.
Yes indeed ONCY goes up and down. w
Where did you ever get the idea that you are the only one who makes money whenever it does so, in ONCY or any other stock?
And where did you ever get the idea that you are good at stock picking? What you hold out as your idea of cherry picking can be consistently outrun 10 fold by anyone with a VectorVest account.
Grow up and get a life.
No dlackey, it's you who are missing the point.
This is a message board for Oncolytics.
It is you who has been for years a constant pain-in-the#$%$ promoter of anything but ONCY.
Take it somewhere else.
"Anything to make a buck and scam a DNGI"
I understand that's how you work.
So Slug, how many more shares do you think you still need to make the bucks you hope to?
You don't have the slightest insight into what other people are doing, you just have your (overactive) imagination that you are somehow unique and smarter.
You are not.
Others don't share your opinion of yourself
You are seen as just an amused idiot.
How is what others do or don't do with their own money any of your business or of your slightest concern?
You cannot have failed to realise that you are largely viewed as intrusive flatulence here.
Get on with your own life and affairs and leave others to do what they wish.
I do understand that your constant and deliberate wandering rants between market strategies, financings, market manipulation and "sympathy" for ONC shareholder serves your primary purpose of disruption of the this MB.
So do others understand that, and you look even more the fool for it.
Focus on trial results for REO 016 and REO 021.
Guffaw all you like.
You obviously have a much different life situation and goal than I .
I support worthwhile ideas, you need an annual return.
We live in different worlds, and sadly you constantly show it.
armd ,"I bet the dimwit is progressive"
The the dimwit race has a mandatory progressive trait, and often other serious social flaws.
PS dlackey, when you laugh at me do you do a har- har or tee-hee?
How long has $#!thead" been a "race"?
Please address the actual facts, realities and percentages.
1). appearing in ONC's 10/18/2013 PR regarding REO 016, NSCLC Stage IV cancer patients and
2). appearing in ONC's 10/18/2013 PR regarding REO 021, SCCLC.
"My only guess is.." "Which makes even less sense"
dlackey, you admit to not being a shareholder nor even wanting to be one, you admit that you only guess, and you admit to not understanding the conspiracy that you are guessing about.
So there's not much to recommend your opinion about anything , right?
" I wonder what you are doing here."
That's a good question, nome.
The answer is that there is a 'study' group headed up in Ontario who are giddy at the thought of killing ONC by any means whatsoever, with the objective of acquiring assets from the (seemingly outward) basket-case they have so worked so hard to help create.
bailey: "..ONCY's reovirus would be able to used Off-Label.."
I would much rather see use of Reolysin restricted to "approved" indications.
I'm not so sure that every MD ( face it, like in every profession, some are cowboys) should be allowed to use Reolysin outside of approved indications and perhaps windup screwing up a long term and undeniably legitimate and valuable position in cancer treatment through misuse or misapplication due to ignorance or misunderstanding of the proper place of Reolysin in the overall medical arsenal against cancer.
Personally, I'm more interested in reovirus being used correctly than used universally. That said. I do believe that the reovirus will ultimately be very widely applicable, and used (just not at the beginning).
I can see why someone would be attracted to a company that has a 'Nappy Cream' in its product line.
Cancer biologics just aren't in the same league, are they?
Reolysin is frozen, to -20 C for storage I recall, with up to 20 year shelf life.
PS: Reolysin isn't a drug, it's a biologic (many characteristics far, far removed from any drug)