cloudy_day_jane, the loser, the coward. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Such an easily predictable reply there, jane. Get back to what you said, that I own no shares, you slithering coward, you can't participate in the phone call. Dance for me, loser. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Get shook that low? Can't tell you how factsarefactsare suffered or benefitted. Pretty much outside our conversation. So you have it in your head that I own zero shares. How'd you arrive at that misconception? Better yet would you like to do a conference call arranged by a live person, a phone operator to dial while you listen? My broker will tell you I do own shares in that convo, you board trash monkey. But to do that and to prove you wrong, how much are you willing to lose in a gentleman's bet? You may not be able to afford to lose $100, and that's not enough for me to waste my time and effort with you. Minimum wager, $1,000. Got bucks, jello brain? Offer some idiot reason why you won't bet. Hurry!
Pretending only makes you look dumber than you've already proven to be. In your make-believe world, I sound offended. My emotions, offended or not have nothing to do with historical quotes, available right here at Yahoo Finance for the first week of June, 2015. June 2 was the high for the week, $3.05. $2.76 the low for that week, June 1. Which leads to the question, do you not understand "it never traded below $2.50" the first week of June and how with today's close being much lower, it's easy to see your claim that QTWW has never been worth more, that claim is worm-brained. How many worms are crawling around in your head? What excuse do you have for being as stupid as you are now? Now pretend I'm upset LOL !
Sentiment: Strong Buy
how does anyone with even three-quarters of a brain say that this company is worth more now than before? Is it possible knowin2holdem has less than three-quarters of a normal brain? Did his mother drop him from the second story window when he was a child? something wrong with that dude.
$100 paid, no not I, someone else paid. Was it some insider painting off the ask? I believe it was. A monumental $100 worth of confidence @ .0001. SCAM ALERT!
I had to check. I went to Nasdaq and they have 10 year charting available. The chart is reliable since Nasdaq does adjust the share price to account for splits; reverse splits in this case. Charted throughout all of '08, the share price never went below $25. You are the most clueless person to have posted that the shares are worth more now than in 2008. Anyone and everyone should have you on ignore.
Friday's action signals a probable BK filing before the end of the year. Another big reason shorts won't cover is when a company files BK all profits by way of shorting, those profits a free of taxation. Too bad longs.