Dec 4, 2014 11:17 AM to be exact.
this ibmwatcher pump & dump is doing GREAT
New Bagholders !!!
You following me over to CGEN when I was warning about overvaluation both in the third week of Sept 2014 and later in Oct, you came over to post that I should be ignored. Thing is tho, those that took heed and bailed, saved themselves losses. It not about any other aliases, you brainless dope.
She is such a dweeb, but not a woman IMO. cloudy_day_jane look up dweeb in the Urban Dictionary. BTW, cloudy_day_jane 10/12/14 2:46 pm at CGEN posted - double05 hasn't a clue, ignore him. That was on a thread I initiated. My 10/10 message jane replied to was, 9 - 24 - 2014 Brace Yourselves BAGGIES Down she goes. Care to see how stupid jane was to criticize me? Open a 1 year chart of CGEN. Hey jane, you have fun now you hear, honey. It's no wonder you're called the board idiot.
cloudy_day_jane, the loser, the coward. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Such an easily predictable reply there, jane. Get back to what you said, that I own no shares, you slithering coward, you can't participate in the phone call. Dance for me, loser. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Get shook that low? Can't tell you how factsarefactsare suffered or benefitted. Pretty much outside our conversation. So you have it in your head that I own zero shares. How'd you arrive at that misconception? Better yet would you like to do a conference call arranged by a live person, a phone operator to dial while you listen? My broker will tell you I do own shares in that convo, you board trash monkey. But to do that and to prove you wrong, how much are you willing to lose in a gentleman's bet? You may not be able to afford to lose $100, and that's not enough for me to waste my time and effort with you. Minimum wager, $1,000. Got bucks, jello brain? Offer some idiot reason why you won't bet. Hurry!
Pretending only makes you look dumber than you've already proven to be. In your make-believe world, I sound offended. My emotions, offended or not have nothing to do with historical quotes, available right here at Yahoo Finance for the first week of June, 2015. June 2 was the high for the week, $3.05. $2.76 the low for that week, June 1. Which leads to the question, do you not understand "it never traded below $2.50" the first week of June and how with today's close being much lower, it's easy to see your claim that QTWW has never been worth more, that claim is worm-brained. How many worms are crawling around in your head? What excuse do you have for being as stupid as you are now? Now pretend I'm upset LOL !
Sentiment: Strong Buy