From OV Board by tonoos:
" You're correct on both counts.
Words fly, and we reasonably discern if true or not. Some people know things and they tell other people. Some people see the book and know who's who.
I have now put the yahooligan on ignore, he must be drinking heavily today!
He can't back up any of his drivel, he sure seems angry!
I'm fairly certain Tang was shorting and fairly certain PM never shorted navb, and I sure would not go on and on ad nauseam accusing people of doing what I can't prove!"
Yes, Paly is unhappy and quite insecure...can't keep that hidden, the word is out for all to see. Nasty, ill-willed, and self absorbed...that's our Paly!!!
You can't even get the fact that pup and I are two different people so I can only expect so much from your quick mind and intellect. Saltine, Paly.
Nah, I am not that invested in dialogue with you but am heavily invested in navb. Let me know when you can prove something other than your ego need.
RDX...seems you have said that before...maybe your subliminal thoughts are rising to the surface...get a new theme.
From IV Board:
" I don't repeatedly accuse people and companies of doing something that I can't prove.
I can prove PM has sold shares on occasions, but I can't prove they have ever shorted navb stock so I never accuse them of it.
See the difference?
I posted my hypotheses in response to a query without attacking any entity.
I'm sure you have suspicions and that is your right, but you don't need to repeatedly accuse them since you can't prove it."
Face it, Paly, you cannot prove your rants, yet you "speak" like you know something. Conjecture is all you got...crackerhead. Now like a good little girl...Paly says, "IMHO, IMHO, IMHO." Squawk, squawk....
I am sure you would...can't see past your own ego...IMHO...hmmm...where have we read that before...oh yeah, paly the parrot...squawk, squawk...look at me.
From IV Board by tonoos:
I strongly disagree with your theory that PM is or ever has shorted navb stock.
I can't prove it but it is a very educated hypothesis of mine.
I wish you would stop promulgating that wild theory of yours which is pure guesswork on your part and I believe borne of your personal frustrations of holding this stock so long without cashing in and by forgoing vast paper profits you once had.
Regardless of why you constantly post it, I'm confident you are wrong and I believe unless you can factually prove it you should stop it.
"Risk-managed returns" can and probably does simply mean selling shares from time to time at high prices!
Remember the SI report is only a snapshot in time and does not reflect the millions of shares shorted and covered in the period. When I type "the shorts are big traders" that is my allusion.
Peace and I hope you stay healthy as well.
Paly...tried to refrain but your self-indulgent, meandering, confusing bs is just too much. Yeah, so blast back but it is what it is. Write like normal people.
From IV Board:
T: thanks for sharing and you certainly provide clarity relative to the strategy that is the focus of the thread "Re: I'm going to show my ignorance but there are a lot of smart people on this board so I want to take advantage of that." in all honesty i have failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt(obviously above my pay grade) that PM(a hedge fund) would participate in said time honored strategy relative to NAVB . inmho PM does believe in/support NAVB and up/until said belief/support realises a significant gain via their eventual static long term common hold it is my contention that PM will continue any/all legal trading strategies so as to earn a profit for their customers as reflected on their b/s, good for PM, its customers as well. glta.
Paly...hmmmm...seems you describe many of your own personal attributes in your sefl-indukgent monologue...get some help girly girl!!!
Duh...teach me how to read, Paly. Please, u r so nice.
Granularity is the extent to which a system is broken down into small parts, either the system itself or its description or observation. It is the extent to which a larger entity is subdivided. Wikipedia
But then agian, some people make things up to suit them as needed. Nice try, Paly.
Nah, paly has poor command of the English language and has been taken to task on both boards. But we need to be acceping of those who are different..perhaps understanding will help them become a bette person.
Hey paly...did you know other people know how to read?...why don't you cut and paste something we don't know..