So what happened to all those voices claiming last week's low number had so much significance? As predicted, it didn't. This week brings the scripts back to trend. They may deviate for a week or two again, up or down, but the trend upward remains intact.
The boring, or should I say obnoxious, thing is that whogo always deletes posts where facts prove his predictions wrong. And he often claims to have bought before a runup, but the claim is made after the runup. Such posts are worthless, and such posts are not just boring but obnoxious.
The decision in favor of Medac has ALREADY come and gone. That was the INITIAL court decision, it's in appeal now. The market has ALREADY priced this result in ATRS share price. There is only UPSIDE potential now, huge upside should ATRS win on appeal or settle in some favorable way.
I also want to point out that, just I predicted when it was 1.90, once this stock started an uptrend, the bashers would either disappear (as in stinkydog) or flip to promoting the stock instead of bashing it (as in camry and whogo). I've seen this movie before many times on the stocks I buy, nothing new under the sun.
The attractiveness of ATRS as an acquisition has been mentioned before. This should be a short's worst nightmare. Wake up one morning to a press release announcing ATRS is being bought out for a 50% or 100% premium over the current PPS and suffer a huge loss covering your short. Especially painful if insufficient equity in their account to cover the entire amount due.
My guess is, if the pps were presently 1.2, you'd be saying it isn't more than 2 right now. And if it were 3.2, you'd be saying it isn't worth more than 4 right now. In other words, you have no basis in what you claim it's worth, you judge that entirely by where the present pps is.
Well, from what I've seen, lokodaug provides good data inputs (albeit speculative) which I find valuable. I can't see he's pumping anything and I appreciate his posts.
In each case the perp was guilty of SOMETHING, but that did not mean they deserved to die. There are ways of stopping even armed people without killing them. The police are not trained or equipped to stop perps using non-lethal means, and THAT is the problem, not just "hindsight". This is not a racial thing. There are other cases, like a homeless unarmed white guy illegally living on a New Mexico public desert hill that was chased down and killed by a half dozen officers because he wouldn't climb down the hill fast enough or didn't obey their orders fast enough. Did he deserve to die? Maybe he was mentally ill, many homeless are. There are ways to disable perps without killing them. You can kill many people by wrestling them to the ground such that they can't breathe, that happens a lot. Six police officers should be able to bring an unarmed guy down a hill without killing him.
So, I guess this means you sold and are trying to push it down so you can re-load.
Yes, and a 2016 estimate of .32 for 2016 is completely reasonable. Margins are close to 90% on Otrexup, and revenue goes almost entirely to earnings once past breakeven. With earnings of .32, this stock would easily be above 5, maybe closer to 10 if earnings are still growing quickly when present earnings become .32 for a year.
Interesting, so that's your claim, Otrexup will never do more than $50 million peak. I'll take a screen shot of this post and remember your prediction for future reference.
No, you didn't prove that. Waiting to see "acceleration in sales" is a fallacy. They already have increasing sales. If there is a sudden jump in sales, the price of the stock won't wallow around waiting for you to buy in, it will gap up. Gaps to the upside in price are a short's worst nightmare, because there is no limit to how much or how fast they can lose their money, and the stock can give no opportunity to cover at a lower price.
It's not "obvious" Otrexup will not be a huge money maker. The only thing obvious to me is that it is too early to conclude anything about how large a money maker Otrexup will be.
blues_fanatic, another spot on comment. I set here accumulating ATRS every nickel down, buying more volume each nickel down, and getting trashed on daily by whogo, camry and some #$%$ named stinkydog (who's now of course long gone). I never deleted my posts where I said where I bought, starting from above 3. I'm proud of my strategy, I'm now green on it (earlier than I had hoped), and expect to make my customary 50 to100% profit on my overall shares within a couple years total from when I bought my first share. So, it isn't just boring but also obnoxious to see the way that trio post #$%$ and then delete the trash where they are proven wrong (like the predictions of falling to below 1.5).
Well, strong buy time was when it was 1.90. But whogo, camry, and stinkydog were saying it was going lower at that time. Only now, AFTER it has already gone up over 15% from that level is recognition sitting in that it's put in lasting low and is going higher. But I was sticking my neck out buying at 1.90, posting in real time that I was doing so, and getting ridiculed for doing so.
Uh, you said it is "nothing more than $50 MM annualized", meaning will NEVER be more than that. NEVER is a lot longer than a "LONG time". So, now you seem to be back pedaling. And your June post about never seeing any news about TEVA relationship has already proven to be false.
I now have way more ATRS than I planned on, but this is as close to a sure thing as exists. End of Q selling by institutions ends today. I'll sell these 1.85 shares back to the market above 1.9, probably wait for 1.95 or 2.00
I only wish I had had an order in even lower, I thought they'd spike it down at the end of the day, my next buy order was at 1.80