Yeah, its because your dumazz Auburn taggers couldn't hold a lead after scoring with 80 seconds left and cost me $300. For the real answer, read on!
Or else it is the fact that it took us 30 million shares and weeks to build to from 48 to 55 and only 4 million shares and 90 minutes for the market makers to take it back down. Why is that? because that is what the MMs do, they carefully let a stock run and bleed out the demand with one hundredth of a cent asks all the while naked short selling the #$%$ out of the stock. Then they look at the level 2 for stop losses and when they find a nice vulnerability after bleeding the demand for shares they pounce and cause idjits to sell or get stopped out at ridiculously low levels. Longs never make it as hard for the MM's to play their games as it is for us to capture gains. Want to know how long it will take to get back up to mid 50s? Absent of news, as long as it did before, so they can get their shares back as cheaply as possible! How do they do that? by scaring off any new retail investors for at least a week or so.
Want to end this BS? The answer has been given here several times before but no one wants to hear it.
Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.
The more they bash and the more aliases that show up, the greater the fear. EP further validation today at ONCS , thus the.garbage. It is one of the best buy signals around.
A few fluff PRs about website launches in 4 months, that is it. Even the groundhog came out this month. CEO is a ghost. Unless they put out some great numbers, time for a change, what respectable analyst wants to cover this when there is no attempt to provide even a smidgen of information? No wonder they can't get a decent valuation, no sales skills at the top. Howe about it #$%$!
Yeah, it trends down, until it doesn't. I got 10 k at 1.67 today tried to get 20 k, no such luck.
Trend is up from here.
Came close as it looks like it fell to 1.70 after that filled but never came all the way back. Love this play, especially with such low float could be explosive!!
Nicely explained. Open this up to institutional investors and it will move more quickly and get more exposure than this Yahoo board can provide.
Are you friggin kidding me? Who the hell are you. This is not investors hub where you get to be moderator. The fact is the two are highly comparable and anyone with half a brain knows the impact of one's success on the other. So one doofus on this board says ONCS is into cancer so they are better than INO and no one is to call them on it. I'm glad that guy did or I would have. I own both too, and I know the pros and cons of both. Bottom line ONCS has greater momentum now and should be a big winner gap for us, but INO is the holy grail further out due to the depth of their pipeline AND the fact that they OWN the electrporation technology.
INO is extremely important to ONCS . I am anticipating ONCS's chart and run is about to mimic what INO did this past summer. Enjoy the run.
One comment, look at what INO did this week, It is because the company is 1) excellent and 2) it is above a dollar. If it had been at 60 cents this month it would not have gotten that type of run. Institutions bought with a vengeance because they could. When we get to a dollar that will happen for us too. ONCS is excellent, it is is just not above a dollar, yet. HNY all !