1. not seeing dubai as any location for server. only see greece or networksolutions (india)
2. why cant you trust w3snoop?
never knew about the snoop website. i usually would use similarweb. similarweb is a month lagging though, so you can compare the 2 if youd like.
maybe, just maybe (this is pie-in-the-sky thinking) since mgage took nearly all velti assets on the cheap, they are in a few year turnaround where velti continues to work with mgage and together they sell the whole %%%% thing for 300m.
no one cares if you sell. no one is asking you to sell. try presenting some facts . the boogeyman isnt trying to steal your shares. my GOD!
a "possible" reason the stock wasnt "cancelled" could be due to the shareholders who bought prior to 8/13 being able to recover a dime or so per share. beyond that, it doesnt "require" much for a company (or shell) to continue to trade on pinks. they just have to provide 1 unaudited disclosure per year and the costs are very minimal compared to Nasdaq. additionally, it provides liquidity for employees who are "in the know" to cash out on the market if they had to, (even if its 1.5c per share.)
i realize this is all pessimistic, but at some point, you have to be responsible for your "investment" and look at it for what it is. some may "give it" 2 years, some 20 years. it all depends. pumpers will thumbs down anything regarding pessimism and bashers will bash for whatever reason. its good to look from both sides
if you are interested in partial BK cases, follow me over at VELTF. the parent company never filed BK, its a worldwide operation that only US/UK went BK.
we havent heard any news in over a year though, but the board is semi-active and Im 490K long at a .24/share lol
as in the case of Dendreon (DNDNQ), they sold what was thought of by 99% of longs as a 3B company at auction. turns out it was sold for 490 million, 200 million shy of the amount of debt. the hundreds of millions of NOLs were also bought for 15M. grand theft. my point is that in that case, there were also no other competing bids.
i wonder what happens next here.
Im a bit confused on the wording of this (good find BTW)
first paragraph mentions "underwriters" misleading investors? when was that ever mentioned before? so securities holders were filing suit against underwriters and not velti itself?
the 2nd paragraph contradicts the first (in my understanding). this one suggests securities holders were filing suit against velti (and not underwriters).
so which got sued? both? and both tossed out? this is good how exactly (just asking). will the veil ever be lifted for velti and where they are progress wise and showing a bit of transparency?
got me thinking
USA is under mGage control
Middle East , ISIS garbage
Russia/ukraine previous thread
China not acknowledged
GREECE , some weird R&D projects that probably are with Vci and not "us"
Cyprus / braZil nothing to talk about
and the CEO stating on his LinkedIn he is a school teacher now?
is there anything even left here?
please, factual answers only, not pie in the sky hopes and dreams
can't say that's a bad idea even as a standalone. good luck to you. ps let us know if your block goes through
not hard to believe. money talks. it's easy to make a couple million go "missing"