"Could see 20!" " A twenty bagger!" "going to the moon!" blah blah blah god I get tired of the idiotic pumping. . .
I hate it when people used deceptive headers to their post. You don't know if there is a buyout in the works, so don't pretend one may be coming.
Irrelevant. Script numbers are the relevant metric. Personally, I don't care about this week or that week -- I care what is happening 6-12 months hence.
Perhaps you can try countering the analysis rather than just blathering. Let me put it in simple terms -- the trend is my friend. Not the week to week bumpiness, but the trend.
Not a regular poster on this board, but I have been having posting problems as well under my usual ID. Strange.
Wow -- that crosses all sorts of ethical lines. It is one thing to write a scientific article evaluating the science, but as a scientist a) one should note potential conflicts of interest explicitly b) one should not descend into judgment calls like calling NWBO science "quackery" c) one should not short.