Should have an announcement today (Monday) for a Thursday, May 5th MT CC based on what was stated on the 4-18 CC, right?
So no change as it fluctuates up and down small amounts such as it did again here. More up than down but always small amounts so just no change is the outcome.
You say you've bought a lot of shares, which is relative to what a person thinks is a lot of shares, but how many approx.? 10K, 100K, 150K, 200K? Approx. how many and did you buy most all of them many years ago or you've bought many to add to your shares in the last 1-2 yrs? Did you participate in supporting DDBuyer and providing your share count to him for his effort? Interested.
It's a gamble I agree but my point is... many are investing with more than they can afford to lose which is something people shouldn't do but they are in this case, which again... is my point. Yet you say they shouldn't do it.... my point... but they are doing it. That's all I am saying.
So do you own a lot of shares? Have you grown your shares a lot over the years or held firm all along the way with the same amount of shares or mostly the same amount of shares? You are one of those that have lost a lot of opportunity investment gains due to NAVB being such a poor long-term investment over these 15+ years. As a trader and a GOOD trader, there's been a lot of opportunities over the years but not as a LT investor. So what is your story? Interested.
alinvestor..... agreed that patience is needed and NAVB has already proven the need to be patient based just on the past 5 to 7 years much less the Old-timers and some others that have been invested for 15+ years. But the, "have money you don't need now to use and more likely will loose" (think you mean lose). The last aspect of, "more likely will lose" is not what many are doing. Just look at the number of shares owned per DDBuyers efforts. Owning more than 25,000 shares at a $1 to $3 cost leads to an amount nobody can afford to lose, especially, when you look at the large shares owned.
So many investors are investing big and with money they can't afford to lose without big consequences. Right or wrong, we share see as right or wrong will be based on the outcome over the next 5 years. Of course, the time line is in big question too. I am sure the OTL investors never thought they'd be sitting here 15 years later at a $1 and change and missed out on investment gains for the past 15+ years with NAVB investment.
It continues to be interesting with lots of mis-steps/mistakes, yet, we/NAVB are/is still in the game and surviving. It seems it will be getting much more interesting in the coming months. Let's see what happens and if this shows any signs to be as big as we hope it to be... LS or especially MT and lets hope it shows signs it will allow more patience with some PPS increase and signs it will likely continue. It's been tough due to the years and years of no movement except down yet investors hanging in there. It will be easier to be patient and to hang in there if we see things that are good with some PPS growth and increase. They may be coming in the near term months. I imagine over the next 12 to 24 months if we don't see some big things, many investors will sell and move on. Maybe WS is or continues to manipulate this just for that reason, who knows. Time will tell the truth for sure. GL
Money provides good info and discussion. He does get a little far out there at times and gets carried away and his post lose value and are off the mark periodically. But still some good info and insight, IMO. I too breeze over a lot of his post due to what you are saying.
Agree, partnering is the way, IMO. It's good ironwill46 is not in-charge of NAVB and hopefully, not in-charge of much of anything, LOL. No way if this proves to be real, and that is key as it may not amount to anything as MOST do not, that selling out will bring the greatest reward to NAVB Stockholders. Partnering will bring much much more value to NAVB owners.
May have not been shared due many reasons; internal politics we've been hearing about recently, may just now be to a point to discuss and make public, may now be to a point that the big pharma is okay with it being public, may not be as big of a deal as we are concluding, etc. We'll see what they have to say on Monday. It best to be cautious IMO based on NAVB's history; past announcements having been disappointing and no big deal, poor execution, poor decisions, etc. The only thing that counts for NAVB for a good amount of time is good to great execution and good to great facts - nothing else will count for them with so many misses, IMO. The market knows best so if good things are coming or are really good, we'll see it in the PPS as it gets back to $3 to $5 range and then we can feel good and brag and crow about NAVB. Until then we need to keep quiet or be on the quiet side for sure!!!! All IMO
Poor dogface..... always #$%$ about something no matter if bad things or good things are occurring. You must be one miserable person all the time. LOL
Maybe, maybe not. I'd rather them cut his pay and no more stock grants as his contribution is not worth his pay (base nor stock). I am not sure we currently need a high paid CFO as small of a company as we are currently. Maybe some years down the road but now BL may be sufficient but cut his compensation dramatically, IMO. Just keep him out of any big decisions and keep his nose in the books and financial reporting.
He's forecasted it but has not hit it from a dose growth qtr over qtr. The dose price increases has allowed him to hit it but that is not the growth we need since it can be maintained. You can't keep raising the price to hit revenue growth. You have to grow the dose usage growth to meet sales revenue growth of 20% qtr over qtr growth and he's not accomplished that unless 3rd to 4th hit it, can't recall. But 1 time is not a trend nor is 2 times, 3+ is the being of a trend. So he's been a lot of BS on that forecast to-date.
Well you better mean 20% qtr over qtr because that is the only way to hit $22.5 million for NAVB sales ($45 million total) and they have to hit that with the current loan with CRG and they need to hit it to support the current PPS much less any chance to grow the PPS. So saying NO doesn't makes sense as the HAVE TO DO an average 20% Qtr over Qtr LS Sales growth.
I think you mean "continued US Growth in LS at 20% Qtr/Qtr. Qtr/Qtr being the change.
Not sure who the snakes are here, MG or RG. RG has not delivered anything close to the sales despite the added direct sales people. Hard to defend him with such poor results. He also dropped the ball on the sell of 4694. Hence, can't legitimately defend him with such poor outcomes and results if you are honest with yourself.
"Hopefully we'll turn the page to a new chapter soon... before we get to Chapter 11."