sorry, I just pressed "more" and saw the true wildness of your misplaced neuro-chemicals. Now your "defaming" me by linking me to msnbc? Wow, logic on acid, what's your trip like? Seems pretty angry, and certainly unfocused. You should've shut up when you appeared possibly sane
good luck, poor boy....
enough. I've wasted too much effort. And for what reason I do not know. Let the ether decide, if they want to bother.
Now the gloves are off. I've been way too polite and patient with the likes of you. You obviously have some very well-placed issues with your inferiority (it's not a "complex" if it's true).
And with more satisfaction that I wish to admit:
You are ignored, with extreme prejudice. Good luck in dealing with your pattiness and small-mindedness. You'll now be talking to the wind...
I did remove a post that was up for 15 seconds - for a grammatical error. I then did rewrite the whole as I didn't "copy" properly. If you did defend "nuke", I would be proper in asking you why but I don't remember you doing so. You did conflate in saying that b/c I called nuke a racist, I called you a racist.
So where was I dishonest?
If I wrote "why do you defend nuke?" then answer the question. EVERYONE who is unfortunate enough to bother with this, now inane, confrontation should want to know.
Now there's a reasonable post.
I rarely use the thumb but I'll applaud you with one now.
It would be nice to view Wiley's enthusiasm in a vacuum but for the danger that someone, perhaps less knowlegable, would take him seriously.
Even Buffett gets burned once in a while and no one should promote their observations as an absolute guarantee. (Sorry Wiley, I'm sure you're a wonderful human.)
I made the mistake once. Let me just say, that when a CEO answers a pertinent question on "the science" and you are the only two in the room, take the answer w/a grain of salt. A rookie mistake.
Wow, your wasting both of our time re-writing/interpreting history. What retraction?
And I haven't even used the words "venomous spew" or even "stupid" or "slimy" as you have for me. You improperly tried to say I called you a racist. "nukemullah" is a racist. See I don't have a problem using the word but it's not one I'd use, or have used, for you. Should I?
Your narrative serves your anger but not the truth.
"nukemullah" is a patently offensive, and racist screenname, he uses it unabashedly and therefore he IS a racist.
Calm down for a second and realize that I likened your alleged (though I did not level the allegation, it was a question, dipchit) posts to his negativity in a seperate post. You had to go to improper lengths to link the "racist" comment to you. Really far from clever, some would call it sad, not just unsubstanitive.
You having a bad day? It's not my fault.
I meant nothing but an observation. Are you saying you didn't start here posting negatives? If not, I must've mistaken you for someone with a VERY similar screen name as I certainly, at some point, took you off ignore - I will find out why.
I did say: "I want to confirm that" Sorry it twisted yer panties. Notice I didn't leap to any conclusions, and I also didn't resort to dickdom and call you slimy or stupid, you busted that maidenhead, and I'm removing my gloves in anticipation.
The character of my post HAVE changed - today. And I have questioned but not avered some of the recent action. I've also stated that, depending on the price EOD I will, or will not sell.
So much for reasonable give and take, I'll never get ovcer the fact that anything remotely negative stirs such ire. It really cuts down on the potential usefulness of these boards. Since we're all dealing with potential outcomes, i don't think anyone can argue vs a potentially negative one - even w/ NVAX
Have a nice day
sk, I remembered when you first showed up here, you were more of the "nukemullah" persuasion. I wanted to confirm that ,as you've been the most acerbic in your criticism of my brilliantly sage posts today (it's just a joke) but alas, your history seems to be washed past june. Now who woulda done that to you?
AAAAAH, finally, one positive development in this dark cave. Nuke-the-racist rears his ghastly, empty, reverse indicator head.
I'm so relieved!
I've swum across the NVAX river a few hundered bags worth over the last ten years.
These boards have one glaring shortcoming, there is no room for reasonable, if negative, speculation. I expect a raft of these comments, and I'll gladly eat crow - or lend you a raft. My ship has already come in here. I've sweated very little blood in that 10 years - until the last month or so. I've HAVE seen this before, I DO believe in the platform, I DO think NVAX, will see over $50/share(if not bought first). Maybe there is a less than even chance that something is not amiss, and if not, there will be a chance to be there for a reward - it's a huge pipeline.
Day trader? Now that's an insult
I'm still in the "transitional - technology" camp but that doesn't preclude any hiccups along the way. I don't have Buffett's juice to sit tight through the good and the bad (he's taking a hit on his vast rail interests, now that oil is cheap and coal keeps fading). He can afford to wait years, most can't.