Looka here dorky boy - BUYAMD - no more need be said.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
TIME TO GO ALL IN
Sentiment: Strong Buy
You show that you can make a new alias and pump gold at the same time. You're so talented!
caseyboy416 lacks credibility
caseyboy416 posted today, "DRYS... Was a fraud 6 years ago and still is today." So, the word fraud, defined.
Fraud, the crime of using dishonest methods to take something valuable from another person. Source: Merriam-Webster Dictionary. And what caseyboy416 maintains is that DRYS for 6 entire years has fraudulently taken money by criminal means. Well, now let's review history in it's relevant context. December 31, 2012 and this available from sec.gov website. Cut & paste On March 5, 2009, a complaint against certain of the Company's current and former directors was filed in the High Court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, captioned Rosenquist v. Economou, et al. (Case No. 2009-056). The Rosenquist complaint, which was amended on August 14, 2009, sought an unspecified amount of damages and alleged that the defendants had breached certain fiduciary duties owed to the Company in connection with the termination of the acquisition of four Panamax drybulk carriers and nine Capesize drybulk carriers. The complaint also sought the disgorgement of all payments made in connection with the termination of these acquisitions. The High Court dismissed the case in February 2010. The plaintiff appealed and on October 5, 2011 the Supreme Court affirmed dismissal. On December 7, 2011, the plaintiff sent a letter requesting the Company's board to take certain action with respect to the allegations in his former complaint. On January 5, 2012, the board established a Special Committee consisting of five disinterested directors to investigate the plaintiff's request. The relevant investigation has been completed and the Special Committee unanimously recommended to the Company's board of directors that the plaintiff's demand letter be rejected. Following the Special Committee's recommendation, the board of directors authorized the Special Committee to respond to the plaintiff that the relevant demand has been rejected.