Yes...Listed by Adam F this morning as the third worst performing bio of the last quarter...Down -47%.
My other large holding TGTX was listed at number four down -42% for the quarter. Boy can I pick them.
If only I had gone short!!
Thanks AK,,,Looked at CARA and too early for me. I don't do well usually in previously busted IPO's plus one indication for now at least...In fact right now not doing real well in anything bio!
Problem is there are alot of trials under way for TGTX but we need to see some very positive results.
Yes...the lead in safety data is excellent...no doubt about that. But....what about efficacy as a stand alone
CLL drug? That is the homerun potential. Can we get near PCYC's Ibrut at a 90% ORR? What about PFS? Are we in the same ballpark as a mono therapy as the big boys? Guess only time will tell huh?
Sentiment: Strong Buy
I'll meet your 6500 in the 24's and 25's and raise you another 14760 in the low 24's....
Do you call???
This current management group is a classic. Classic idiots. Not only did they do the stock buyout that you spoke of, then managed to cut the dividend after failing to cut expenses like 99% of the MLP's did did.
Strong hedges in place through 2017 but dubious properties after that to support the stock...a dividend or
even longer term continued operations. Unless oil is $75 or above by 01/02/18 this name is hasta la vista and the market price is telling you the exact same thing.
Man you are good!!! That bottom you called at $32 on Sept 25th when you claim you added 9k shares?
Looking at your posts all the way down from 40 you must own a million shares by now...lol....
You are the classic example of a broken clock is right twice per day! LOL
Best post in six months on this Board. Objective...educated....precise. Now we're talking here rather than the minute by minute fluff posts and cheerleading. Read this one a couple of times.....
And AK I've borrowed one from your quiver as well... There has been no selling since June (small and pre planned I believe) by any Officer of CEMP which is in sharp contrast to what was going on at TTPH...
Bodes well for results IMHO...Good or bad news always seems to leak to someone...
...And with that said...I've already posted here numerous times my "belief" that the Phase 3 IV trial will probably be successful. Just not willing to gamble 60% down on that belief.
Oh come on kiddo...Don't pull that spelling stuff out of your lil (abbreviation for "little") bag of arrows....
If you want to align yourself with posters who say they already know the Phase III trial results ("everyone
already knows they are positive") or posters who say mgs (abbreviation for milligrams) doesn't matter in
the administration of an antibiotic, so be it.
You and others here have already taken a whole group of "believers" down the drain from the mid 40's to the mid 20's by defending every word that has been said here and was positive on Soli or CEMP. Objectivity might be a nice change.
Oh Harry...Wake up from your coma man...Do you teach junior high school chemistry or what? The mg's adminstered definitely matters all things being equal in the basic chemistry of the underlying drug. Do you think the administration of 2mg of Soli is a strong or potentially as effective at 8mg of Soli? Why do you think they make drugs in different mgs.dumb dumb? Why do you think prescriptions specify the mgs to be administered and over what time period? Perhaps one of the dumbest statements I've ever read on a
So rosettawest...You know more than Praha does about how the statistical analysis is going so that's great.
Did you gleen this knowledge from staying at a Holiday Inn Express last night, or did it come to you in an out of body experience? Just wondering your source of "everybody knows it" (the success of the IV trial). You're totally clueless as is everyone else here, and when you can admit that, you'll be on your road to recovery.
Until then, get a Conservator over your assets....
Problem here and on some other Boards as well.... You get these guru type posters who try and convince others that they know something, and they know crapola. Probably retired insurance salesman. When Praha
is basically clueless as to the results, why would anyoe here think THEY know something?
What we do know is that the IV trial was powered to succeed. I mean 7 days of max Soli IV then 800mg oral
doses after that? If that doesn't do it then nothing will frankly. So at least the trial is power upped. The group is good too...Port 3 mostly middle aged males...? Nothing more you can ask for really.
But if the trial fails let's not delude ourselves here. The company and the stock are toast. The oral Soli success in the face of a failed IV trial designed for success will look like a fluke. Ghono? Who will really care
after that? Pediatrics...ditto...Not going to give a failed drug to a child or infant are you with their life on the line? COPD...ditto. Who cares at that point?
No, CEMP will pull a TTPH and likely go down into mid single digits....Best case scenario frankly.
So everyone here get out your rosary beads out and start praying cause it is a make or break situation IMHO.
No....I didn't mean to say Ghono will be a failure. I think what she meant was by nature of the disease there will be some that Soli will not cure. And, do to the fact that the trials are in Australia Cemp might have less hands on day to day control of the trials and the participants and their habits and regimens etc. so kind of less visibility to some extent.
I just listened to her presentation and suggest everyone else does as well and form your own conclusions.
But...To me she seemed very excited with how the trial was designed...The major population being Port 3 males...middle aged...the same number of days (7) of IVs as Moxi for this trial...And the switch to oral Soli
is NOT a step down, but at 800mg, a very potent dose my friends...I think the trials will be a success quite frankly...
She quite frankly sounded less uncertain about Ghono as "there will be some failures" and it's in Australia.
IMHO...do your own DD and good luck..........
Darn it I will not concede I am smarter than you, nor do I belive that AK!!!!
You're the one holding ZSPH from $40 to now $62....( plus selling 20% above $80)..
I'm the one that is holding RLYP from the mid 18's to $17.50 but also all the way down from $42
...LOL...Now who's smarter!!
What it most likely meant is that the IV patients as a group did slightly better than the oral patients as a group.
That meant the IV /step down to oral was probably a more effective treatment regimen then simply oral, as the group was likely sicker than the oral group as a whole.
What it doesn't tell you is the crux of the trial...Which patients did better...Soli or Moxi? Which group had less side effects...Soli or Moxi. And lastly...by how much?
Given Prabha's comments re the very close results between oral and IV, the results should be very close.
I'm thinking a slight advantage to one or the other but not enough for one to be statistically superior.
You are such a dip sheet trading pro moron...Seriously. The only thing that has probably hit bottom today is the value of your account. You couldn't trade your way out of a paper bag. All you have done here is tell people to "buy,,,buy,,,,buy" CEMP, and if anyone followed your advice they'd be wiped out by now. Give it a rest. Haven't you done enough harm to the novice investor?