Hudget pumps HLF when he's long and bashes it when he's short. Funny sales weren't a concern for him when he was long, only the fact that he claimed they were undervalued. They were undervalued last year in the $40 but now he bashes the stock. HYPOCRITE
I leave for a couple hours and the BIG MOUTH goes bananas. He seemed a little unhinged this morning.
The only thing that has changed since $73 is that Assskman has stepped up his attacks. Interesting that he dropped the pyramid talking point and has now gone after people on a personal level. First he capitulates on 40% of his end of the earth short, now he can't make up his mind what is wrong. Worst trade ever...DOWN 49% LOL
Keep an eye on your account as the margin boys will come calling when you wake up to Stiritz's $90 take out bid. LOL
This poster is singhlion.....He keeps getting thrown off the board and keeps coming back with new ID's. He lives in a cave.
Icahn already told you what he is going to do....he didn't sell at $73 when he could and at the time still called HLF undervalued. You lose basher. You people can keep trying to make that point like you did endlessly as we approached $73, you were wrong then and even more wrong now. Your boy assskman going to feel more pain.
and their stock was UP 30% because they were being bought out. It's a painful lesson to learn if you are short and the stock is halted and you have NO OUT. The stock moves against you $20 - $25 in a heartbeat. I don't wish anyone to lose that much money, but if you don't think that is being discussed at the round table than you are a fool.
What are all the small fry shorts going to do? Multiply the number of shares you are short by $20 and that is what you will lose. Are you ready for this if it comes at any day? Just saying. Stiritz has already said he is game for this scenario.
Bloomberg: Herbalife Ripens for Suitors Dismissing Ackman.
David Volpe, fund manager for 3 billion dollar Emerald Asset Management said, " I had questions about certain elements of their sales practices, but it feels to me like they’ve addressed a lot of them,” " Given the controversy surrounding the business model, it might make sense for them to be a private company.”
You guys are getting desperate aren't you? Are these states going to look into questionable SEC violations by PS and Ackman?
AGAIN, tex, it is NOT about what the exact number of the float is, YOU nor I know what that is exactly right now, the gist of the post was about volatility. You can continue to rant because it seems that is all you have.
I corrected that tex and I even gave you the website that I got it from. You should lay off the caffeine.
3 different sources give 3 different numbers. Finviz financial which I looked at this morning gives 102m outstanding and 92 float, HLF website gives 101m outstanding and 70m float, yahoo gives something different. I don't think anyone has the correct updated outstanding and float since the debt deal but we can let Texexec go on his tirade if it makes him feel better.
As usual he missed the point of the post which was the effect it has on volatility. Seems the boy has come unhinged this morning. Maybe he is behind on child support again, I don't know.
You posted the float was 64m, You were WRONG. Glass houses, Rocks, you get the picture tex. Take a pill and calm down.
NO MORON, you attacked me saying I didn't know the difference. I admitted I posted the wrong number, I got it directly from a website. Are you DENSE? The point of the post was that the float was going down, which is CORRECT, and the relation that has on trading. You are so caught up in trying to find a little mistake you simply missed the point. Typical for you.