Critiquing Herbalife's response as opposed to it's content. The true sign of an ignorant juvenile. Looks like he is another CLOWN in the circus. LMAO
This Matt guy is a total douchebag. HLF makes a fool out of him.
1) The recent $HLF article on @Seeking Alpha by Matt Stewart is anything but a smoking gun. (1 of 4)
2) This report has been out in the public for several months & no publication reported any “smoking gun,” as there is no story. $HLF (2 of 4)
3) The results are exactly as we expected, as they reflect a survey of 46 Sales Leaders. $HLF (3 of 4)
4) The 46 Sales Leaders reflect a small sub-set of our millions of members who likely joined $HLF for the business opportunity. (4 of 4)
This IDIOT Stewart has no clue what he is doing. Calls it a leaked internal document. He posts all this trying to make a splash like he has something. He has nothing and in the meantime makes a total FOOL out of himself. He must be one of the lead CLOWNS in the Circus.
How do I answer an ignorant question? I don't. Ask it correctly and I will in an unbiased view, answer it.
Is it possible that revenue was high enough to offset the strong dollar. One report in December said orders were strong and some products were getting hard to get.
Hey tex, how many times during the 19 straight quarters that HLF Beat earnings did they come out and warn investors they would BEAT?
Why do you continue to act like a moron with zero understanding of the markets? You appear dumb as a rock.
Sure he does sl1, he quoted all the numbers given by Barclays and used them as his talking points. Are you saying he CHERRY PICKED his information to suit his agenda? Is that what you're saying? Surely texexec wouldn't cherry pick his facts.
Tex is using Barclays research report and their earnings number. They said $64, thanks tex. Need to load the boat.
My mistake tex, it was by the other LIAR, Matt Stewart. I don't read that garbage was going off twitter. I stand corrected. Learn the difference between a lie and a mistake.
Thanks texexec, you're the best. Thinking about buying more based on your recommendation.
I figure it must be true since he is quoting Barclays research report.
texexec thinks we are going to $64, quotes Barclays numbers so one must assume he is going to quote the price target she gave.
Oh wait, is that LIAR texexec going to cherry pick his facts and NOT post everything. Not surprised.