Sun, Sep 21, 2014, 2:58 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. Message Board

foxhsmart 14 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 27, 2014 10:15 AM Member since: Oct 11, 2005
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    ACAS as a Buyout Candidate

    by spokanimalbj Aug 25, 2014 1:49 PM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 27, 2014 10:15 AM Flag

    NMB,
    I observed the method needed to preserve NOL's in a prior situation. It has to do with how the change of control is structured but it is quite doable.
    Fox

  • Reply to

    Dilution question

    by foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 25, 2014 10:46 AM Flag

    rc5717,

    Which are the two internally managed BDC's you prefer? I'll take a look at them.

    Fox

  • Reply to

    Dilution question

    by foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 23, 2014 10:16 AM Flag

    Excellent reply. I saw the situation with an externally managed REIT blow up in shareholders faces previously. There is too much of a carrot for the external managers to fulfill their fiduciary duty to shareholders and they opt to fill their own pockets.

    Fox

  • Reply to

    Question about investment...

    by thewinerack Aug 18, 2014 11:53 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 1:13 PM Flag

    NMB/Blankwillie,

    It seems, of course, as always--that we must simply TRUST ACSF/ACAS to be good guardians of our shareholder value. Perhaps FSC/FSFR have a bit of a shady history and track record in that regard that both ACSF and ACAS have no intention of duplicating???

    Here is an incisive post about FSFR/FSC:

    "Shares may trade higher due to FSFR's higher than average dividend yield for a senior floating rate BDC, but when next quarters results are official, and investors realize they won't be earning that dividend, reality will sink in and this thing will be priced along with other BDC's that aren't earning their dividend.

    I don't think it's just a coincidence that FSC & FSFR both raised their dividend beyond what their portfolios are earning in an attempt to make their secondaries more attractive to investors.

    The Fifth Street franchise has proven to be a wealth destroyer for shareholders, although it's a real money maker for the external manager.

    FSC IPO'd in June 2008 $ $14.12. NAV was $13.02 at IPO.

    Today FSC's share price trades 31% lower than the IPO price and NAV is 25% less.

    FSFR IPO'd a mere 13 months ago at $15.00 and already is trading 17% lower than it's IPO price, and now with this highly dilutive secondary, has managed to destroy NAV per share by over 15%.

    With so many BDC's where management operates in their shareholders best interest, I don't see any reason to consider the Fifth Street BDC's."

  • Reply to

    Question about investment...

    by thewinerack Aug 18, 2014 11:53 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 12:59 PM Flag

    NMB/Blankwillie,
    After Blank's post I looked at the FSFR situation. It's interesting that they indicate that they had the support of ISS (?) the shareholder advocacy group that opines on proxy vote issues and one other group for their pending massive share offering at FSFR. I did not read deeply enough to understand why FSFR felt they needed to do such a big, dilutive offering. The bit I read said they were to use proceeds to repay debt and use for corporate purposes and to make some further investments. Nothing seemed too urgent, NMB, It does cause on to worry that ASCF might like to do the same thing at some point in the future. It is in FSFR's best interest to increase AUM to earn a higher management fee, and shareholders must be concerned about dilution. ACSF has the same interest at heart. One wonders how FSFR got the approval of existing shareholder to do the share offering. ACSF share owners would have a say on such matters, and one would think they would certainly vote down such a proposal. From ACAS's standpoint, increased AUM at ACSF would bring in more $, so it is not as if ACSF is free from influence from ACAS either.

    Fox

  • Reply to

    Question about investment...

    by thewinerack Aug 18, 2014 11:53 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 10:50 AM Flag

    Blankwillie,

    What rationale did management give for its need to dilute previous shareholders with the share offering at FSFR?

  • foxhsmart by foxhsmart Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM Flag

    What as the rationale management gave for its need to do the share offering which diluted previous shareholders?

  • Reply to

    Taxes

    by hottubber99 Aug 11, 2014 2:04 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 11, 2014 2:19 PM Flag

    jim_hairball,

    I looked on the KMP and the KMI websites for the information/presentation you posted and I do not see it. Can you point me specifically to where this is on the KMP or KMI website?

    Thanks

  • Reply to

    Taxes

    by hottubber99 Aug 11, 2014 2:04 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 11, 2014 1:51 PM Flag

    One would think that as long as current KMP unitholders convert to shares of KMI and ALSO opt to take the $10.77 in KMI stock and NOT cash that any taxes due would be deferred as it is in almost all other stock based mergers/acquisitions. Why is this transaction different?

    Regardless of the fact that the new KMI will not be an MLP, the historical benefit already accrued to existing KMP holders one would think would be preserved, HOWEVER, not in regard to dividends paid going forward once the new KMI is consummated. In other words, your new costs basis in KMI would reflect your old cost basis in KMP which you have been adjusting downward to reflect the non taxable portion of the MLP distributions you have received. And that old cost basis remains in place until such time as you sell you KMI shares (or pass them through to your relatives at a stepped up cost basis once you die) with the exception that your dividends received after the new KMI has absorbed all of the other entities will be treated regular taxable dividends and will no longer be non taxable and treated as a reduction to your cost basis.

    This makes a lot of sense to me. Any rebuttals out there?

  • Reply to

    ACAS Future

    by zeit0001 Aug 7, 2014 11:45 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Aug 7, 2014 11:36 PM Flag

    NMB,
    What is the typical percentage discount to NAV that ACAS's peers are now selling at in the market?
    Fox

  • very nice .83 cent increase in NAV from the 1st quarter of 2014. It has been the steady increase in NAV for the past 5 years which has lifted the stock. Perhaps tomorrow will see the market appreciate this .83 cent increase in NAV?
    Further, this is the MOST EXPLICIT I have ever seen CEO Malon Wilkus ever be in discussing the reorg plan. He explicitly states that ACAS is expecting to present the reorg plan to the Board of Directors in the 4th quarter of this year. That paragraph from Wilkus, along with the sure-to-come follow on analyst questions in tomorrow's earnings conference call about the reorg (now that Wilkus has set a 4th quarter expectation for it) may bring some increased interest in ACAS stock as well.
    That said, the share price has been languishing lately and the market could just yawn as it has recently over the possibility of the reorg. Seems to me that the reorg is coming into focus much more clearly now that Malon has been so explicit about it in this quarterly earnings release, though.
    As always, time will tell!

    Fox

  • Reply to

    Calls vs Outright

    by mtncareer Jul 25, 2014 11:22 AM
    foxhsmart foxhsmart Jul 25, 2014 1:20 PM Flag

    mtncareer,

    Yes the value of your options would reflect the potentially increased value of the ACAS underlying in a Spinco situation. Your option holdings would change do to the spin, but the value will remain and reflect the higher value of the combined ACAS/Spinco should the market deem the reorg action as value enhancing.

    Hope that help you.

    Fox

  • foxhsmart foxhsmart Jul 23, 2014 1:05 PM Flag

    NMB,
    Was any part of you buying the options due to a belief that the coming ACAS earnings release will see ACAS surprise on earnings to the upside?
    Also wondering whether you bought the additional options because you think there is a good chance ACAS will further and meaningfully delineate their reorg plan with the coming earnings release conference call.
    Just wondering and pondering!
    Fox

  • foxhsmart foxhsmart Jul 3, 2014 1:55 PM Flag

    I'm surprised, too. Great news on the dividend has yet to be reflected in a higher stock price. It may yet come, though. Time will tell.

    Fox

EPD
41.10+0.55(+1.36%)Sep 19 4:06 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.