Sat, Nov 22, 2014, 9:44 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Inergy, L.P. Message Board

fred357mag2000 2979 posts  |  Last Activity: 40 minutes ago Member since: Apr 4, 2011
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 40 minutes ago Flag

    "Youassholes have a nice little political circle jerk going here with nothing whatever to do with NTI. Go out and get jobs, losers". This post ring a bell with you cumbraggio?

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 11 hours ago Flag

    The FBI arrested two men Thursday night accused of purchasing explosives they apparently planned to use during protests in Ferguson, Missouri, a law enforcement source told CBS News.

    The men, who live in the St. Louis area, are allegedly members of the new Black Panthers. They were arrested as part of an FBI undercover operation near Ferguson and intended to use the explosives in pipe bombs, the source confirmed.

    The suspects, whose names were not released, were arraigned in federal court on Friday.

    FBI spokeswoman Rebecca Wu told CBS News the suspects were arrested on outstanding warrants.

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 12 hours ago Flag

    CLAYTON • State and local officials on Friday announced that while they have not negotiated with a coalition of protest groups, they did agree on some of the 19 proposed "rules of engagement" in advance of the announcement of a grand jury decision in the Ferguson shooting of Michael Brown.

    A coalition of roughly 50 groups asked officials earlier this month to agree to 19 rules of engagement for the police response to protests. The first was that “The first priority shall be the preservation of human life.” The groups asked police to agree to a “de-militarized response” that would ban the use of armored vehicles, rubber bullets, rifles and tear gas.

    The groups also requested police respect safe spaces set up in houses of worship, and for advance notice of the decision of the grand jury considering whether to charge Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson for the Aug. 9 fatal shooting of Brown, 18.

    The unified police command, which includes the Missouri Highway Patrol and St. Louis County and St. Louis city police, said they agree on some of the group's proposed rules, such as the first priority being the preservation of human life. They also agreed to a series of measures intended to facilitate communication, encourage professionalism by police, discourage aggressive acts and allow those not involved in protests to go about their lives.

    They declined, however, to commit to rules about arrests, court procedures and the use of crowd control measures such as armored vehicles and tear gas, qualifying their responses.

  • Reply to

    The Red Thumbs of Left

    by chairmanbarack 20 hours ago
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 15 hours ago Flag

    Red thumbs are meaningless when you post the truth! All it does is show such posters are either ignorant or devoid of any reading skills for meaning, or both. They are small people who think such things are important.

  • Reply to

    Impeach Obama

    by purely_evil Nov 20, 2014 10:28 PM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 16 hours ago Flag

    Well your wrong on that. I don't follow lock step with the party I vote for. I don't like McCain, and always felt Romney was real nice guy, but too weak to run for President. All this don't matter, nothings going to change your mind about anything. I won't even waste my time trying, but when your obviously lying, please excuse me when I call you up. What's so grating about you liberals is you all think other people are so stupid to believe you.

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 18 hours ago Flag

    Attorney General Eric Holder privately expressed frustration to Missouri's governor over declaring a state of emergency ahead of a grand jury decision in last summer's police shooting of an unarmed black man in Ferguson, a Justice Department official told CBS news.

    Missouri governor declares state of emergency in Ferguson
    The official said Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon didn't give the department advance notice of the state of emergency and activation of the National Guard, CBS News reporter Paula Reid reports. Nixon took the actions Monday while a grand jury is deciding whether to indict Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who is white, for the fatal shooting of Michael Brown.

    A decision from the grand jury is expected in the coming days.

    Holder thought that Nixon's actions set the wrong tone and that the tone of his press conference Monday was counter-productive and served to escalate tensions well ahead of the grand jury decision, the official said.

    Protesters arrested in clash outside Ferguson police station
    Two sources have confirmed to Reid that the grand jury was expected to hear from one more witness Friday and then begin deliberations.

    Looks like Eric Holder is also deaf and blind as what's happening every night in Ferguson & area. It's not setting the wrong tone, it's called being prepared for the worst.

  • Reply to

    Impeach Obama

    by purely_evil Nov 20, 2014 10:28 PM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 19 hours ago Flag

    crymore, Obama has had zero to do with the economy, nada, zip, nothing!! The Federal Reserve with zero money, printing presses running 28 hours a day is what's holding this together. Just wait until the day the Fed just raises rates .25% and panic be in the streets. Any economist will tell you this if you were not tone deaf. Even at that, this has been the longest, slowest recovery since the depression. Clearly you don't watch Fox either, as if you did, you would know your lying. Wake up, Obama and his party of clowns tearing this country down, apart. Don't you ever read polls? People are waking up to this nightmare they voted in just because he was a 50% and looked black. Grossly unqualified to be president and everyday he proves it.

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 23 hours ago Flag

    Last Updated Nov 21, 2014 8:02 AM EST

    Police and protesters clashed outside Ferguson, Missouri police headquarters Thursday night.

    Protesters lined up and chanted, taunting 31 officers, mostly from St. Louis County, for about an hour, as the officers secured the perimeter of the police station.

    But, according to a CBS News producer on-scene, demonstrators then moved into the street and blocked a handful of cars. That's when things turned ugly.

    Police charged at protesters, trying to move them back toward a nearby parking lot. They then charged at protesters with pepper spray, batons, bean bag rifles and shields.

    Several protesters were thrown to the ground, and at least three were arrested.

    Witnesses say at least one man was shot with a bean bag gun and ran off.

    A number of liberal leaning networks keep reporting the on going demonstration have been 'for the most part' peaceful. However this rarely the case with continued taunting directed at officer, bottles etc being tossed. Bottom line, the so called protesters are gearing up to cause as much damage as they can.

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 21, 2014 8:27 AM Flag

    FERGUSON, MO (KTVI)– Department of Justice representatives have come to Ferguson in the wake of Michael Brown’s death. They’re making strong demands they don’t appear to follow themselves.

    Activists often complain about officers without name tags. Department of Justice representative Christy Lopez jumped on the issue in a recent public meeting saying, “That’s a problem. We need to fix that.” A police wife told us that officers agree they should not be anonymous, but said they`ve lately faced extreme circumstances that have caused some to remove their name tags at times.

    The police wife said officers have been, “screamed at by protestors, “we`re going to go to your house. We`re going to rape your wives then we`re going to kill them and we`re going to kill your children” and this is being screamed at them in the presence of Department of Justice agents.”

    Those agents said a name tag is non-negotiable, regardless of the threat.

    At a public meeting Christy Lopez said, “Especially when it`s tense.”

    The police wife said DOJ agents are “not there to guide, they`re there to harm.”

    She says a DOJ rep. criticized an officer who said he was afraid for his family. The police wife explained, “The person was told, by the Department of Justice agent, if they`re afraid of the citizens of Ferguson, they shouldn`t be police.”

    Yet Federal Agents appeared to be afraid when they called Ferguson police for help. An incident report, obtained by Fox 2, reveals a series of tense moments on September 25th. DOJ was meeting inside a business when a 911 call revealed subjects “stopping at (that business).” Then another 911 call describes “DOJ inside coffee house, requesting escort out of building.” Fox4

  • Reply to

    Impeach Obama

    by purely_evil Nov 20, 2014 10:28 PM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 21, 2014 7:46 AM Flag

    For a president to toss aside such deep traditions of governance is a radical, imprudent step. When a president in day-to-day operations can decide which laws to enforce and which to ignore, where are the limits on his power? Where are the checks and balances so carefully constructed in the Constitution?
    If a Democratic president can cancel existing laws on immigration, what is to prevent the next Republican from unilaterally canceling laws on health care?
    A bad way to start with new Congress
    Coming on the heels of midterm elections that were a clear call for a change of course in Washington, starting in the White House, this is also a discouraging way to open the final years of this presidency. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC poll finds that by 53-40%, Americans feel positive about the election results; by 56-33%, they want Congress to set policy for the country, not the President; by 57-40% they favor a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants but by 42-32%, they disapprove of Obama overhauling immigration through executive order. Why isn't the White House listening to the public?
    In retrospect, it would have been far better if coming out of the elections, the President had said he had promised he would act through executive order before the end of the year, but in light of the election results, he would work with the new Congress for six months. If there were no legislation, he would act on his own.
    That would have been a much fairer proposition, would have started out with Republicans on better footing, and would have rallied the public behind him if the GOP refused to cooperate.
    Sadly, we instead have an action from the White House that will cast a dark shadow over prospects for legislative cooperation, falls short of what the immigrant population had hoped and steers us into deep, unknown waters in our governance.

  • Reply to

    Impeach Obama

    by purely_evil Nov 20, 2014 10:28 PM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 21, 2014 7:45 AM Flag

    The White House has repeatedly pointed to immigration-related executive orders issued by past presidents, notably Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, to support the legality of President Obama's order and to palliate its partisan sting.
    Both the executive orders cited, however, can be distinguished from the case at hand. Reagan granted amnesty to 100,000 undocumented immigrants to close a loophole in the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed in 1986.
    Bush's order, which granted amnesty to at most 1.5 million people (although the actual number who benefited is likely much smaller), also attempted to clean up a piece of legislation. As Mark Krikorian writes in National Review, the Reagan and Bush examples were presidents trying to implement congressional directives, as is constitutionally permissible, whereas the current action is the President telling Congress "I'm going to implement my own directives."
    While the President's impatience is understandable and his anger at Republican intransigence is well placed, that does not justify an abandonment of traditional ways of addressing hard public problems.
    Against the spirit of the Constitution
    One can argue whether this executive order is legal, but it certainly violates the spirit of the founders. They intentionally focused Article One of the Constitution on the Congress and Article Two on the president. That is because the Congress is the body charged with passing laws and the president is the person charged with faithfully carrying them out.
    In effect, the Congress was originally seen as the pre-eminent branch and the president more of a clerk. CNN

  • Reply to

    RIG & SDRL Trade

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 13, 2014 9:43 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 4:17 PM Flag

    You see the game on ALDW today? Got in $17 after it made a low after checking if any news. Just hedges & traders playing games.

  • Reply to

    What's Obama Letting In?

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 9:27 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 3:36 PM Flag

    Been trying to post 'Ferguson protester's rules of engagement' and can't even get that done.

  • Reply to

    What's Obama Letting In?

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 9:27 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 1:58 PM Flag

    Can anyone come up with a better name than 'Homeland Security'? Somehow it no longer seems to have any meaning as 'Security'. I am not sure any department under this administration has any meaning as to what they were legally designed do. Seems in six years they all have morphed into something else.

  • Reply to

    RIG & SDRL Trade

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 13, 2014 9:43 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 11:52 AM Flag

    Started adding a long position on CVRR today, 23.67 1k. The four I watch the most, CLMT, NTI, CVRR & ALDW don't look like they primed for a big sell off. ALDW might be the exception but will buy it $17 even & under. Will also buy NTI if it can get under $24. Seems weak spot oil has done about all the damage it can to those stocks. I had hope for a bigger sell off after EX and might still get one but odds against. With EX 2/06/15, and if we get the January effect we should get a good pop. Not easy to make money in this sector as it is to lose money.

  • fred357mag2000 by fred357mag2000 Nov 20, 2014 9:27 AM Flag

    (Reuters) - The Department of Homeland Security will grant temporary protected status to people from the three West African countries most affected by Ebola who are currently residing in the United States, department officials said on Thursday.

    People from Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in the United States as of Thursday may apply for protection from deportation, as well as for work permits, for 18 months, said a Department of Homeland Security official.

    After 18 months, the Secretary of Homeland Security will assess whether the protection should be extended, based on the level of the Ebola epidemic in West Africa.

    The move is a response to the Ebola epidemic, which has claimed more than 5,000 lives, mostly in the three West African countries. Reuters

  • Reply to

    My Crack Spread Is What!!!!

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 19, 2014 1:48 PM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 19, 2014 4:52 PM Flag

    " too risky". I hear that!! Not easy making money in this beat down sector when your fight the tape. Everything look so cheap when you compare them to just six months ago, but problem we find ourselves in is it keeps getting cheaper. You buy a bargain and month later look like a fool. I keep going back five years on charts trying to get an idea of bottoms. A big concern here is the oil sector starts cutting back on distribution! Only good thing is we don't have to be concerned about SPO's. LOL

  • Reply to

    Party Time Coming...

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 18, 2014 11:55 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 19, 2014 2:13 PM Flag

    Eric Holder, who dropped the New Black Panther case and almost had a defender of cop-killer Mumia abu-Jamal as an assistant, takes the death penalty off the table for four alleged Virginia cop-killers.
    When cops are the victims instead of the accused, a different standard of social justice seems to apply.
    Waynesboro, Va., is not Ferguson, Mo., and 45-year-old reserve Virginia police officer Kevin Quick is not Michael Brown, shot and killed by Ferguson officer Darren Wilson.
    In February, officer Quick never made it after he texted his girlfriend that he was on his way to see her.
    According to police, Quick was set upon by three siblings and a fourth man, and was carjacked, kidnapped and taken from bank to bank to withdraw money using his own debit card at gunpoint before being shot to death.
    His body was found in a wooded area in Goochland County six days later.
    Siblings Daniel Mathis, Shantai Shelton and Mersadies Shelton have been charged along with a fourth man, Kweli Uhuru, in a federal indictment that lists them as members of a street gang called the "99 Goon Syndicate," an offshoot of the infamous "Bloods" gang, and allegedly committed the murder to climb in the gang ranks.
    The alleged killers now await trial, which is currently set for May 4, 2015.
    Federal prosecutors say that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has taken the death penalty off the table in this case and that the four co-defendants will instead face the possibility of life without parole.
    No official reason has been given in this case of premeditated murder. But we suspect the reasons include Holder's opposition to the death penalty and his sharing of the belief that the death penalty in particular and the justice system in general are skewed against minority defendants such as these four accused. (If white then what)?
    Read More At Investor's Business Daily

  • fred357mag2000 by fred357mag2000 Nov 19, 2014 1:48 PM Flag

    LONDON (Reuters) - Brent crude oil slipped towards $78 a barrel on Wednesday as data showed Saudi Arabia increased crude exports in September despite signs of an oversupplied market and producers appeared divided ahead of an OPEC meeting to discuss output.

    All eyes are on OPEC's response to a drop in oil prices of nearly one-third in recent months, with some smaller members calling for production cuts at the Nov. 27 meeting in Vienna.

    OPEC heavyweight Saudi Arabia has so far shown no indication that it will support a reduction in OPEC production.

    Diplomatic and market sources say Saudi officials said in recent private briefings that the kingdom could live for some time with current, or even lower, price levels.

    Even seasoned OPEC veterans say they do not know how the cartel will respond to the collapse in oil prices this year.

    "For the first time, I really do not know what is likely to happen at the meeting. It is not clear," one long-serving senior OPEC delegate told Reuters.

    Brent was down 10 cents at $78.37 a barrel at 0815 GMT, after settling 84 cents lower in the previous session. Yahoo

  • Reply to

    RIG & SDRL Trade

    by fred357mag2000 Nov 13, 2014 9:43 AM
    fred357mag2000 fred357mag2000 Nov 19, 2014 12:15 PM Flag

    See what happens with OPEC as about all the negativity already been dumped. SDRL for now is a reasonable play for EX. I don't want to own it if breaks $20. NADL, that's another thing and looks like it might flat line in the $2-$3. See nothing to prop it up. Sometimes a sector will get so beat up you just have to buy into it. Yet, I continue to keep my powder dry for an over due correction. That's my big concern here, has been for couple years.

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.