I think this more than anything is driving the current run up in pps. This may turn out to surprise everyone and become a major catalyst for INTC. And, putting TV on the internet is going to drive server sales in a very very big way. I have a dream --- INTC at $400 in a decade.
Bring back the DEC Rainbow!
what else is new?
amen to that.
There is no doubt that INTC is gaining steam...big steam... my guess, it is for the wrong reasons because the market is a bunch of idiots...it's probably because Intel TV is getting so much more press, and not because of Haswell. .And of course, one of the biggest mouths of all chimes in to try to dent the explosive upsurge that this stock is about to experience...GS's Covello. Now, wrt Intel TV, there is of course a major background component to that and it could be humongous....it's the server demand that Intel TV will drive. In a dream last night after my seder meal, my head swirling with Mogen David, it came to me....INTC could get to $400/share in a decade. And, you know, my relatives at GS will be into it bigtime, as they use the kick blocker, Covello, to bridle the pps so they can lap up as much INTC as possible... they'll never let their munchkins get out in front of them !
Please tell me what law of physics is violated should INTC reduce its dividend? Conservation of energy? Electric charge?
Their big plans seem to target INTC markets. Is this an unspoken threat? I know you are wary of Samsung, but what about our national brethren, AAPL? I don't like Tim Cook...he look crazy silly.
Do you drive a car by looking out the rear view mirror? No wonder you're about to be truck flatted.
I hope they core out AAPL.
INTC could be flat to down divvy next 5 years.
I really doubt that you are any where near an income bracket that has to pay any federal taxes. You just aren't that bright.
Oh, sorry, I saw what looked like Wallis' format (putting comments in square brackets "[...]") and inadvertently said "thanks Wallis" when I now see that the message was from a different dude names bacbacker. My mistake.
Nice, Wallis.
Let's hope you're right. I personally wouldn't want to visit the downside of $17.
wondered why it smelled in here then I noticed your faint handle (which is on "ignore") leaching through onto my screen. I think your colostomy bag is leaking.
Where will you find such a crisp analysis as his "Intel at $48" SA article? Compare Covello who throws a few slogans into a file (eg "PC's are dead" "Missed Mobile" ) and comes up with garbage that gets national attention and drives the stock down, meanwhile collecting $500k (? probably more) per year. Ashraf puts out a reasoned and transparent analysis (you could easily translate this analysis into an xcel spreadsheet to play with his assumptions---in fact I'm doing it now), and he gets a conservative 4 year nominal pps that only the lunes drug addicts on Wall Street will ignore. Bravo Ashraf...you are the man!
I've generally found that two boots are better than one. Don't ever walk in the Penn Station men's room with fewer than two boots.
Do you think any reasonable man with self respect, dignity, and an ego could work with Cook or Ballmer? In any case, those two better realize who's wearing the pants, and soon...it ain't MSFT that's in charge anymore, and the clock is ticking for AAPL. So, why don't you just go take an aspirin, relax, and buy your daily 10,000 shares at the open?
MSFT should consider discontinuing RT and discontinuing CEO.
you are not only a psychopathic sociopathic pedophilic diseased subhuman, a victim of the ravages of your genes and your father's excesses, but you are also obsessed. You are hereby on perma-ignore (though I am thus far the only person who hasn't put you on ignore). In fact, I received an email from yahoo instructing me to put you and your other id's, att4glte, getanidxx, etc. on ignore. Good riddance!