Numbnuts, shorts are NOT winning any longer, you need to ask your boss if he's lost money in VHC. See, there's this little thingy known as "carry costs" in certain short positions for stocks. Some stocks are not real expensive, others are very expensive. In this case, it's VERY EXPENSIVE for your boss to be short VHC. Now, this concept is obviously above your GED education, but you only need ask him a simple question: "Hey, boss, will I still be employed now that you're losing money on the short position in VHC?" You won't like the answer. I hope you're getting your $.75 per post on some of his other holdings cause it ain't lookin' good for stoopid posting here much longer. Oh yeah, that's CHIEF Justice Roberts--not that you would understand what that means!! Pool boy wanted. Interested??
Uhhh, yeah Numbnuts has so many aliases even he can't remember what they are and how to post without someone figuring his foolishness out. Oh yeah, he's also Rogers and others. I laugh every time he answers himself on his posts with a good 'ol pat on the back for such a smart remark--hysterical!!
Dear phdhar, Uhhhh, how bout your own due diligence??? Read the transcripts from the Cuozzo arguments--pretty telling. Read the Apple questionnaire to jurors and make your own determination. Oh yeah, just an FYI, Numbnuts (Terp) only has a GED and makes his living at $.75 per post. He is a pool boy for hire on the side though!!! :) Not certain he is the best source, at least IMHO. Your own DD will lead you to the right decision.
There is still time for Apple to save face and not hurt their margins by buying VHC and taking advantage of the opportunity instead. They could still own the Domains and operate the Domain Name Registry for tons of revenue. As well as stop the infringement train wreck Timmy has started. It's over.
As expected the questions Apple seeks answers on from the jurors are nothing short of a fishing expedition. NONE of the jurors will answer and those that do will answer questions like "what did Apple do that was so negative to the jurors during the trial?" How 'bout, "QUIT STEALING OTHER PEOPLE'S PROPERTY!!!!" Don't think Mr Fruit is gonna achieve the goal. The questions are so blatantly foul that even a Judge with little patent experience can see right through the questions. And yes, even someone with a GED like Numbnuts would be able to see through the stupidity and sneaky goal for Apple. The Judge has allowed Apple all the rope he can to hang themselves, AND THEY ARE OBLIGING!!! When he drops the BOOM on them they will have NO RECOURSE. It's all but coming to a quick end for Mr Fuit!! And their earnings report is not helping--investors will be turning sour on the company with the bad report. Rut Roh!!
The guy speaks on patent issues and has followed VHC and others for years. Dude knows what he's talking about. His interpretation of BRI after Cuozzo arguments--Sianara!! I've read the transcripts and couldn't agree more. Shorty's time is closing EVER FASTER!! The window shrinks for Apple every day.
Let's make sure we know that's CHIEF Justice Roberts!! He will probably write the decision on this case.
You keep it up!! Does your house have a mortgage? You're gonna need any equity you got in your mud hut dude!! Read and educate yourself even if you only have a GED. You and Numbnuts!!! How stupid can one be? Nice carry costs to boot!! LOL!!!
Read the transcripts from Cuozzo arguments. Chief Justice says something to the affect: "so what was supposed to streamline the process sounds like it has done the opposite." Paraphrased of course. However, there was a general feeling that BRI is not the answer. Probably will come up with a hybrid solution with amendments being allowed in some fashion and they will be REVIEWED and DISCUSSED instead of 99% of them DENIED!! That stat had to ring loudly as wrong with ALL of the Justices!! The legal process isn't working in patents, that much even the most uneducated of the Justices in patent litigation clearly understood. Time to run shorty!!!
The courts know the system is a mess. They will have to resolve the BRI scam. You can't give someone a patent after months of scrutiny and back-and-forth deliberation with USPTO to obtain the proper language for the patent, then just dismiss it. Can't happen. Apple knows the time for payment is close. When, not if.
Mr Softy paid $223 million for VHC patent rights. They got the early bird special. Apple wanted the same deal even though they came late to the party. "Sorry Mr Fruit, it was a one-time offer only and Mr Softy took it." Apple MAY get a one-time payment deal, but it will be for multiple billions--perhaps. KL may be upset enough to forgo any one-time payments now.
Keep guessing Numbnuts!! So THAT'S why you're here--entertainment!!! Got it!! Keep up the good work!! You should tell the boss to short more, not less!!!! Get ya that raise you've been hoping for!!!
Down from 17 million just a short while ago to about 10 million and the latest short report has them down about another million!! They're sneaking out in droves as they know something is gonna happen soon to the upside!!! Dark pools, trading scams, reverse conversions, ANY WAY they can without running the price up!! Unreal how the SEC lets them get away with this nonsense!!!
Will you idiots disappear already!!! Holy #$%^& I've deleted about 50 of your idiot posts in the last week!!! GO AWAY!!!!
Go to IV if you want some in depth knowledge about the patents and Cuozzo etc. The people over there are very knowledgeable and continue deep dive information posting. As to your question, for one thing, you only need ONE (1!) of the claims to be upheld and the patents are good. Now, it may lower your negotiating stance, but if it were to go from $1.42 per unit to $.75 per unit from Apple, well, that would only be $750,000,000 instead of 1.3 billion!!!!! Think I can live with that. Also, Cuozzo should get a bunch of this mess off the table. How can it take often times 10 years to climb through the USPTO process to get a patent and within 1 year based on BRI, the patent is not valid????? Sorry, not possible. AND it's the same damn neighborhood group!!! The patent process in this country is a mess and the SCOTUS knows they must get this right or inventions and patents for tech will disappear if owners recognize they are useless. Our tech advances would come to a screeching halt--not good!! VHC has also already won in court--TWICE!!! Don't think even OUR legal process can simply dismiss that--tough explanation!! Besides, Apple wouldn't have anything to steal in the future.
He's here to make a living at $.75 per post!! The guy just a paid flunkey who can't make a living any other way. Works for someone short VHC more than likely. Just a parasitic scab.
The time frame is getting tighter for Apple and they know it!! The U.S. Courts are being put to shame by their European counterparts and it's EMBARRASSING FOR THEM!!!!
Apple has been found guilty of infringement of another company's IP in Germany and the Fruit will not be able to sell their products there any longer. Apple may appeal, but, the process in Germany is QUICK compared to the U.S. and Apple will quickly run to the settlement table there and in other locations where that company may press their IP ownership. Apple is on the run and VHC has them by the balls!!! The first shot has been fired against Apple and even Timmy now knows time is short before the U.S. courts system straightens out this patent mess we have here!!! RUN SHORTY, RUN!!!
Study a while, then try for that GED!! Your buddy Numbnuts claims he has a GED, but for the most part I don't believe him!!! His boss has got to be tired of him (and you!) sounding like complete parasitic scabs that even he is turned off. You keep trying there little buddy, you can take the GED test as many times as necessary!!!