You said you shorted at 125.75 but I replied that it never traded that low. Now you post that its 126.15.
Why are you posting fake trades???
Sure your never wrong because you lie about you trades. Like when you said you covered 1800 pm at $126.76 when only 1100 volume at that price. You never gave me an explanation for that???
20 million shares traded is 'lemmings over-reaction' really? That's pretty funny....
What other excuses are going to use for not selling some NSAM?
Let me guess its managements fault you didn't sell and they should issue a press release.....lol. Too funny......
There's nothing wrong with that. The problem with you and everyone else here is anytime any posts any contrary you start attacking people. Dar does this often and arrogantly attacks any one who doesn't anyways agree.
You all say 'great call dar' but when things go bad you conveniently make the excuse for him 'you can't predict the unknown'.
If he doesn't have problems with any opinions contrary to his then why does he and other 'children' on here out people on ignore???
If its such a great long term wealth creation vehicle then why is it down over 20% from the top?
'We don't really care were it trades in the short term'? Really? Unless you have to sell for some reason.
You've fallen in love with the Dar hyperbole and now you are making excuses for not selling.
20 million shares today...look at volume ;sat few days.
It not a matter of a short term prediction but when would you sell this position then?
Never saw that train coming. I guess he isn't as smart as he or you all think.
You only make profit when you sell.
When you buy a stock you have to set criteria for when you will sell.....
You post sounds like you're 'in denial' about not selling NSAM and locking in some profit.
So you think NSAM volume is retail....lol. That's a good one. You can splice the number anyway you want but NSAM down another 10% today. Considering you know better than the rest of us. Why is that happening???
So what bogus trades will you post today?? I think he put me on ignore because I busted him yesterday....
He's the one who said he covered 1800 shares at 126.76 in pm yesterday when only 1100 in volume at that price. How was that possible???
Still waiting for your response and you are so good at posting so I know you saw it.
So what's your answer????
How could SON cover 1800 shares at 126.76 in pm when only 1100 crossed the tape at that price? How is this question offensive or an unfair attack??? Still waiting..........go look at Nasdaq data.
How could SON cover 1800 shares at 126.76 in pm when only 1100 crossed the tape at that price????????????
So 'SON the great'...what's your explanation for covering 1800 at 126.76 when only 1100 at that price crossed the tape???