constantine, as depressing as your statements are, I cannot come up with a valid argument against them. I have only been in HYGS for about a year, but I have become a firm believer that their technologies are truly groundbreaking and should present a bright future for the shareholders. But in today's world that might not be enough. Right now there seems to be excitement generating from HYGS presenting at the upcoming conference. During my brief tenure here, they have presented at several conferences with little to no impact on the share price, so why should this one be different? I have built a rather large position here and have tried to remain positive, but it looks like I may have to start facing reality. There are many other "story" stocks out there promising riches after just one more disappointing quarter. Let's hope that HYGS comes out with a nice beat on the numbers and some positive guidance moving forward.
The Market Capitalization is simply the current price per share multiplied by the total number of shares. So each time the price changes, so does the Market Cap.
gumby, it looks like your turn in the barrel. Sorry, but you're a big boy and I know you can handle this. Make me proud!
Thanks, Gumby. So you got a little taste of what I'm dealing with. TOTALLY unhinged. Probably upset when they found out that their "free" Obamacare came with a $6,000 deductible.
Thanks, marc. I seem to have acquired an admirer(?)/ stalker for whatever reason. They are leaving the same types of replies to my posts on every stock that I follow. I must have touched a nerve. Oh well, that's what the "Report Abuse" and the "Ignore" buttons are for.
What you are saying holds true in Antarctica because there is land under the ice. There is no land under the north pole, so how is that different from the icebergs floating in water? Maybe you need to do some homework before spouting nonsense from your left leaders. Learn to think for yourself!
I seem to remember reading something similar which ended the earliest ice ages before man was even on the planet. The globe was covered with snow and ice which was self-sustaining since the white color reflected the sun's radiant heat back out into space. Then volcanic activity spewed enermous amounts of dark colored ash into the atmosphere. As the ash settled onto the snow covered earth, the darker color began to absorb the sun's radiant energy causing the snow and ice to melt.
Try taking a glass of water and add ice cubes, then mark the level. Wait till the ice melts then measure the level again. EXACTLY THE SAME! Melting ice WILL NOT raise the water level. Quit listening to people telling you lies that you can easily verify as lies. Learn to think for yourselves.
Global Warming Scam
Written by Alex Newman
Respected climatologist and NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer actually showed evidence of what Goddard described as early as April of 2012, saying that “virtually all of the USHCN warming since 1973 appears to be the result of adjustments NOAA has made to the data.”
Multiple U.S. government bureaucracies including NOAA, NASA, and the Department of Energy are again being accused of inappropriately manipulating temperature data — or “adjusting” it, as officials at the agencies implicated in the scandal put it — to show global warming. While the accusations are not new, the latest scandal, sparked by an in-depth analysis of the data by independent analyst Steven Goddard at Real Science, relies on official records to suggest that federal agencies have been fudging temperature measurements to make past decades seem colder and recent years appear warmer.
Numerous scientists and experts confirmed Goddard’s explosive findings, but in separate responses to The New American, both NOAA and NASA attempted to downplay the significance of the accusations. The major problems identified by Goddard in the temperature records of federal bureaucracies relate to the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), the official data-set covering the continental United States. While the agencies admit the records are adjusted, Goddard and multiple scientists suggested that biased methodology was used to adjust the data to show an unjustified and “spurious” warming trend.
“Bottom line is there is clearly a huge error in the USHCN adjustments which has added a non-existent one degree hockey stick warming to the official US temperature record, and I now know just where to look for it in their code,” Goddard wrote. “NOAA made a big deal about 2012 blowing away all temperature records, but the temperature they reported is the result of a huge error. This affects all NOAA and NASA U.S. temperature graphs, and is part of the cause of this famous shift.”
From the same poster:
"0 users liked this posts users disliked this posts1Reply
Just bought 10,000,000 shares thsi morning.
by bill_jenkins87 • 57 minutes ago
May buy more next week
0 users liked this posts users disliked this posts1Reply
Just bought 2,000,000 shares at $92.50 per share.
by bill_jenkins87 • 1 hour 2 minutes ago Flag
May pick up another 500,000 shares this afternoon.
0 users liked this posts users disliked this posts1Reply
Just picked up 50,000 shares at $13 per share.
by bill_jenkins87 • 1 hour 5 minutes ago
May buy more this afternoon or on Tues."
OF COURSE HE DID.
Yeah, we need to get rid of that pesky "Freedom of Speech" thing and let the government bureaucrats tell us what we can read & write. After all, they are so much more enlightened than us mere mortals.
From Sleek Money at Merrill Lynch Trading:
"Apollo Global Management LLC To Go Ex-Dividend on February 12th (APO)"
Looks like they fooled us both. And I was going to buy some more today. Go figure.