If what you're saying is that the stupid think it's obvious, and you think it's obvious, may I ask if you do your computing with crayons and colored paper?
Bears dead right on the statistics, which makes your valuation a tad more than 1/2 of what it actually is, which is an inexcusable oversight. Especially for someone so obviously stupid.
Ino, For one thing, people on this MB read into things that aren't there. The company will release data when it is ready, either good or bad. A delay is almost expected with these things and the longer the better as far as I'm concerned, because if there were any problems, we'd have heard about them already .
You cannot question anything with some of this crowd. Just look at my foray into the intelligence of ONCS considering Reverse Splitting the stock? You'd have thought I kidnapped their kids. Sam and Bear are the most crazed, which of course nobody ever need point out.
Keep slugging it out. They get silly sometimes in their own defense and it's fun reading.......
Twiz, I think it's fair to say that I am one of those attacked for merely expressing an objective opinion. Those who aren't objective are the ones that lose in the market.
Not even close. They do have to share a piece of the pie and we have yet to know how big that pie is. A run to .75 to a $1 I don't think is out of the question primarily because it does help to once again validate the technology, but to expect a run to $2 is a pipe dream.
Reverse splitting the stock is the best thing that can happen for shareholders because it opens the doors for lot more serious investors than you'll find on this MB. Myself included..
Like my prediction on ALQA? They will R/S ONCS and when they do, I hope that you're so mad that you sell all your shares.
I will guarantee you that Punit heard an earful about uplisting this stock from investors on Wednesday. I just hope he got the message.
My Predictions never materialize? I've never in my life seen so many wrong predictions thrown out about a stock price as I've seen from you in your incessant price predictions. If there was a way to be wrong more times then you've made in predictions, I'm sure you'd find the way.
You still cannot admit that I was right on ALQA, so you are a typical small minded man.
Giz, you make my heart cry for happy. Get a load of Bears reply regarding attitude. He is the most pompous and arrogant windbag on this MB.
Watch the garbage they try to pull when ONCS finally does do a R/S. I hope they freak out and leave because that's the impression that they've given us.
Of course we'll have been right but they will find even more reasons to despise us. Probably because we know more than them.
Hotheads don't think they're hot heads so it does pose problems in trying to reason with them. Did you get a load of that fearless leader #$%$? Always laugh myself silly when they speak of missions and that pap and saving humanity when all they really want to do is ring the cash register.
Wow, you're so smart, you used the word lest in it's proper context and you even spelled it properly. You've come a long way grasshopper.......Still a stinky green bug that people hate to have crawling on them.
Post less? Work on grammar and spelling? That's rich coming from the ONCS MB king and village idiot combined.. How can anybody put a valuation let alone a stock price on any company without knowing the potential revenue stream and how they get there?
Then there's always the question of reimbursement. Even Orphan drug status has it's limitations which I'm sure ONCS will be able to live with. However it won't be anywhere near where you think it will be.
Sammy, Sorry you missed out on my double when I recommended you buy ALQA. Come to think of it, no I'm not..
I ask questions that everyone knows is unanswerable? Where do I start with a statement like that? You are brilliant!!!!!!
1.2 billion dollar valuation for a disease with 1200 to 1300 sufferers per year? 1 million dollars in value for each patient to use their electrical gizmo?
Sam, I know we've had our disagreements in the past and after that post, I'm glad for for every one of them..
I am the most hated man on most message boards that I post because I question the conventional wisdom and suffer fools lightly and am not shy about expressing that displeasure. Thanks for not being turned off by my less than affable nature.
Said with your typical gentleman's flair. We'll see what happens. You try selling the big boys that "it's not BB, it's QB, there is a difference" The investor conference was yesterday so it's too bad that you couldn't get that info to the investing parties before the conference.
Do yourself a favor, when they do ultimately R/S the stock, I suggest that you not get angry but just enjoy the ride..
You make too much sense for this board. You'll soon find out that no matter how bullish you are on ONCS, you will be called things that will require the Yahoo big brother to filter.
Those Companies stunk and they faced delisting of their stock and selling from institutions. ONCS is doing the opposite. This MB is filled with people who do not read what they do not like..
ALQAD is an example of what ONCS will do once they R/S. Maybe not exactly as good, but it would certainly be a positive
Sal, I am not surprised by your heritage because of the simplicity and vulgarity of the language you use, but could you answer me this simple question? What is the revenue stream that ONCS expects to receive per patient, and how much of that do they have to pay INO in royalties along with the manufacturer of the cancer drug?
The reason I ask that is because there is no one that can give me quantifiable answer to this question.
So talk of 300 to 400 million valuation must mean that they keep everything for themselves right?
That doesn't make me a basher or a trader, just someone curious.
12 months is a year and I'm sorry I wasn't more precise in saying that even 18 months will not see ONCS as a 10 bagger unless they R/S the stock.
Really, I actually with my own money purchased ALQA at .078 ( old symbol , it is still active). They reverse split the stock 1 for 43.75 (ALQAD is the new symbol) and the stock doubled in 2 weeks and is still up over 100%
I'll guarantee that RXII had to R/S the stock to avoid delisting because of managements incompetence or they really had nothing in the first place.
Both are anecdotal, but I will at least admit that a R/S can be both good and bad, where you seem to have an ingrained fixed notion that's easily proven wrong.
What negative sentiment? I just bought ALQA last month at .078, (the symbol still is acive) it reverse split 1 for 43.75 for 1 and the stock (now ALQAD) has more than doubled since. Guess these people didn't get the memo about the bad juju that a reverse split engenders.
Leaving iONCS in the hands of the less sophisticated is no way to get the price appreciation that everyone wants.
I have to laugh at the certainty of a $2 price prediction occurring organically in a year.
So what your saying is that ONCS is better off in the hands of mental masturbator's like we find on this MB, than in the hands of the more sophisticated investor class who see's investing from an even longer perspective than us?
Tag, you've missed my point. The people that you want investing in oncs are precluded from investing in it and the Company can in theory and proactively do something about that.