Most outrageous act of government disgrace?
How about: if you like your health insurance you can keep your health insurance.
How about: it will not cause your premiums to go up, they will in fact go down.
NSA spying on US citizens...
We will make government open and transparent ...
No more secrecy ...
We will make it impossible for congress to slip in pork barrel projects ...
We will put all pork barrel projects online ...
The public will have 5 days to look at a bill before it is voted on ...
Promise to cut the deficit in half ...
Everything about this whole administration is a disgrace.
Short the hell out of it please. This is amateur hour right now. Down only 16%? Come ON. Surely you can do better. This is an IG investigation. This isn't even worth buying into yet. I want a REAL discount. Now get out of your Mom's basement and GO SHORT SOME SHARES.
Crack open that piggy bank, go donate some blood, donate a kidney, prostitute yourself, and come up with another $37.60 total to short another share!
Any basher short worth their salt would already have pummeled this stock down to $30/share. Come ON, an IG investigation on sales & marketing practices? I threatens the WHOLE COMPANY.
Now get with the program and bash the hell out of this thing so I can buy in lower.
You are referencing Seeking Alpha - a blog - as a news source? You discredit yourself when you show you don't know any better than that. SA is a joke. It is a blog pretending/lying to be a news source that is heavily censored. Just go try to post ANYTHING critical of SA on their site and you'll have it pulled, even if the argument is deeply rooted in facts and figures.
The Russians and Chinese admire SA for such a stellar job of censorship.
I would argue the opposite. That now is NOT a good time to buy ANY stock. All stocks are getting hammered right now. Fundamentals are irrelevant. Outlook is being ignored. Technicals don't matter. They will, so don't get me wrong, but right now, this is a bear market and nothing is good.
The 400% growth rate is unsustainable, but I do see it based on the calculated loss this year compared with the profit next year. The part you are missing is that the loss this year will be offset by gains later in the year, so the loss would have been higher. A better model is to use a pivot point of when the company goes profitable and compare the previous 12 month period with the subsequent 12 month period. Only then will you see the accurate/true growth rate in earnings.
Meaning, if they were supposed to lose $1.96 this year and make $1.41 in 2014, that is a difference of $3.37 but what that doesn't show is that the $1.41 includes a $0.06/share loss in Q1 and $1.47 profit in the next 3 Qs, or $0.486/share per share each quarter which is $1.95/share annualized. So the growth rate is actually higher than 400%, but as I said, that is not sustainable long term. Maybe 400% in 2014 then 300% in 2015 and 200% in 2016.
Revenues is easier but they will come in clumps. As soon as they start selling in Germany and Japan, each will get a block of patients all at once, so that will tick up strongly.
No trick at all. You trivialized me, called me names "pansy" and I'm just giving you the opportunity to see first hand that you were completely wrong (about that as well as everything else).
I have nothing to hide & nothing to fear - what are YOU so afraid of? Answer: Quite a bit actually. But come call my bluff, maybe I really am a pansy. Come find out coward.
So really, you are just jealous of Mr. Beer?
Jealous of him because he is successful?
You have absolutely no right to tell him what he should or should not do. You may pretend that the company isn't that big a deal, but how many companies have YOU started that are worth $2B? How many companies have YOU started that saves lives of innocent kids?
Why are you so afraid to answer his question?
Do you own any shares of AEGR long or short?
If not, why are you even here?
Just how stupid are you?
Do you go to a movie theater and hang out in the lobby and not watch any movies at all?
Do you go sit in a Resturant lobby and never order any food?
Do you just sit outside and gripe & whine?
What a waste of a life.
It is interesting to notice how the stock is down 40% yet no change in the institutional or insider ownership. Who is selling all these shares then if not an institutional investor nor insiders (and forget about the argument on the insiders exercising the options, those are shares already priced in).
Well, you certain only have the right President for it. He is so committed to the poor, he is producing HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS more!
1) Yahoo doesn't set prices, they only report them.
2) Down 8.4% would show that wherever that number comes from, nobody cares.
Oops, did I let the cat out of the bag?