Isn't LNKD another heavy SBC company with no GAAP profits?
Another smart CEO there who has sold a boatload during the death of money QE and ZIRP. The Fed could have just handed him the money directly.
I was thinking the same thing. He could have put Cramer on his lap and used him for his ventriloquist dummy.
Wait a second!!!?? Maybe that's what's been going on here all along. :-)
Ah, who knows the reasons. The whole sector has been up the last few days just like many out favor sectors. If you want another possible cause of concern, 2 I track GDX and SLW have been rallying sharply. That's the gold miners ETF and Silver Wheaten a silver and gold streaming company.
My head is spinning from all the up and down movement in the many stocks I track.
If you're trading you can try and play the swings but it's not always that easy in this algo driven market.
Whatever you are buying and holding you must be comfortable with it and it's prospects and i know most of the longs that post on this board are in that camp.
Good luck and I do like the PR about the large machine, I hope the corner has either already been turned or it is about to be.
Not you smitty. It was one of the fools I generally have on ignore. Total nonsense as he was the only one bringing up race. Personally, if he have a purple candidate that I believe is good for the country or rainbow even that's who would get my vote. Race=meaningless in my book and my life.
The reason I said an idea is because the costs are going up anyhow unless your employer picks up all the pain which is not typically the case.
I think I have a pretty good idea of whom you are referring to and I think generally you are correct.
There's a very good chance such a thing is happening here. You have Kerx and his stooges on the board with the short and distort campaign yet didn't most say they aren't even short?
Then why would they be here essentially 24/7?
My advice. It's noise. You can scan their posts to see if there are any facts you think you should be aware of but mostly it's nonsense like "look at the share price" etc.
I have a small position but IMHO their claims don't pass the smell test. I'm not emotionally attached to this stock by any stretch and I think those short would ultimately like to get out at the lowest price possible. Read the positives and the negatives and make up your own mind on the risk/reward and determine how much pain you may be able to endure.
I saw this one late yesterday John. He had written a good stand alone article on SILC in 2015 before the ADI acquisition closed, not sure if it was before it was announced.
I'm not saying the gas savings aren't a really good thing but my own personal health care cots went up nearly 20% last year and in absolute dollars wipes out the gas savings and from what I've seen in my area rent inflation is real.
I agree but unfortunately the increase in rents and health care costs are more than making up for that for many.
I looked back a year and may have missed it but I did not see a higher volume day than today.
Is that a bad thing with the stock up so much?
Can you and the other A-oles knock off the bumps which are being done to further pollute the board?
Get a life clowns. Add some value.
Leave the board.
Let's see while not talking about any specific stock I have heard Leon Cooperman, David Faber and others mention this, let's stack them up to a nameless troll who acts like a moron on a stock board, three t smittty4901 vs. them. Real tough decision on who might be more credible.
The excuse used will be lack of liquidity and I'm talking about many stocks here but it's basically a license to steal. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I should restate. I would bet on it also unless some other crazy circumstance changes the narrative. I think CB actions are losing steam and when the patient is addicted to drugs, larger doses are required. I think that bridge has been crossed.
Are you referring to the past December quarter or Q1 2016? Strangely there is no March estimate on Yahoo as I look today.
You may or may not care but Blackrock became an over %5 owner in the year end 2015 reporting period submitting a 13G on 1/28 with a 5.5% ownership stake.
I agree on the divergence theory. If they start delivering it will be hard to keep this down eventually.
Your posts are appreciated. It pays to keep an open mind and not let confirmation bias sway us. With that other one it was not that the poster necessarily put anything over on us it was predominantly an over confident CEO who basically in hindsight made a deal with the devil but also was making sure he took plenty of skin off the table which investors should always be aware of. There's an old axiom that insider buys mean much more than insider sells. I generally agree with it with the exception of when a major insider is selling large percentage of their shares.
I appreciate you sharing your research with us.