See: “The Belgian Connection” by Peter Schiff
This is just one of the ways that the Fed is hiding the facts by shifting its QE out of the country to give the impression that its buy-back of indebtedness is “tapering”. Williams mentions that he doesn’t see QE being “tapered”, but this is one of the known ways QE remains at current levels, despite claims to the contrary by the Fed’s monetary authorities.
Quantitative Easing raises the monetary base and adds to inflationary risks. Williams points out that the consumer is already tapped out and can’t spend, so he expects a downturn in the economy that soon will have to be widely acknowledged.
Don’t you just love these Princeton/Harvard/etc terms invented by banksters? These people need to occupy jail cells where they can no longer do harm. Courts should make the possibility that central bank leadership will NEVER again engage in this type of theft with PERMANENT solutions that will dissuade future bankster theft. That should extend back to all living Fed Chairmen/women along with dissolution of the Federal Reserve Act. Of course, short of a revolution and a return to Constitutional rule, it’s never going to happen. People, including Williams and Hunter, are too afraid to suggest appropriate sanctions on central bank board members and their allies in the corporate and political world. They are far from alone, in that regard. When the hammer finally falls and evidence of where guilt lies becomes widespread we need PERMANENT solutions, and not stop-gap measures that will only mean a return to business as usual in short order.
Again, I make this suggestion to those who have found interesting Internet posts. Don’t make your readers hunt for your suggested articles if you want as many as possible to access your suggestion. Merely provide the title, in quotes, so there is no question about what you are referring to. It works as well as a link.
Western central banks are desperate for your PMs. They are taking the PM market down slowly (which is fine with Asia) with some minor upswings. Western banks for a number of years now have been transferring PMs to the East. Now they need to replace what they have discarded FROM YOU.
Previously it was though that perhaps $1200 gold and $19 silver might be a bottom, with the caveat that from that point upward the reversal would need to be apparent.
Remember, virtually ALL the PM newsletter writers have been wrong about the direction of that sector. It should make you wonder if it is incompetence or a secret alliance they have with the banksters using, of course, plausible deniability.
As stated from this screen name about 2 weeks ago, Peter Schiff penned the following: “The Belgian Connection”. Now Jim Willie has stated much the same in “BRICS Gold Source & Belgium Bulge”.
These findings are related to the take-down (manipulation, such as recent Barclay's revelations) of precious metals with central bank impending insolvency. They are attempting to drive down the PM market filling their coffers with YOUR PMs along with the same old siren song of gold as a “barbaric relic” worthy only of disposal before the price goes lower. All this should mean is that PM investors should be looking for an impending bottom in the PM market, taking advantage of the lower prices provided gold/silver investors. The only way this can be recognized is with a large uptick subsequent to a bottom that takes out overhead resistance. This will mean that relatively deep-pocket investors have come aboard and will not countenance losses the result of CB manipulation without serious lawsuits (perhaps as a class) combined with public exposure of CB wrong-doing.
Note, also, that major stock indices are moving upwards on declining volume, which is opposite to expectations of a long-term uptrend. The old refrain applies: “Bulls make money, bears make money but pigs get slaughtered”.
See: “Gold And Silver: Debt Is Trouncing Precious Metals, For Now” by Michael Noonan
“What may not be as widely known is that the English Rothschild bank funded the North in America’s Civil War, while the French Rothschild bank funded the South. It did not matter who would win, the Rothschild’s were going to increase both their wealth and, more importantly for them, their influence in US politics. That had always been their primary objective.”
This is just one excerpt and is worth taking the time to read the rest. It represents how the misuse of a massive fortune, to garner even more wealth, is not anchored in any belief system based on humanity towards others. As such it is the Destroyer of everything in its path merely for personal gain by using the ability to fund national conflicts on both sides. There are many accounts of how Rothschild money, and those of their allies, which includes the Prescott Bush family, funded the #$%$ regime and that of the Bolsheviks (Rothschild interests) during WWI. Those who might want to call this anti-Semitic need to respond with facts of their own as these are not opinions. Of course this is Yahoo, which doesn’t allow simple links in order easily corroborate facts from credible sources. Why might that be, other than a mentality wishing to keep people in ignorance.
What this boils down to currently is the power to print un-backed currencies for whatever the “money trust” considers its objectives through its private central banking resources. This corrupts everything destroying the so called “free market” in the process, which relies on honest money. This sort of corruption is the perfect description of the urban definition of “filthy rich” in a contemporary context.
Since no one here has the brains to figure out the exact time when the banksters’ house of cards will collapse, nor does anyone else, banksters and their inner circle excluded, we must rely on the admittedly cloudy predictions of those who have spent many years of their lives trying to divine the future.
A rather good editorial on where we are headed is titled, “The Real Purpose Of QE…It’s Not Employment” by Daryl Robert Schoon, wherein he states: “...The bankers’ ponzi-scheme – which began with the distortion of free markets in 1694 when the Bank of England began issuing debt-based paper banknotes alongside the Royal Mint’s gold and silver coins – is coming to an end. ...” The Rothschild’s noted The success of this scam & was not lost on Amshall Moses Bower, whose son later changed his surname to Rothschild (you know the story) and used it to garner the huge profit potential for their empire building scheme.
In 1694, in this country, much of commerce used England’s silver coinage to settle debts and as exchange for something else of value to them. The same is true of Spanish coinage, the result of the plundering new world gold. Along came Alexander Hamilton, a Rothschild agent, to define what had to be exchanged monetarily, termed “legal tender”, and the flood gates were open to bankster greed and plunder.
Note the date of 1694, for those of you that think Fibonacci TA will make you rich. If that was the case no one would be visiting finance.yahoo. They'd have a bankster loan for their yacht at some exotic place surrounded by a bevy of beauties plying their gold-digging trade, who, in their airhead view of finance, would accept “legal” counterfeit instead.
Those of you that continually obsess over each twist and turn of the PM markets are totally missing the big picture. Now it looks probable that we might test $1200 Au again, an unusual triple bottom. For those who have kept their “powder dry”, that could be a major opportunity for future profit. Stay tuned.
Today one of Yamana’s deepest leap call options, the January $20, expiring in 2016, got a bid of 2 cents, the cost of 1 option, which controls 100 shares, would be $2 (without brokerage commissions). Open interest is approaching 2,000, meaning theoretically (at 2 cents), all open interest could be bought for almost $4,000 (plus commission). The ask side didn’t deliver. Could the bid have been from “caseyboy”?
At this point, from the perspective of the option investors, it sure looks like the call writers on this option are in the loser’s corner and this stock is NOT going lower.
How many other people’s time did you waste (because you removed the Topic) who saw fit to answer your reference to the very good article by Tyler Durden on ZeroHedge titled: “China Signs Non-Dollar Settlement Deal With Russia's Largest Bank”
Further, if you have any appreciation at all for other people’s time, you’d provide the title, as shown above, of the article so extra time doesn’t have to be spent looking for it. It’s called copy/paste into your message. It’s assumed you already know Yahoo doesn’t allow links, unless they are from Yahoo.
See how easy that is?
Based on the way you’ve responded to many others there’s not a whole lot of confidence you’re response will be useful.
Isn’t it interesting that Yahoo considers “#$%$” (NATCHY) a word that shouldn’t be displayed without a login profile that allows the use of “bad” words. Yahoo rule makers are more than a little bit creepy and twisted in their thinking.
Please read the free on line book by Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall called “Wanta! Black Swan, White Hat”.
It’s a lot to read, including links to supporting documents, etc. It's as thoroughly documented as possible, given the subject matter.
It reveals a mind boggling level of corruption from US Presidents on down to Cabinet level officers in the trillion$. While individuals are not alleged to have received what amounts to stolen “money”, the implication is that through laundering of these monies they ultimately will be.
It’s well documented with actual letters to POTUS’s, Cabinet officers, major banks and their directors, foreign leaders, the US Justice Department, Federal Reserve, FBI, CIA, Wisconsin courts, tax agencies, etc. It includes attempts to silence the principle focus of their acts of racketeering, Leo/Lee Wanta, who, as you might guess, has had to flee from the USA into exile. If this money was repatriated the USA would experience an unprecedented level of prosperity.
The amounts of money held in trust for the people of the USA to prevent it from being stolen by the above government officials are so massive that just the legally held accounts of Leo/Lee Wanta would amount to over $90,000 for every man, woman and child in the United States. Is there anyone reading this that wouldn’t wish these funds promised to them as Americans to take place? The amounts are backed up by courts and other documents. This doesn’t include those who probably also have large amounts earned through dangerous work for the government. As usual, Yahoo character (1984 char) and link restrictions can’t be more specific. Just input the above title in your search engine and you’ll find it.
This Topic, and any others wish to submit on this massive level of government corruption, would in a small way signal that “we’re mad as Hell and we’re not going to take it any more. Those involved should be tried for TREASON or we’re all going to eventually go “down”, here and elsewhere.
Occasionally the underlying AUY options are looked at. It seems that NO new call options for AUY have been written,, put or call, beyond January 2016. If this remains it seems there is an understanding by option writers that they have no idea which way this stock is headed, and possibly think it is going higher. Higher stock price would be a losing bet for option call writers. Does anyone think there may be a hint from this information that call writers think AUY is headed higher?
2015, January Strike, Open Int.
“ “, 1.00, 1
“ “, 11.00, 80
“ “, 6.00, 95
“ “, 14.00, 100
“ “, 4.00, 113
“ “, 3.00, 154
“ “, 9.00, 349
“ “, 27.00, 397
“ “, 7.00, 813
“ “, 30.00, 1,028
“ “, 22.00, 1,916
“ “, 12.00, 1,950
“ “, 25.00, 2,907
“ “, 35.00, 2,967
“ “, 5.00, 3,296
“ “, 20.00, 4,786
“ “, 8.00, 5,889
“ “, 13.00, 7,272
“ “, 15.00, 10,077
“ “, 17.00, 11,615
“ “, 10.00, 19,060
Note the highest open int. for AUY call buyers are those of Jan., strike 10.00, 2015, indicating that call writers think there is a reasonable chance those will not reach the strike price, but will attract the most buyers. Note, also, the January call is the only one that exists, in contrast to other years.
The following is the AUY call list for Jan, 2016 (also, the only one existing):
2016, January Strike, Open Int.
“ “, 3.00, 377
“ “, 17.00, 714
“ “, 5.00, 819
“ “, 15.00, 1,040
“ “, 12.00, 1,795
“ “, 20.00, 1,923
“ “, 10.00, 7,620
“ “, 8.00, 9,322
Bets seem to indicate that reaching a strike price of 8.00 is unlikely on the part of call writers. Buyers, on the other hand, favor a profitable trade.
The conclusion, as far as AUY calls are concerned, AUY share prices will tend upwards, and call writers no longer have any interest in participating in calls. Due to a lack of ANY direction there is even a paucity of put writers. In contrast there are more call options available than put options, indicating a tendency on the part of buyers to favor calls. Notice that there is no longer a Jan 2015 call at a strike price of 1.00. (perhaps written by caseyboy-even he doesn’t think it will go that low).
All of the above does not indicate when the open interest arose, merely what currently exists. There is one free website that you can access to determine open int. over time called optionisticsDATcom, if you want to look more in depth.
Again, char. limitations from here are 1984 (?), though it has been noted that others post considerably more.
Is tapering REALLY taking place? See: “The Belgian Connection” by Peter Schiff
Apparently the Belgians are acting as a money laundering agent to give the appearance that the Fed is actually “tapering”. Schiff doesn’t say so in that many words, but let’s just call a spade a spade. Since there is no way to track who the buyer of US Treasuries is in the case of purchases by foreign interests connected to central banks assumptions have to be made, which are quite rational.
Belgium apparently has been the go-between in US Treasury purchases that total half of Belgium’s total GDP since so called tapering began.
It doesn’t take a lot of reasoning to arrive at the conclusion that the Fed is using Belgium to mask an unabated QE program which for domestic consumption is called “tapering”.
Of course this is all black ops behind the scenes financial manipulation never publicly disclosed. That’s just another reason the Fed needs to be fully audited. Too bad Snowden is not available to reveal the details on this one. Or maybe WikiLeaks.
Night crew a-Holes are not allowing our post. Seemingly accepted post did not appear after 4 tries.
I thought about you, and your comments on your perceived differences between communism/socialism and fascism.
Access the YouTube presentation using the following title: “G. Edward Griffin: The Collectivist Conspiracy (Full Length)”
You see, there just is not much of a difference.
The information sources were:
1. “Malaysian plane: 20 passengers worked for ELECTRONIC WARFARE and MILITARY RADAR firm”
2. “Rothschild owned Blackstone Group benefits from missing flight 370, becoming primary patent holder of new technology, reports say”
3. “Rothschild Takes Down Malaysian Airliner MH370 to Gain Rights to a Semiconductor Patent – Getting Rid of Those Who Stood in His Way!”
4. “With the disappearance of MH-370, Jacob Rothschild becomes the sole owner of a semiconductor patent.”
5. “Malaysia Airlines Plane MH370 Latest Conspiracy Theory: Who were Freescale Semiconductor Experts on Board?”
6. “Glenn breaks down some of the theories surrounding Malaysian Airlines flight MH370”; Beck: “See, this is the problem. Once you lose trust as a government, once you lie to your people over and over again, this is what happens. Conspiracy theories go crazy because I don’t trust our government at all. Remember, they were the ones who rushed to say, ‘It’s definitely not terrorist.’ Well, how do you even know that,” Glenn concluded.
7. “Patent Pending” at SnopesDATcam: This gets the closest to any contention that this is a conspiracy theory, with caveats, and it was the only one found with a browser search.
There is the question of what these employees from Freescale were doing on a flight to China when talent exists in the US. Wars are the mother’s milk of banksters. Not the first time that Chinese were close enough to sensitive info to steal it.
Further, in compiling the above list no links appeared stating why any of those previously listed were wrong in any detail.
techpath2000: You have not provided ONE shred of online reference to debunk any of the above sources. YOUR arguments are not backed by any credible source, only YOUR opinions. No credit given you for plagiarized comments. That being the case the same thing will be written to you as was written to “donwshuper50”. “Now you can report to your handlers, the biggest control freaks of planet Earth.”
The thing about all of this is the way people view banksters. They all wear conservative suits and who would EVER think of them as CROOKS. This was not always so. Historical accounts reveal great mistrust of banksters. The guillotine is too good for this bunch of pin-striped suits. That clearly is not the case currently where everyone is plugged into their iPhones in receipt of non-essential information of no help to their well-being.
When this nation was founded by Declaration they stated within: “...And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
These bankster vermin are destroying all the Founders brought into being, along with the lives of millions, not only in this country but in many others. It is just too bad that those who like to tout themselves as “conservatives” every day over the airwaves can’t function to spread the real issue of our economic malaise and point out who is really at fault. Enough of this right/left labeling. But they have spines of Jello unfortunately in comparison to those leaders of over 200 years ago. This all could be turned around, if only the right people would face the realities and speak out.
In the face of all of this it seems sacrilege to only look at the economic opportunism. The survival instinct is understandable, but without an objective rings quite hollow.
You’d be best advised to delete this Topic as well before even more come to understand you’ve currently got nothing of value to contribute.
In the meantime work through your personal problems and come back again with something worthwhile, including the title of e-articles you find of value. The insults you enjoy heaping on all you respond to are detracting from anything worthwhile you might have to say.
This forum, for most of us, is to lend as much as we’re capable of to as wide an audience as we can an understanding of what we honestly believe will become profitable by exposing issues that could move markets, maybe not today or tomorrow but at some future date.
GL will come to you with the recommended changes to your attitude.
It seems the goldbugs, with their eternal hoped for bottom, always jump in too soon. This includes the “analysts”, on average, who, for a number of months, even years, have been saying the bottom is in. Their predictions have ALWAYS been wrong, and they have been prying precious funds from the hands of investors that could have bought in at lower prices. There is agreement that PMs are the wave of the FUTURE. But any who pay for analyst’s views should still be waiting and still believing the bottom is not in.
A SALE is (as some seem to believe is the case for buying into the PM sector NOW) when PMs and their derivatives have bottomed. Those who are truly predictive are waiting for lower prices, and so far they are still waiting. Some of the better analysts have been predicting a bottom around $1200/oz for gold, which would represent a triple bottom. They could be wrong, but only if overhead/bottom resistance has been penetrated, (upside/downside) which it hasn’t.
It is very important that as many as possible get into the PM sector when it TRULY bottoms. That is the only way to KILL the central banks. They may be seeing to it, behind the scenes, as they have been doing, that enough ammunition is being stockpiled to KILL many times over those who have bought into the PM market at the bottom, thus threatening their hegemony. Faced with enough resistance (by those who have bought into a TRUE bottom) they will have to disappear to self-imposed exile to escape their day in court with a JUST sentence.
The word “KILL” has been used in the same vein as it would have, were President Andrew Jackson to have used it. Study your history because his obvious hate for private central banks will make its usage perfectly clear. Pay attention, also, to the historical accounts of Nicolas Biddle, as today’s central banksters are not going to roll over when threatened with legal action proportionate to their crimes.
This is about the none-existent “RULE OF LAW”.
Notice the swing in the gold market today on Kitco. It started at a low of $1276/oz and reached a high of $1304/oz. The upswing began in the New York Globex/Sydney market culminating in a high in the New York COMEX. This is a $28 swing.
Obviously this is a worldwide cabal at play. Currently the market looks to be topping in the COMEX. Expect a plunge below $1276/oz in the days ahead with a possible bottom around $1200/oz as the manipulators produce as many weak handed bagholders as possible for their next round of fleecing.
Look for the bottom below which they cannot go and throw everything but the kitchen sink at it with your remaining dry powder; your choice of PM shares, options or hard assets. This could very well launch a new long term uptrend as shorts get squeezed into the street corner tin cup brigade, whilst living out of a cardboard box. Give them no handouts.
Stay away from the futures market unless your crystal ball has exceptional clarity, but remember you probably might not be able to take delivery and might have to accept “money” instead. That has already happened in the UK which elitists there still consider the USA as their colony.
See: “Gold…Inflation Is Dead, Long Live Inflation “ by John Ing
Could this portend, in the not too distant future, a public announcement that AUY is the subject of a tender offer?
One other question is; the PM market has been uncharacteristically quiet. Is that because it is being manipulated to be this way as not to create a problem for any large PM mining companies that are having secret meetings to discuss a merger and PM market volatility could be problematical for a merger?