-"Well, we can probably take this as a good sign."-
A perfect nome post. No long here will EVER be able to arguably accuse nome of falsification or misleading statements.
Each post is a perfect mixture of unreproacable fact coupled with an erroneous personal conclusion that in no way can reasonably be taken as advice.
This guy is good and beyond reproach, and you are screwing yourself, with no one to blame but ourself.
Madiff, Kenny is correct when he says " Each trade pretty much includes one of each, a buy and a sell"
So the correct title of your post should have been "More Selling and Buying"
Madiff, please consult with Scout and Irn151. Its not selling, its buying.
You need to give credence to experts on this board.
Repeat ths until you understand: its buying....its buying...its buying.
-"And that was a significant fault of management. They should have known better but instead misled the company's shareholders and the market by calling it a Phase III study.
And what happened to Brad Thompson's twaddle whereby he repeated stated that the results of this "Phase III" clinical trial would be sufficient to file in the EU? Now nothing! As the CEO he should know better than to mislead his shareholders. "-
Seems that you very special people do eventually yield to the truth after your childish games of militantl recalcitance.
All those ridiculous posts about the Ph III trial are now marked as the prattling of very special people.
There is more truth coming for you to yield to.
Say youre Glad you didnt sell, then throw me some childish insult and go back to reading armed.
You did this to yourself.
The promoters here gave both sides of the story.
-"D2fucs - your personality shows by the negativeness of your posts."-
Yeah no way is bailly carrivechio.
Baily, grimboid, irn151, carrivechio, donpoffenRoth. Same scwball?
That was the only thing twas propping it up.
Some shorts take profits after a big fall, creating the DC bounce phenomenon.
Oncy should be between .75 and a buck and a quarter to be in line w its junk biotech peers.
Id give condolences but not to you people. No way, no how.
Now that markets are closed till the PFS release before trading tomorrow, we can speack freely.
The 2012 pancreatic trial flat out failed after only 11 patients. You can easily find this in comany SEC filings.
The Sarcoma trial did not flat out fail because of a couple partial responses.
But a few PRs dont necessarily mean a statsig better PFS.
If the PFS was good, it would have been released tonight.
As far as the messagebard hysterics, its all just noise.
I closed my small position. Better to know I lost 12 perecnt than take a chance on 50 percent loss.
Thanks CYTR for not putting in a halt.
Make your own decision. Nothing on this messageboard is of value.
Make your own call based on your own DD.
My call is it could go either way, but my personal decision is the results to date support a small bet.
Yeah, Maybe the public will discover Reo Gene Therapy after seeing that CBS item.
At the very least Oncy longs can rest assured that Gene Therapy like Reo are further validated.
Baily is not carri.
-" It is like the mentality of a Democrat. They look at life the way they would want it to be rather than the way it is. "-
I'm a Democrat, and, unlike raybans I will admit that not all my trades have went well. However, surveying my 15 year record, I find two variables that have allowed me to early retire with the wind of the ACA at my back (for only a fool would retire with less than 10 million and face the individual i sura ce market in most states):
1. A penchent for multibaggers
2. The record shows that successful bets were large and bad bets were small. The biggest one bet gain was 1.2 million, the worst loss was a 93 percent wipeout on about 200k
Looking back, I also see that Most of my winning ets were placed at market bottoms in 03 and 09. Most of my gains were in turnarounds and distressed debt and equity, with a few biotechs here and there. Biotechs have also been some of my worst bets.
The AGNC messageboard was highly anomolous with successful and or educated people such as Ray85, that Korean fellow, and the pied piper of options disaster, the optomotrist - their names escapes me.
I admit to becoming too attached to AGNC, selling well after the top at 33 or 36, 28, and keeping 10 percent all the way down to 22.
I guess the hesitation on closing AGNC is due to my Democrat DNA.
To save the trouble of some replies: I am a narcissist. I am a highschool student. Any bad trades I mention are true, none of the good ones happened. Every poster that you dont like is me with an alias.
Scout, bryantmichael is old comared to the new version of nome, grimboid.
Grimboid is here to be the new squecky clean authority figure that longs turn to for assuance. Created Oct or Nov 27.
How come no longs noticed grimboid's late appearance?
Why did he claim he's been posting as grimboid for a long time?
Scout, your epwstan, not those other names
Carri is irn151, bailey and grimbold
Carmyk is i ama scientist
Nome is a new name for someone in the crew that was maybe discredited by btisaclwn before my time.
Its funny how you make fun of me for catching Carmyk pretending to be a scientist. Something hes been doing secretly for years.
You people ran your board like ------s, you begged me and still beg to be criticized.
Someone has to do it.
Speeddog and bridgeconstructor are part of the crew and are secondary IDs of a crew member.
The only real people not part of the crew are armed, kenny, stb, falco, tredeon and possibly teapartyguy. and stb are occasional posters.
Kenny, armed and myself post because of idiosyncracies of personality.
Pretty much most other names are part of the crew, simulating a group of investors.
Doc Klumps, I did a little worse then you, half at 33 and the next 40 percent at 28 and kept ten percent till 22. But my entry may have been better as I was buying in the teens in 09.
But listen, I need to add a few items and run them through that brain of yours and see how the info is crunched.
1. Have you tested your assumption that jobs boomers are leaving will survive and be taken by post millenials or will these positions be closed? As you know wage growth has been stagnant for a large portion of the population for some time. Do you think that is correlated with delayed boomer retirement or more like radically structural shifts in the economy
Also, consider that because there are less post-millenials, not every job would be filled if it could.
Please test your high -paying-hand-me-down jobs hypothosis.
2. Here is some bit of an intuitive observational question for you to consider in your modeling: The size of the baby boom Moving through the economy may be as deflationary in their going out years as it was inflationary in their coming up years.
Seriously think about these. I look forward to your reply
I think you need to find a way to model the fact that there are two economic Americas now. Corporate and research, development centers like Boston, DC, NY, Dallas, California, Seattle and the rest o fthe counrty.
This is a profoundly new structural situation that will affect everyone's economic models.