These cos are rallying on their respective Q4 ers. HQCL has not announced yet, but I would not expect much from their upcoming er, it will be based on their pre-merger performance. There is always a chance they can surprise. GL
I do not believe that Hanwa increased the number of shares outstanding with the intention of a reverse split. I see a reverse split as not likely unless that share price drops and stays below 1. for an extended period of time. But I make no guarantees. I do not work for Hanwa, and they are not making decisions based on my opinion.
Btw - a reverse-split does not dilute the value of your investment by itself, it is the reason for the reverse-split, as in poor performance. HQCL is a stronger company than HSOL was.
No disrespect intended but you sound like a weak hand to me. Imo, the people who fret the most are the ones who are most likely to have oversized positions in a stock, and in the case of HQCL, you have already lost as much as you are likely to have. Again, I make no promises, nor should you be looking to others for them. DD is your best investment advisor. GL
Hanwa is making better decisions now, the question for me is whether and when will those decisions pay off? I give them about a 50% chance of reporting a net profit in 2015, but they should be decreasing their debt to income ratio significantly by their Q2 er. Jmo. GL
It does seem odd that TAN would have such a large stake in a a company with sch a low share price. I can only assume the reason is due to high expectations for Hanergy. So far, that bet seems to be paying off. GL
I do not know if HQCL will do a reverse stock split, but if so, you should not lose any money, as neither splits nor reverse splits by themselves will change the value of the company. I see no reason for a reverse split, unless the share price drops below 1., in which case HQCL could risk de-listing from the Nasdaq. That is not likely. GL
1366 Technologies and Hanwha Q CELLS (HQCL) announced that they have entered into a long-term strategic partnership to jointly advance the efficiency and quality of solar cells while dramatically reducing their costs. The two companies will collaborate on the development of 1366's proprietary Direct Wafer Technology with the intent to commercialize and use Direct Wafers in Hanwha Q CELLS' world-renowned solar cells.
sach, there is no guarantee that HQCL (aka Hanwa) will do right by shareholders, we are all hoping that Hanwa got its act together after making a number of poor decisions in the past.
Imo, the merger was a good decision, we have to wait for them to deliver now (by eoy or sooner), or move on. Their own stake in HQCL, and their credibility as a 'public' company should be sufficient motivation for them to deliver. GL
You can call it a anything you want, but it was short term prediction, as were the others I mentioned. And I suspect there was some analysis behind one or more of them, but when all is said and done, this is not an exact science. If it were we would all be making the same decisions.
It seem unlikely to me that you decided to buy HQCL and RGSE based on 'analytic capacity, knoWledge of probabilities based on hypothesis and theoretical models'.
That's funny. But apparently I am the only other person in this board who thinks so. I guess it's not so easy to laugh if you are underwater. GL
I can only hope we see a significant price move in 2015, 5 years is my limit on 'long term'. In the meantime, underwater investors should learn to make better analyses and picks, and to then take ownership for their own decisions. GL
Why do you thnk doc thinks his batting average should be 100%?
He already answered your second question - "I am under water on HQCL". Right?
Feel free to show us the agreement you have with doc that says he is obligated to provide you or anyone else with only winning stock picks. Do you take what anyone else says on any other mb as gospel? Do you know what DD stands for?
Does anyone doubt that there are zombies on this mb?
The last time the SIRI was under 1. per share was before Hanwa acquired SOLF and created HSOL - right?
The reason for your post is suspect. Be careful about who you call a shnook.
Don't know if he actually wrote this, or if a clever mb poster improvised in his stead, but I agree. GL
A good suggestion, but your sample question number 2 is a loaded question, so any answer to it would confirm that conclusion.
wing, his forecast was a short term prediction, not a guarantee. One or two others also predicted 1.62 by ea, but not likely until perhaps a day or 2 before then (buy-ins by swing traders).
For reasons we discussed today and earlier, I do not expect a significant pop in share price anytime soon, unless HQCL pulls a rabbit out of their hat (like announcing a big contract, or partnership). I doubt the price will pull back below 1. Not exactly encouraging, but it is what is is. GL