Thu, Sep 18, 2014, 8:07 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Microsoft Corporation Message Board

hia_intell 3 posts  |  Last Activity: Sep 10, 2014 8:52 PM Member since: Oct 11, 2008
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • hia_intell by hia_intell Sep 10, 2014 8:52 PM Flag

    Okay, here's what's happening:

    First off, the iPad is a thin-client computer. That means that third-party applications are run by connecting to a website. Then much of the computing and file storage is by the website instead of by the handheld computer.

    And so a PC is a computer that can run third-party applications without connecting to a website. Then most of the computing and file storage is by the handheld computer itself. Of course the PC can also connect to websites.

    Then according to the iPad the thin-clients will wipe-out the PC's ? No, see the iPad took off as a mobile computer when it had low power consumption advantages. But now the mobile PC processors have largely caught-up with the low power consumption advantages of the thin-clients processors. And so now the thin-client iPad now faces enormous competition from PC tablets.

    In fact take a look at the Dell Venue 11 Pro at $430. Now one advantage of the PC tablets is that they can install and run a PC version of MS Office. But there are PC versions of MS Office for the Mac and so that raises the question of "Where is the MacPad ?"

    Now you might be thinking that you very much like the simple applications that are available for the thin-client tablets. But see simpler PC applications can be developed for PC tablets but that while keeping the advantage of running any PC application on the PC tablet.

    And so the iPad is in trouble but it may just be too early to see it.

  • Reply to


    by karmakahn Jul 15, 2014 1:05 PM
    hia_intell hia_intell Jul 15, 2014 1:53 PM Flag

    I said "widespread demographic involvement" ?

    Well, economically speaking that's inflation or deflation. The Fed should have no opinion on asset valuations unless they are measurably driving inflation of deflation.

  • Reply to


    by karmakahn Jul 15, 2014 1:05 PM
    hia_intell hia_intell Jul 15, 2014 1:31 PM Flag

    The Fed is warning about the valuations of social media and biotech stocks.

    That's silly, the Fed should should have no opinion unless there is a widespread demographic involvement.

    The AG "irrational exuberance went into the history books as brilliant policy poetry but then the property
    market asset bubble was missed and that could have been identified by the number of sub-prime mortgages issued. People that needed houses were buying houses but also people that didn't need houses were buying houses. And people were buying houses bigger than they could normally qualify for. But the idea of easily buying houses was everywhere because as many sub-prime mortgages as possible were being written. Interesting that the availability of sub-prime mortgages drove the demographic rather than the demographic driving the housing demand.

    How is widespread demographic involvement identified ? I don't know but a small percentage of former internet investors hanging on to newly available social media stocks is not it.

46.68+0.16(+0.34%)Sep 18 4:15 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.