LOL! I think he's trying to drive a message home. Reminds me of when I heard an interview with a consumer advocate who was fighting against the use of Bovine Growth Hormone in dairy cows. He just kept talking about added pus in cows milk (BGH increased the amount of measurable pus per hundred gallons or so). He must have used the word pus ten times before the interviewer told him to stop!
What's the point? DR will just tell you what he thinks you'd like to hear, with little regard for the truth. I was wondering last night how on earth he's going to continue representing the company at these investor conferences. He'll be laughed off the stage!
Hope you are correct. The REAL problem however has to do with Darren's credibility. He's a symptom of what is wrong with the entire financial community in this country these days. The majority of the clowns who claw their way to the top have so little integrity, and a reasonable person can no longer take the average CEO at his word. I could say this a lot more expressively, but Yahoo would only censor it.
Fud is a clinking clanking clattering collection of collagenous junk
Entertaining to see all you short morons crawl out from under your rocks today! Where the heck were you when it was running up to half a buck, despite the lousy ER?
LOL! Guess I'm happy to know that Darren is in BFDI, KTCC, HTM and posting on numerous stock message boards. Hopeful, now that your secret is out, tell us how you manage to find time to run the company!
I'm a big boy, so I won't blame anyone. Hopeful's contributions to this and other boards have been invaluable to me.
for me is that I was almost disgusted enough to dump after last earnings, when Darren failed to deliver on statements and assurances he gave in the prior CC. When the Rockband news came out, I decided to hold on. The fleecing we're taking here is worse than the one after the earnings disappointment. He SHOULD be sued! I would actually almost join a class action, just for revenge, even though they are pointless. This hurts, because it may be a buying opportunity, although Darren has destroyed faith in the company to the extent that anyone who has followed the mechanization of this clown would be loath to throw good money after bad. Wierd, since inexperienced greenhorns actually stand a better chance than most of us long term believers. On a different note, I should have seen it all when Elmer MEIFUD went long!!!!!
First BFDI and now this. I'll tell you micro, I'm about ready to quit this market and sew my money into the mattress. I'm sick of legalized theft.
on Yahoo yesterday about how HONEST (Darren are you reading this?) CEO's generally lead more successful companies than the prevaricating sociopathic types. What does that tell you about this company whose PPS has been under .50 more often than not for close to a decade?
I'm starting to think I'd get more satisfaction seeing Richardson canned than I would from making money on my present holdings. What a odious, conniving piece of work that guy is!
PPS should be stuck above a buck, if at all. The stock certainly doesn't deserve to be selling at .46.
Key words: "now believes that, based on the past two years of profitable operations, the Company can reasonably expect to utilize these accumulated tax assets to offset future taxable gains."
Am I wrong in assuming that going forward, earnings will come in at .11 per share or better, thanks to "accumulated tax assets"? So what is the stock price doing here at .46? This morning's trading is surprising me. Are we waiting for the CC before it moves up?
the stinkin' perverts can keep a stock that made eleven cents for the year and reaffirmed guidance down below fifty lousy cents! This stock should be above a buck!