I believe it was 1 buyer that bought all those shares inside of 3 minutes: 155,000 approx. As for the offering, there was no new offering it was just a reinstatement that they have a shelf registered and that is what caused the sell off IMHO. People thought it was a new offering and it wasn't. They will change the wording for those filings next time - GLTA
Ed is sometimes off a bit with his outlandish posts BUT he's not stupid and he is here for the long haul. I am not speaking for him but understand his frustrations with the previous CEO and I am with him on that. The only thing Floupel is good for is his scientific achievements. We must be patient with GTHP for it will come to fruition before you know it - GLTA
By the way Gme, welcome back. Nice to see a couple posts/day from you. I don't care what others say about your posts here. Important thing is that you shoot straight from the hip and that is what we need here! GLTU
Very good point Gme. I believe in the human side of the equation. The FDA will NOT want to have millions of women knocking on their doors via tele or email or in person asking the FDA why are you holding this great new technology from coming to the market and helping us avoid the degradation in our gyn's doctors office and the go for an unbearable Colposcopy only to find out it wasn't necessary. That is what I believe in with GTHP and why the FDA will not hold Luviva back - GLTU always Gme
Hold on guys, this is someone in here dumping and IMHO, it's not going to last very long. Again, nothing has changed with their science and if something was wrong, GTHP would have to release it and since nothing is or has been released, then IMO I am holding til I've got something to tell me not to hold. GLTA
that have stop loss orders in place. They get triggered, period! This is like giving shares away especially when NOTHING, nothing at all has changed in the science of GTHP. GLTA that have the stomach like I do to bear this through
Furby, those 2 are the same person. I've noticed in the grammar of each and they are the same - too bad for them, or are they "it's".
oil12345, the down trodden is going to recoil and when it does, YIKES!, it will take the roof off the house. I am hoping that this quietness of the company means that they have something that NO ONE is going to be expecting and I am hoping that it is on a startling and revolutionary level of pure change to the way many cancers are treated from this point on in time and disprove all those that said Electroporation was a dud - GLTU
An EPITAPH for these morons with multiple ID's that keep changing every month. RIP you guys/girlies or whatever your label is. I don't and won't even feel sorry for you all when the "proof of the pudding" is released by ONCS in a PR.
You all know it's coming so why not just drop your shorts, cover your shares and go long. It's coming and I don't think you want to be on the wrong side since you've been on the wrong side for way too long.
Not ONE trial has proven wrong so far and that is a statement. Do you bashers have nerve enough to believe you are right in that ONCS has nothing and is worth nothing? I don't think so.
As Dion Warwick's #1 song, "Our Day Will Come", and it is to a theater near us rather than the one your viewing.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Furby, these morons are here for a purpose (puntacanaphill, pukealo etc) to just make all the newbie investors scared out of their shares. To us, they are just a nuisance, nothing more - GLTU
will be? I'm not sure since they said last quarter they would at least reach 200,000 in sales. What say you folks - GLTA
I didn't realize it but yeah, my post also vanished into the wind. Oh well, that's YAH for ya - GLTU j10292
Yea, I saw that but you know j10292, Ihub is better but they too, depending on the moderators, also delete posts that are condescending on one another that have gone too far & I'm okay with that since they are great contributors on posts especially on ONCS MB. That is a GREAT board IMHO - GLTU
Guys, this is what I am talking about & I think I'm correct in this but I will start out with J10292's quote: "only MMs see every bid/ask and they are supposed to fill orders as needed from their inventory or can naked short per rules."
Yes MM's can put pressure either on the bid or ask as THEY need to fill orders and CAN pressure an equity to fall far and fast with their naked shorting or just the opposite in the ask. If I am totally wrong in this, then I am wrong and willing to admit it - THX guys & GLTU both
Seanoise, I totally understand what your saying but when these MM's like Citadel, Nite, and others have to much or not enough liquidity, they have to move it to stay liquid for the brokers who need them and that is when they can control both the bid/ask depending on what they need to do, correct? GLTU for I do respect you as a great contributor
That is what I am talking about Seanoise, MM's can manipulate the bid/ask depending on their liquidity needs
Isn't it liquidity from the MM's that make all spreads? That's what I thought depending whether it's Nite, Citadel etc. They are the one's usually in control and buyers and sellers respond to those bids/asks - GLTU Seanoise
.408 to .484. Now who would buy with that kind of spread with no news. Would anyone? Not me. Seems very fishy for the MM's to try and pull that off - GLTA
ALQA hit the LOD and then the HOD all within 1 minute 3:59 to 4:00, any one know? Not a lot of volume but it sure climbed, dropped then climbed to close at HOD 5.99 - GLTA
It's not as bad as I thought albeit they spent more and had an offering and most likely will need more funding but that is normal for a bio-tech company. I am still in and will continue to hold on for there is a lot more to come - GLTA