u remind me of a rhesus monkey..you know the ones that wear ties and throw feces at one another during experiments...putz
so what you are saying is that they aren't working as hard as they can now??? you think, whomever the Kodak ceo is, that they have been halfassing it?..you think they have their junior engineers on this project?you think they have been delaying the imminent success so the new ceo can talk to them and finalize the manufacturing process?
sometimes I wonder how often your synapses fire
this was trading at $9 when management decided they need money immediately...and got $7 per share for the stock that was trading at $9
are you on crack?
Kodak Business park is thriving..the clean up is due to the 80 years of dumping chemicals...the fact that you opine that this has any impact whatsoever on present operations makes me wonder if your IQ is even in double digits
I have the shorts on ignore..i have no use for the ha ha ha ha ilk....I don't need your pity and I laugh at your notion that I let the shorts lie all day unfettered...I post very seldom..im long, approx. 19,000 shares at a cost basis of $14 (so im getting hammered)...that said, your continual notions that the shorts are "trapped" is as ridiculous as any ive seen here...lastly, I don't need anyone to "have my back"...whereas I appreciate the notion of you wanting to help, we do need to "keep it real" the shorts, at the time of this writing, are making a killing on this equity....and as I have stated previously, jack welch could be announced as the new ceo and it would not matter an iota if we cant make the process work..as for my sources, I live in a city called Rochester NY
the numbers are presently in the high 40's ive been told.
as for your comment about "is that all I got" not sure what you mean, however I would caution you not to pontificate as you have been pumping this stock that has been dropping early and often
why are you gracing us with your presence if you covered?
super..i would have thought the new placement would have at least put a floor in at $7...something appears amiss here
are you also hotonstocks? they post the same drivel..im sure they (shorts) are terribly disappointed in today's trading as UNXL is only down about 5% but they are more concerned about volume...
with this logic shares can drop to $5 but if volume is low they lose??
I appreciate all your comments..obviously the quite period is over..i wonder if they are simply going to explain why they had another secondary when they were not in dire financial straits...I am down approximately $40k in just a few months..haven't sold but getting an itchy finger for two reasons
1) good science inept management argument
2)macro issues and a potential correction