The alert I read was that Ultimate Stock Alerts have caused all of their clients to lose their entire investments.
I always like coming back here now and again for a laugh.
p.s. please continue to use 'bagholder', thats my fave.
The obvious is best depicted in a post last month:
Oct 9, 2014 5:32 PM
"Bagholder": the essential (yet futile) weaponry of a basher.
Don't sweat it. These days, statistically*, we are all at the bottom of the food chain.
*a tiny percentage of Americans control nearly half the wealth of the U.S.
Oh, we all know whats happened, especially the last one, which you missed out on. Many more than just you have made more than 50% on this stock in recent times. Almost all that have can include yesterdays addition. Almost all because we know of your position, or lack of it. Not to continue the buy @ sell strategy, which required minimal effort and time, was foolhardy.
Could you help me out on how to describe a declaration of a 50% gain as 'miserable', then gloating about getting 50% on MTL? Thanks.
Oh, you did. Its not clear as to the reason you missed out. Because such short-term gains in this stock have happened so often? Because it wasn't between 100 or 200%? Section 6051.07 was too complicated to understand presenting a huge risk in a long position? Perhaps I give to much latitude in denoting a lack of clarity in your reply since such reasoning is astonishingly ludicrous.
The luxury of missing an almost guaranteed 50% in less than a month is rational only if stupidity is not irrational.
There are many in the is world that can afford to be idiots. Few admit it.
"Judges in PR are politically appointed and in a culture with rampant corruption there is likely a lot of behind the scenes 'talks' taking place, pressure being applied,..."
You just falsified your original claim. If corruption appoints the judges, the judges cannot be the pinnacle (where most likely to be found) of corruption.
This confusion is what one can expect from the mental capacity of a racist.
"if there is corruption of the kind many commentators within PR say there is, then it would likely be found [within the lower court].