Sat, Jul 12, 2014, 5:20 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Amazon.com Inc. Message Board

im_too_hipp 142 posts  |  Last Activity: Mar 13, 2014 10:12 AM Member since: Mar 9, 2002
  • im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Mar 13, 2014 10:12 AM Flag

    so earnings will increase exponentially? Let's hope so as the multiple has blown out the last year exponentially, so somewhere ahead the earings can catch up to the 650 multiple. But that's uncertain. Nevertheless, as usual on what was expected news anyway, traders are climibing over themeselves to buy AMZN today on this EXPECTED news. Enjoy the chase.

  • Reply to

    It's the Economy !!

    by gregbent Jan 30, 2014 8:56 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Jan 31, 2014 8:25 AM Flag

    "they reported 20% sales increase -- yes, that is growth," that's growth at the expense of taking your earnings down 75 % from the peak to keep that incremental sales growth. That's why they had to tap the bond market in late 2012 and are heading toward there again ahead: Retained earnings has stagnated for years now: why is that despite the fact that most of the spending AMZN does can be captialzied, yet retained earnings stay stagnated. GAAP for AMZN mean growth at any price. And I'd argue the upgrades that come with AMZN by these analysts are now become so over the top Pavolivan, why even report numbers? And remember: AMZN competitiors in ALMOST EVERY DIRECTIONS HAVE HUGE CASH PILES built up in this bull market. That won't make it easy for AMZN to merely turn the Prime lever, or any other , to get sales to drop to the bottom line. Maybe some, but perhaps not even close to bring down the multiple run rate that AMZN runs at now. You''re a pump artist Bent. nothing more.

  • Reply to

    It's the Economy !!

    by gregbent Jan 30, 2014 8:56 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Jan 31, 2014 7:29 AM Flag

    "A big driver of growth": driver of what growth? sales? earnings have fallen off 75 % in the last 4 years to drive incremental sales growth to the point where AMZN has to tap the bond market in order to operate and keep buying back shares to keep o/s share counts from exploding upwards. Consumers are fickle to price increases on where they will get their items and ther'e's no guarantee that upping Prime prices will make people stick to AMZN when the freedom of buying from anywhere exists. Bezos is tapping down his cash quickly to keep this house of cards near $400/shr together. Regardless, he has locked into the benefit of the doubt that WS has gvien him.

  • Reply to

    did you know that Amazon's p/e is 1460?

    by virtualgh0st Jan 31, 2014 7:03 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Jan 31, 2014 7:23 AM Flag

    and forget all these analysts earnings targets: I'd like to see an analyst ask when AMZN is gonna get back to getting close to peak earnings of $2.52 alltime for 4 qtrs. They make 75 % less than that right now. It's not gonna be easy to even get there : which would give AMZN a 385/2.52 = 153 times peak alltime earnings right now. That's off the charts in itself.

  • Reply to

    did you know that Amazon's p/e is 1460?

    by virtualgh0st Jan 31, 2014 7:03 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Jan 31, 2014 7:18 AM Flag

    not it's not: it's now lower: replacing 21 cents AMZN made in 4th qtr 2012 with 52 cents in 2013, give AMZN about 60 cents of earnings in 2013. So the PE at 385 price per share is now 638 times earnings. whatever happens ahead, Bezos has been a huge winner by locking into selling 15 million shares as WS has pumped AMZN to over $400, while disregarding the peak earings decline to gain sales. It will be interesting how much Bezos can turn the Prime screw pricing up and keep loyal customers to pay it. That's why choice for the consumer beyond one entity to buy from is a great thing to have.

  • Reply to

    Nice run up coming in 30 minutes

    by jeremysikessr Dec 26, 2013 10:02 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 26, 2013 11:08 AM Flag

    items shipped as a measurement. How about sales #$%$ shipped at least. We know that profit dollars were abandoned long ago b/c there are none: but times shipped aren't even sales $'s: they meaure more than sales '$. You watch.

  • Reply to

    Nice run up coming in 30 minutes

    by jeremysikessr Dec 26, 2013 10:02 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 26, 2013 10:52 AM Flag

    the masterful "letter" : items up , but won't come close to matching sales $'s. Too bad "items shipped" has been inversely correlated to profits.

  • Reply to

    Missing the Point

    by come_on_jeffb Dec 3, 2013 8:05 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 3, 2013 3:04 PM Flag

    you really think people will feel save on a road like the LIE just outside NYC in rush hour with self driving cars? Computers malfunction all the time: what kind of crackups will that cause? I don't see those self-drivings cars being adapted anytime soon and I hope they don't. I trust people to drive more than computers.

  • I say April 30,2014 a the latest.

  • Reply to

    Drone PR stunt back fires

    by onsl_99 Dec 3, 2013 10:53 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 3, 2013 11:03 AM Flag

    "Instead it shows a glaring case of waste of company resources and mal investment in frivolous concepts rather than growing the company into profitability"

    in the old normal, perhaps we'd get alittle more scrutiny to what's up with AMZN. Now there seems to be a cloudy line to what passes for investigative journalism. As it seemed to me, Charlie Rose was fawning over and promoting Bezos as a feudal lord. They are both in the Bildeberger soceity afterall and the concept fits with what this bull market has been of the 2008 housing debacle: a collusive step by Central Banks to have a wealth effect rally in stock espcially, no matter what the valuation it leads to ,passing wealth up the line to the Jeff Bezos and Charle Roses of the world, at the expense of the rest of Society. Profits be damned, it's all about pumping concepts to the end by the ones in power, FOR the ones in power. It's reached such utter nonsense proportions now.

  • Reply to

    Trouble ahead ?

    by gregbent Dec 3, 2013 10:40 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 3, 2013 10:46 AM Flag

    example of one of the many big pocketed competitors of AMZN. Though one would never know it looking at AMZN's stock performance the last 5 years. Not that easy to snap a finger to get scale and drop it to the bottom line.

  • im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 3, 2013 8:28 AM Flag

    it's not AMZN's tax, it's AMZN's collection from the customer tax. Less revenue maybe but doesn't mean less profit as ,we know, AMZN has lost more to the bottom line to gain scale to the topline. So it doesn't necessarily work that way to the profit line.

  • Reply to

    AMZN Free Cash Flow History

    by gregbent Dec 2, 2013 10:31 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 3, 2013 6:49 AM Flag

    it also depends on the price they are flushing the inventory out at, along with the cost to get the inventory out at. There's huge inventory this season in the Holidays. AMZN is great at flushing inventory out on deals, but it's on those deals, that take thier margins down where the top dollars are so reduced, that they don't reach the bottom line. Competition is fierce as ever. AMZN's gonna hit the bond market again going foward on the cash bleed ahead in my, and some others, view here. Hype aside.

  • Reply to

    Brilliant Free Advertising and Timing on Drones

    by gregbent Dec 2, 2013 8:07 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 4:41 PM Flag

    "our belief that an earnings figure at a certain point in time should matter as much to others is the opposite of the truth. it simply does not."e

    that's nonsense. Maybe under an easy money QE regime, but not when the insiders get paid before there's any retained equity. Then it's a glorified ponzi scheme.

  • Reply to

    Goldman upgrade

    by dsh1134 Dec 2, 2013 2:15 PM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 4:36 PM Flag

    Goldman is the gov't basically. Every Central Banks head QEing around the world is an ex-Goldman employee almost. And no Company has benefited more from QE than AMZN.

  • Reply to

    AMZN net income in 10 years- $4B

    by kenji100 Dec 2, 2013 1:28 PM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 4:34 PM Flag

    there's a simpler way to know what net income is for AMZN over it's lifetime: retained earnings: that's the next earnings of AMZN after dividends paid and we know it doesn't pay dividends. It's $4 billion, it's under $2 billion. There lies Bezos genius as he's worth about $50 billion with that 18 year condition. Another thing that's phenomenal into this parabolic is that AMZN traded at about 40 times earnings at the lows of 2008 at 35, and well over a 1000 after running 11 times that low there abouts. So , now to equate to that 40 multiple, AMZN would have to quadruple it's peak earnings ever. Obviously, they can't use a multiple justification with the stock running so high against that kind of measurement. And moving on a parabolic basis. Someone in powerful places ordained Bezos to be worth $50 billion without an earnings multiple. Phenomenal stuff.

  • im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 10:49 AM Flag

    "Why don't beezos concentrate on making a dollar profit then spending his time on stupid projects."

    bigger question is the oppositie: why should if WS is gonna keep rewarding his loss leading strategy more than a company with built up retained equity? Doesn't make him ever have to and until he does, I don't think he will.

  • Reply to

    Brilliant Free Advertising and Timing on Drones

    by gregbent Dec 2, 2013 8:07 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 10:47 AM Flag

    I speak the truth:tell where their peak earnings were greater than $2.52 /yr to this point? You can't. As i said, more power to Bezos to get this much belief without a consistent profit model. Don't change the subject.

  • Reply to

    AMZN Free Cash Flow History

    by gregbent Dec 2, 2013 10:31 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 10:44 AM Flag

    obviously, they didn't have enough free cash flow to not have to hit the bond market last year for $3 billion. And it's gonna come again in my view ahead. Bob Olstein does not agree with you that AMZN is operating in a positive free cash flow postiion right now. I think tapping the bond market supports that assertion no matter what you say. Inventores are very high and comptition will be very highs this Holiday. AMZN sells alot of this deal stuff more than high margin stuff for them and they ship it away over cost when the overall operation is added up. People like buying stuff below cost and they provide that, especially for the $79 a year free shipper go into the black against AMZN quickly.

  • Reply to

    Brilliant Free Advertising and Timing on Drones

    by gregbent Dec 2, 2013 8:07 AM
    im_too_hipp im_too_hipp Dec 2, 2013 10:35 AM Flag

    indeed , they made profits a ways back, the peak being $2.52/ over a 4 qtr period: that dwindled toward nothing the past three years to where a quadruple of peak profit ot $2.52, slaps almost 40 multiple on AMZN:in other words, expecatations have never been higher as shown by the parabolic move in the stock sinc the 279 lows of Auguest, yet to get quadrupling profits to it's peak, or even back to $2.52 is elusive at best. AMZN is a loss leader and WS digs that, I'll give you that. It has 20 multiple now to making $20/shr in year some year, decade, millenium going out. Meanwhile Bezos pocket is stufffed with locked in gains. Kudos to him that he has such belief by WS to get this situation that's in the parabolic zone.

AMZN
346.20+18.28(+5.57%)Jul 11 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.