Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 6:50 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Intel Corporation Message Board

intel_fanboy 22 posts  |  Last Activity: 10 hours ago Member since: Oct 20, 2011
  • intel_fanboy intel_fanboy 10 hours ago Flag

    Jerry Sanders was kinda an idiot, but he did have a point. The point of ARM was that the fabs were constantly being run at full capacity so the economies of scale could be passed on to each customer. The problem that they didn't foresee is something they could have learned from PC users. Some of us demand the latest unlocked Core i7 which so we can water cool it and push it to 5GHz while dropping in a $1000 video card. But for each one of these enthusiasts there are 100 people who would be happy with a Core i3 or i5.

    Is the world really demanding more high end Smartdragon processors? Are they willing to pay the $700 for the Galaxy Note 3? Or do they want a $200 smartphone with a MediaTek run of the mill SiP? It's amazing what you can get for under $200.

  • Reply to

    another hit piece by Aessa

    by billy_ray_valentine Jan 28, 2015 10:22 AM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy 21 hours ago Flag

    I read it, seems to me it was giving reasons why Apple butting ARM in the MacBook is unlikely.

  • Reply to

    foundry orders dissapoint

    by semi_equip_junkie Jan 27, 2015 11:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 28, 2015 9:23 AM Flag

    What? What? What? You mean the world's demand for ARM based products isn't endless??????

  • intel_fanboy by intel_fanboy Jan 27, 2015 3:46 PM Flag

    The bad news about the XP upgrade cycle is that we Microsoft has to work against those windfall sales from last year. There are some great talking points if you want to bash Microsoft and Intel. Nenni has figured them all out. But the reality is that Microsoft and Intel have continued to grow over last year despite the windfall sales. In a few days it will all get sorted out but in the meantime enjoy the discount on two great stocks.

  • intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 27, 2015 1:05 AM Flag

    RT isn't dead yet. Part of the problem is that they have warehouses full of RT tablets needing to find homes that they are still hoping to sell to suckers, I mean unsuspecting fools. Which makes me wonder, how long before all the rechargeable batteries need to be replaced on the unsold merchandise?

    I am thinking right now there are meetings being held at Microsoft where people are swearing that RT is a great product but needs to be re-positioned. What we'll probably see Microsoft re-brand RT as "Windows Phone -Tablet." Which of course makes as much as "Core-2-Duo-Quad."

    Microsoft has been pushing ARM devices since Windows CE. It's gone nowhere, but they have a long, rich history of lackluster sales with ARM based products and a belief that someday it will all pay off.

  • Reply to

    The End of the ARM Era

    by wallisweaver Jan 21, 2015 10:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 26, 2015 10:13 AM Flag

    "At a given level of technology, an ARM uses fewer joules per mip and is smaller and that's that. Unless you need to run Windows, why bother?"

    Most of us have been on this board for years. We saw these types of posts with this simple logic all the time a few years back. In a perfect world this argument should be all you need.

    Within one year you saw 20 to 28% of the tablet market which was ARM fall to Intel. Intel forecasted 40 million tablets but grabbed a bit more. True they lost money on each sale, but with each passing month it was a bit less. Sooner than you think Intel won't have to pay the difference between it and an ARM based SoC/SiP.

    What Intel got was credibility. now developers are starting to develop for Intel based devices running ARM (answer to your question "Why bother?" is because Android based Intel devices is where the market is heading).

    Something that should keep you up at night was Intel more or less said 40 million tablets last year. It wasn't a goal, it was a limit. They could have picked up even more market share. When Intel can sell it's SoC's for the going rate in the market and turn a profit how much more ARM market share can they grab?

    The thing that is nice about the ARM ecosystem is the very thing that will make it hard to fight off Intel. With each ARM partner taking their small part of the market will find it hard to fight off an Intel who is huge and vertically integrated.

  • Reply to

    The End of the ARM Era

    by wallisweaver Jan 21, 2015 10:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 23, 2015 10:13 AM Flag

    I can tell by the way you write that you are an engineer. I am willing to bet you either have an EE degree or have been associated in the field for a very long time. I love how engineers have a cause and effect relationship with design and market share. The best design doesn't always win. They don't.

    " if the CPU benchmark scores are legitimate," If you're suspect of the results why should I trust them?

    "ARM is talking about $75 phones with LTE this year..."

    Is this a business plan or simply a talking point for ARM? To me it sounds like a talking point. Here's what a business plan sounds like.

    "Mr. AT&T. Yes you've noticed the recent influx of Chinese made smartphones in the market. Consumers don't know how good they are or where to go if there is a problem. We have sourced these five jobbers in China to make phones. We have sourced the raw materials down to the injection molding with your logo on it and ours a well. You can offer them in these colors and styles. We'll make the injection molds for you. In fact we'll change them for you slightly a few times a year so your customers will have a hard time finding cases online. They will have to buy them from you and you can sell an accessory pack as well to bring in even more margins. We will audit the phones for our own quality control. If one dies within 18 months we'll credit you for a replacement. Consumers can buy the phone with confidence knowing that it will last. Since it's your phone you'll never have to update Android if you choose not to. But if you do want to push out an update it will be your call how you would like to do it. The phone will have the Intel logo on the outside so they can buy with confidence. In the ads for the phone if you mention Intel we will pay for half the ad. "

    Will Qualcom, Nvidia, Microtek or any other supplier be so bold? No, they are in bed with A&B tier handset suppliers. Will they help pay for ads?

  • Reply to

    The End of the ARM Era

    by wallisweaver Jan 21, 2015 10:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 23, 2015 9:51 AM Flag

    Oh, the old "Scale and volume" enlargement. We've heard this for years. Intel grabbed 46 million tablets from ARM last year. Market share on phones will be even easier. When the smartphone market goes generic people won't really care what's inside. Thanks for ignoring servers. Who anointed Intel an over 90% marketshare in that space? Certainly not IBM! Taking market share is something Intel has a long history of doing very well.

  • Reply to

    The End of the ARM Era

    by wallisweaver Jan 21, 2015 10:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 22, 2015 11:48 PM Flag

    I thought about your question and here's the best way to answer it. Where ARM blew it happened over a year ago. The iPhone had current technology, but not always the latest technology. That changed in the 5s when it went to 28nm 64 bit. The largest smartphone manufacturer now has the most current processor in their phone. This ensured that other manufactures who also want current technology will be six months to a year behind Apple in the latest nodes. I am seeing a lot of different specs about where Intel 14nm will land against Apple's A8. For argument sake we'll say it's behind, but not far behind in benchmarks.

    I believe what you said is correct a year or two ago. Intel will be pushed out of the A and B tier handset manufactures. The C-tier manufactures ( C for Chinese) are going to be private label for for carriers made with a few different SoC's or SiPs from Intel. But Intel will design an array of phones based on a few different SiPs or SoCs. and source everything and pay for the injection molds. ARM will do the same thing as well. Intel of course can help support the carriers with paying for advertising. Carrier specific generic phones featuring Intel Inside.

    This is the C-tier handset manufactures eating the market share away from ARM by offering premium cell phone technology at the $200 price point. The fight will be with ARM at 20nm. How will ARM 28nm do against 14nm from Intel? Demand for 28nm and older nodes will die off as orders fall off. This concept is called 'Inferior technology." Intel did it with servers and will do it with phones. It's not top down, it's bottom up market penetration.

  • Reply to

    The End of the ARM Era

    by wallisweaver Jan 21, 2015 10:37 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 22, 2015 2:12 PM Flag

    ARM isn't dead at 20nm. But they will start to face real competition from Intel starting now going into full pain mode within a year. The fabs that can afford to push 20nm aren't the ones to worry, for now. The backlog will occur at 28nm and older. They will be fighting for fewer and fewer orders over the next year or two. You'll start to see some of them close. As Intel predicted eventually there will be two titans. Intel and ? Samsung? TSMC? Stay tuned.

  • Reply to

    More info on Alex Guana.

    by paul.ottelini Jan 20, 2015 3:09 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 20, 2015 3:19 PM Flag

    He's doing what is called a "solid." Some institutions need to buy in on Intel. They got a slight discount. This downgrade will be forgotten in a couple of days.

  • Reply to

    Get OUT now before MUTUAL/PENSION funds do.

    by sandyippolito Jan 16, 2015 10:08 AM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 16, 2015 10:39 AM Flag

    Yes please give away your shares of Intel to a smarter investor.

  • Reply to

    My Current Take on Intel

    by wallisweaver Jan 15, 2015 10:42 AM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 15, 2015 9:34 PM Flag

    Every few months somebody buys big into Intel and the stock goes up a little, down a little but basically remains flat. They get frustrated and dump it, but first they need to come on here and vent about what a POS it is and why we're all bag holders.

    It's a stock that pays a good dividend, and in the case of those of us who bought in at much lower share prices it pays a fantastic dividend. Looking down the road the stock is poised to do well long term. I think the news today will freak out a few major investors and the stock may sell off over the next. As long as analysts aren't lining up to downgrade the stock it should bounce back and be around $37 and change later on this quarter. IF the market drops this quarter than of course Intel will be affected.

  • Today I am gong to, as my hip-hop DJ's say "Kick and old school jam." Back in the day (about five years ago) Paul Otellini, then CEO of Intel was in the hot seat. It had become clear that Intel missed the boat in smartphones as sales skyrocketed and the Intel stock remained stationary. At an investors meeting he made an interesting announcement. For every 622 ARM based smart devices sold they needed one additional Intel server. The profitability on the one server was greater than the 622 smartphones. Keep in mind that this was a time before the $59 smartphones at Walmart.

    When it comes to mobile devices it's a race to the bottom. ARM has made no secret that they want to expand sales into 3rd world countries. These are very price sensitive markets. With most of the planet living on $10 a day or less this means that price is the limiting factor.

    As the mobile craze further reaches into new markets this means more server sales for Intel. The other push for servers is the Internet of Things (IoT). Cameras that come off your wrist and fly away, snap a blurry picture and return may not be in our future. But things like controllers for sprinkler systems that create custom watering routines for grass based on stats gathered by weather forecasts and amount of shade at different times of the year the area receives would be beneficial. Most of the work would be done on the back end my Intel servers. There are many practical examples that are useful but perhaps not as sexy as smart baby monitors and sports watches.

    Back in 2008 I wondered what the next era would be all about. Would it be a software driven era or a hardware driven era. I bet on hardware. Looks like it was a good bet.

  • Reply to

    ARM fails while Intel wins!

    by paul.ottelini Jan 13, 2015 4:25 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 14, 2015 7:55 AM Flag

    The ARM processor is basically strong enough and good enough to have powered RT devices. They could have powered many interesting and innovative Windows RT laptops. Most of the failure of RT should be pointed at Microsoft and not ARMH. It was mostly based on a new ecosystem, the Windows Metro Apps was based on Microsoft's version of the iTunes store model.. Had this really taken off to the point where consumers didn't care that the ARM processors couldn't run legacy Windows programs RT would have been a success. When Microsoft made the decision to include ARM during the era of the first iOS devices it seemed like a good decision. Now that Intel has power and performance covered on all fronts RT really isn't needed.

    The other half of the equation is if you believe ARM has enough capacity to satisfy demand for its products today. If we're talking nodes of 28nm and larger then yes I do think that this is the case. When Intel brings in extra capacity, especially pointed toward the newer smaller nodes this somewhat impacts demand for the newer nodes from ARM (20nm and smaller). More importantly the extra capacity means that older nodes for ARM (28nm and larger) need to fight harder for the remaining orders. We've seen this before, older technology fighting to stay alive with too many competitors with fewer and fewer orders. You know how this story ends.

  • intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 12, 2015 8:47 PM Flag

    If you bought Intel thinking it's going to go to 80 next month then get out now It doesn't work that way. If you hold onto the stock it will pay a dividend and over time it will move up to a healthy new level. If you have a small position just hold onto it and forget you own it. Check back in a year and it will most likely surprise you.

  • Reply to


    by stockjock44 Jan 6, 2015 4:05 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 6, 2015 4:08 PM Flag

    I should have mentioned it's Pacific Standard Time.

  • Reply to


    by stockjock44 Jan 6, 2015 4:05 PM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 6, 2015 4:07 PM Flag

    C/net live blog at 4:00 PM today. Look for it!

  • Reply to

    mkm partners upgrades to buy pt $45.00

    by skipaway Jan 5, 2015 7:53 AM
    intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Jan 5, 2015 9:28 AM Flag

    Very positive news, great way to start the new year!

  • intel_fanboy intel_fanboy Dec 30, 2014 2:47 PM Flag

    Obama has been keeping quiet for the most part and his approval ratings are going up. But time and time again he's proven to be a huge self-righteous blowhard that has to weigh in on key issues. Enjoy the temporary rise. He'll get nothing done with Republican house and senate as long as his definition of compromise is "Do as I say, it's the right thing to do." If you think the economy is so great then why don't you try to refinance your house, and let us all know how easy it is to do. You can thank your Democratic idols Dodd and Frank for that one. Obama has been president for six years and still the Democrats blame Bush for everything wrong with the world and praise Obama the slightest positive change. Obama was pitched as the guy who would unite America, but he'll go down in the history books as the most divisive president we've ever had.

34.21+0.435(+1.29%)Jan 29 3:59 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.